Synthesis vs Analysis. Which one comes easier to you?

[thegreenyogi]

Are you more apt at analysing things through logic or does summarising things in your head come easier to you? And do you think there's one without the other?

[Sunrising]

I think it's far easier to analyse rather than synthesise a new subject because there is no conclusion or practical end result from the analysis, you can't be proven right or wrong.

Though because of analysis we can arrive at a synthesis, a new product or an original idea.

Therefore for me it's far easier to strip parts down, than to put them back together again and make them work.

[Sunrising]

Thank you for the MHO.

[thegreenyogi]

Welcome!

[RavVid]

I would see myself as adept with both and don't think there can be one without the other.

You may end up with a beautiful solution to the wrong problem or perhaps even a solution in search of a problem otherwise.

[Shiprex]

Synthesis because I have no real interest in applying bias to things based on external factors or personal preferences and ideological pressure.

[sage2021]

I'm a very analytical thinker which is from the left part of the brain, same as math. I suck big time with math, but very analytical.🤔

[AngryCarl3]

Picking things apart is always easier than squishing things together.

[eagle1951]

I always go over things in my head, hmm that could be the problem

[Nikki1989]

Analysis.

[Lynx122]

Both are pretty easy ;)

[xawyx-3]

I prefer Analysis.

[msc545]

I think analysis comes easier.

[MereAnarchy]

Making stuff up comes easiest to me.

[Paige2006]

Analysis