What is considered "highly sensitive" is subjective depending on the definition, person's location, social circles, personal experience, etc. You've woven the answer into your question by defining it as abnormal, of course women will say no.
To be emotionally there is a good thing, but to cry about every little thing is not a good thing even for a girl. I cry if a movie moved but it's not like I full out snutt and hulking.
I think women like the made up hollywood version of men being sensitive which is completely different from actual men actually being sensitive which they don't like.
Okay stick with your notions and all that "your generation" condescending crap. But I see differently. Men are also human so they do have emotions as well. They're not a bricks of stone. And one of the worst things to do is bottle up those emotions.
I did. You know exactly what I’m saying and exactly what my point is and I’m not going to argue over semantics.
We’ve breed an entire generation of feminized and pussified males and it’s disgusting and needs to be called out for what it is and it’s not ok and you know that.
It’s harmful to men and you know that as well, so let’s cut the crap and stop pretending this is normal. It’s not.
It’s also harmful to women as it only ensures the masculine qualities that women are attracted to in men are decreasing more and more leaving less sexually desirable men for you to breed with... if you want to look at this from an evolutionary perspective. If you want to look at it from a psychological perspective it’s not natural for men to act like women, and women are emotional, not men. It’s teaching men to act like women. If you want to take a religious perspective this should cover the 3 monotheistic religions:
“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, these may forget, yet will not I forget thee.” Isaiah 49:15 ASV
Women are depicted here to be nurturing and compassionate, particularly to their own children. That is in their nature. It’s a maternal instinct. That is feminine in nature. See? Feelings. Touchy feely - feminine not masculine.
“Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.” 1 Corinthians 16:13 ASV
“Quit you like men” in the Old English vernacular meaning - act like men. Men are depicted as being strong here. Standing fast in the faith. What does it mean to “Stand Fast” it means to refuse to be defeated. This is equated with masculine behavior and attributed to men here. Not women. Not the feminine. Well, if someone was “emotional” in the sense of the askers question does that lend itself to being strong and refusing to be defeated which is equated here to being like men, or in other words masculine. NO.
So any way you want to look at it: religious or secular, evolutionary, psychological and sociological because as humans are either designed or evolved which ever view you choose, masculine behaviors are not being overly emotional which does not lend itself to being perceived as masculine by women and therefore sexually desirable and therefore does not lend itself to the propagation of the species, so even sociologically this does not lend itself to reproducing and sustaining society and all related to society such as governments and the building blocks of nations which are families.
So any way you want to cut it, this his not good for men. It’s harmful to men. It’s also harmful to women in not having partners desirable for mating and capable of being good hunters and gathers and harmful to male and female children as not having a male parent acting masculine and developing male children as they need to be and discipline and logical thinking being imparted also to female children. It causes female children to be insecure and have an unstable self image when both parents are very emotional.
So this is harmful to both sexes and men being encouraged to be emotional is in fact morally wrong and wrong in terms of science, reproduction, and sociologically.
You know that instinctively despite what they may teach in schools or the media may promote. So... let’s not do that and let’s cut the crap and let’s teach men it’s not ok to be emotional and that they need to be physically and mentally and emotionally strong and not to be overly emotional and let’s not argue nonsense.
Because the bottom line is you can offer a retort if you like but there is no ground left to stand on to refute my point which is that it’s harmful for men to be taught to be emotional and certainly overly emotional and it needs to cease from being taught and promoted as “good” immediately.
Tbh I think that's something that wrong with them. They hate emotional guys and only want tough ones, they say we are too picky when they only want attractive tall guys that have no emotions.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
28Opinion
What is considered "highly sensitive" is subjective depending on the definition, person's location, social circles, personal experience, etc. You've woven the answer into your question by defining it as abnormal, of course women will say no.
Nothing turns pussy as dry as the deserts of Sahara faster than this.
We were indoctrinated to keep it all inside for that very reason.
Sensitive, when appropriately. Highly sensitive? Turn off.
It would. Although I want a sensitive man, I don’t want a HIGHLY sensitive man. Can’t deal with an emotional bitch when I’m already one 😤😂😂
I do like men who are in tune with their emotions and feelings to some degree.
I'd rather that than a psychopath.
To be emotionally there is a good thing, but to cry about every little thing is not a good thing even for a girl. I cry if a movie moved but it's not like I full out snutt and hulking.
i love highly sensitive men because they show vulnerability. there is strength in showing vulnerability
Agreed!
❤️ love people that don’t hide their feelings
Yeah! And its funny how these stupid teen girls think they being sensitive makes them work with an insensitive dude
I think women like the made up hollywood version of men being sensitive which is completely different from actual men actually being sensitive which they don't like.
