Polls

A federal appeals court ruled that President Trump can fire members of independent federal agencies, including two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission. This challenges a 1935 Supreme Court precedent that limited a president’s ability to remove officials without cause.

Supporters say it’s a win for accountability—if the president is held responsible for the executive branch, he should be able to control it.
Critics argue it undermines agency independence and opens the door to partisan abuse.

Do you agree with the ruling? Or do you think it gives the president too much power?

Appeals court rules Trump can fire board members of independent agencies - www.npr.org/.../trump-firings-board-members-appeals-court

How do you like to play games?

In your most recent relationship, you decided to move in and live together.

Please tell us, by voting in the poll, who moved in with who?

In my family it’s very much like the men sit with the men and we discuss man things, money/investing/career/politics etc… whereas the women sit on other tables with the kids and discuss their things.

I think men and women shouldn’t sit next to each other because men like to have conversations that women don’t like, women also like to interject often about nonsense sometimes interrupting what we think is important. It’s a mess.

Obviously at home with only your wife it’s different, I get that.

As the case unfolds, you start to realize you may be the one truly responsible for the victim’s death—it was an accident, and no one suspects you. But the evidence will almost certainly convict the man on trial. You’re about to have your first child, and confessing could destroy your life. If you stay silent, an innocent man will go to prison.

Do you vote “Guilty” and keep your secret, or “Not Guilty” and risk exposing yourself?

(Inspired by the movie Juror #2)

Hmmm... 🧐 🤔

I have to censor j*ck for some reason. Sorry!

I’ve had probably a thousand matches over time and not a single one materialised. Yet women claim they are just looking for a ‘nice/genuine guy.’ No they’re not!!

They’re looking for something that doesn’t exist, or so far out of reach for them. Most guys are actually nice, they’re just not ALL super rich, 6’5, super models, and jacked like they think they see is common on social media

Women are too greedy. Till they have to settle at 30, when they’re already old. Women, they oversell themselves. Think they’re 10X what they are, they have failed us.

For example, No girl would’ve obsessed over JB if he wasn’t JB. It’s all about status/fame and just being too much of an outlier

I am already exceptional with a big future and struggling. The whole dating game is so dead and boring. When I’ve rejected women - it’s for a good reason.

There is an apparent gender conflict going on that has polarised men and women with non binary usually tending toward the women's end that has created a lot of toxicity and relationship challenges that has seen a rise of things MGTOW and 4B away from interaction between the members of a social species because of political leanings about how society has treated and perceived injustices between each side that seem to ignore the others points of view.

Given that women tend to be the victims of sex based crime but men are of crime in general (while also ignoring reasons why it's also men who end up in a life of crime as well as making up most of the low status positions and as victims of societies lack of provisions for those in need such as homelessness, poverty, destitution, domestic violence, etc.) the current narrative is that women negatively prejudice against men they don't know as threatening or risky until a man proves himself to not be so while women are not regarded similarly.

So should employment be restricted in a similar way that women can request a female doctor for consultation, that men should therefore be appraised on their suitability for jobs by other men instead of having mixed or women only employment panels. (One could use the same notion that women getting jobs over men because they're more appealing to the eye and thus able to use that attraction for a business as being a valid reason for employing them in the first place)

Why or why not?

The law of the jungle: the principle that those who are strong and apply ruthless self-interest will be most successful

Underrated movie I thought. Late to the party. Found it in my queue. Def glasses for me.