Questions

1, some people these days, try to link #palestine name to ancient philistines, as if same tribe but even that would not help the claim.

those who live in germany are germans and same type of name if live in palestine part of ottoman. just name of land, not the same family.

2. Even if we assume just for a moment: plistim is plistim still -not the canaan who israel expelled from west bank in 1000 B. C. named in the record part: genesis 10:4-17.

misraim was brother knan. from knan jebusites but plistim from misraim egypt. not same family. so even if say trick: "same name" still not the dwellers. just a trick.

israel conquered "canan the jebus' but plistim is different family. the jew war was when wars were recognized as conquering. like muslim conquest was not condemned at the time. until now.

3. also archeology challenged. archeology found signs of war in other ancient places but not in the time of joshua! the stories were just action fiction. ancient people knew those parts were fiction.

the writers knew it was fiction and wrote clues: authors added 'not with your sword' in book joshua 24. it seems a contradiction but it really helped label the war stories as fable. even the "war" of amorite

they lived side by side: book judges. not a self contradiction it is the "fiction label" for the fable war parts.

but which family? i say arabs are ismael. not pilistim and not the knan from whom israel in story conquered.

muslim celebrate "ed el adha" agree with me they are from ismeal. but ismeal not same family as knan! 3 separate tribes.

we see the arab claim, of land, is many steps away. just twisted and warped as a costume for jew hatred to cause hating jews wrongly and unreasonably. we see: far from any sensible claim. just 'names sound similar' is nonsense so which family?