Sensitive is fine but highly sensitive can be annoying even for women
It's fine with me unless the highly sensitive translates into volatile.
I want to see what the girls are saying. Good question
Women like the idea of men being sensitive towards them in a relationship and a hardass to everybody else.
No they dont. I have hypersensitivity, its a condition, and girls dont like that. Also more women than men have it.
only if he's highly sensitive to her demands. other than that they want a robot
No , they look down on them if anything and are irritated by them
Highly sensitivity does but not regular sensitivity. Sensitivity itself is not a bad thing but too much of anything is bad.
No. If anything it's a turn off. They like strong, confident, guys.
You can be strong and confident and vulnerable and emotional
No you can’t. Those are opposites and this is what feminism is teaching men. It’s pure bs and you can’t be both and shouldn’t be.
I know people in your generation push that line... but it’s a bunch of cock and bull.
Men should be tough and strong and confident and not emotional and not vulnerable and not share feelings and all this touchy feely horse crap.
Okay stick with your notions and all that "your generation" condescending crap. But I see differently. Men are also human so they do have emotions as well. They're not a bricks of stone. And one of the worst things to do is bottle up those emotions.
Yeah yeah yeah. Let’s all us men get in touch with our feminine sides and start wearing maxi pads.
I’ll stick with my notions thanks.
Who the fuck ever said having emotions is feminine?
I did. You know exactly what I’m saying and exactly what my point is and I’m not going to argue over semantics.
We’ve breed an entire generation of feminized and pussified males and it’s disgusting and needs to be called out for what it is and it’s not ok and you know that.
It’s harmful to men and you know that as well, so let’s cut the crap and stop pretending this is normal. It’s not.
It’s also harmful to women as it only ensures the masculine qualities that women are attracted to in men are decreasing more and more leaving less sexually desirable men for you to breed with... if you want to look at this from an evolutionary perspective. If you want to look at it from a psychological perspective it’s not natural for men to act like women, and women are emotional, not men. It’s teaching men to act like women. If you want to take a religious perspective this should cover the 3 monotheistic religions:
“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, these may forget, yet will not I forget thee.”
Isaiah 49:15 ASV
Women are depicted here to be nurturing and compassionate, particularly to their own children. That is in their nature. It’s a maternal instinct. That is feminine in nature. See? Feelings. Touchy feely - feminine not masculine.
“Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.”
1 Corinthians 16:13 ASV
“Quit you like men” in the Old English vernacular meaning - act like men. Men are depicted as being strong here. Standing fast in the faith. What does it mean to “Stand Fast” it means to refuse to be defeated. This is equated with masculine behavior and attributed to men here. Not women. Not the feminine. Well, if someone was “emotional” in the sense of the askers question does that lend itself to being strong and refusing to be defeated which is equated here to being like men, or in other words masculine. NO.
So any way you want to look at it: religious or secular, evolutionary, psychological and sociological because as humans are either designed or evolved which ever view you choose, masculine behaviors are not being overly emotional which does not lend itself to being perceived as masculine by women and therefore sexually desirable and therefore does not lend itself to the propagation of the species, so even sociologically this does not lend itself to reproducing and sustaining society and all related to society such as governments and the building blocks of nations which are families.
So any way you want to cut it, this his not good for men. It’s harmful to men. It’s also harmful to women in not having partners desirable for mating and capable of being good hunters and gathers and harmful to male and female children as not having a male parent acting masculine and developing male children as they need to be and discipline and logical thinking being imparted also to female children. It causes female children to be insecure and have an unstable self image when both parents are very emotional.
So this is harmful to both sexes and men being encouraged to be emotional is in fact morally wrong and wrong in terms of science, reproduction, and sociologically.
You know that instinctively despite what they may teach in schools or the media may promote. So... let’s not do that and let’s cut the crap and let’s teach men it’s not ok to be emotional and that they need to be physically and mentally and emotionally strong and not to be overly emotional and let’s not argue nonsense.
Because the bottom line is you can offer a retort if you like but there is no ground left to stand on to refute my point which is that it’s harmful for men to be taught to be emotional and certainly overly emotional and it needs to cease from being taught and promoted as “good” immediately.
Big fan of the results since I'm dead inside 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
All I know is they want non-emotional tough tall buff guys.
Girls dont like emotional guys, or guys that are in touch with their emotions.
Tbh I think that's something that wrong with them. They hate emotional guys and only want tough ones, they say we are too picky when they only want attractive tall guys that have no emotions.
When i dont show emotion i have aspd. If i do show emotion i have hsp. I can never win.