
Yes he deserved it
No what happened to Free Speech
see poll ( Who the hell is Andrew Taint? )
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

Probably not. I don't know the whole details, but what little I do know of Andrew Tate is that he's a POS and an asshole. And if you're going to ban every asshole off of Facebook and Twitter, then no one would be left on there.
So unless he was telling people to kill themselves or outright scamming them (besides Hustlers University), then he probably shouldn't have been banned.
I didn't even know who Andrew Tate was until three weeks ago. He's not anyone important. And if you don't know who he is, that's normal. But the "short" version is,
he's a former MMA fighter who scams weak men into expensive masculinity courses like Hustlers University, beats on women, and had to flee the US due to criminal charges.
He's technically a millionaire, but only from being a con artist and all-around scumbag. I don't even disagree with some of the things he says about women, but he is a legitimate misogynist (not the SJW use of the term, the actual definition of one) and straight-up scammer.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/j4g2uuCeSPsI don't know who he is and I doubt if I would agree with him on much.
But I don't think social media giants have any more right to ban content than should telephone companies. These totalitarian corporations are essentially creating laws and enforcing them. They are the means of subverting constitutional rights.
These social media companies have ideological agendas. They operate as instruments of social engineering by pushing their own ideologies and censoring anything that does against their preferred narrative. They are evil propagandists.
FUCK them and their vague so-called community standards. I'd like to see them sued out of existence for practicing journalism without a license. I'd like to see their owners and executives imprisoned in Gitmo for crimes against humanity and treason against the USA.
Fuck "woke" bullies who want to punish anyone they disagree with. I despise those authoritarian pieces of shit. They are the greatest danger to democracy and freedom. I love seeing them crying inconsolably while praying for death.
I mean, his opinions aren't even his opinions. It is just stopping the spread of shock value. I feel bad for the manipulable men who are insecure and seeking guidance from a man who couldn't care and wishes the active worst for them. I want men to know that being a true man isn't blindly following another's lead. Do you think Andrew Tate would pay money and waste his time following another man? No, he would call that person a bitch. Just be genuine and a good person, that is what makes a man. Whether is is fair, I don't know, though it is a good move on a business stand point for both social media platforms. Andrew Tate above all people should respect that, his whole existence is to get attention then subsequent money. That existence seems hollow and lonely in my eyes.
The thing about free speech is the goverment can't hold what you say against you... unless maybe it's some form of terroristic attack/ you threathening the president/white house. Other than that, what you say can still get you very much in trouble with others and has consequences.
It's slippery slope, people don't want certain people just saying anything cause in the past that has caused a wide spread fear or hate against a certain group of people. But people are also worried about censorship becoming a normalized thing even if it's something not shocking like what this man says. Anyway what did he say that got him officially banned from both sites?
Opinion
49Opinion
I don’t know who that is or why they’re “banned”. However, considering it’s FB, it’s almost certainly NOT “fair” by any stretch of the imagination.
Ell oh ell! All these clowns talking about this guy because he says things publicly. I bet none of them are wondering why feminists spewing hate speech and calling for violence against men AREN’T getting banned. Hypocrisy so dense it makes diamonds look like toilet paper.
Yeah it’s fair. They can do what they want.
Oh but the oil companies can’t do what they want?
Fair or not fair, NO ONE should be banned from any social media platform; UNLESS that person is violating any human right. People should have a right to say whatever they want. I mean that's the essence of social media. Right!!. If the shoe fits, wear it. simply that. If someone knows oneself, why would they allow external opinions to deter them from doing whatever they want. That's BS. This Tate guy says stuff basing on his ideas of success - maybe if he's backed up by some research of some sort. Often times out of every bad thing usually there's some slight good in it. Just as for every lie there is some titbit truth behind it. I, personally, don't mind him saying whatever he wants to say. I just like his confidence. Man, dude is insanely confident.
So whoever feels offended by Tate, just take heart. Just like fingerprints, each one is in their own race of life. Live your life according to how to want it. You owe no one no shit. Ummm, for those who don't know Tate, oh he's one helluva loud mouth kinda guy. Yeah i said it. ~xoxo~
I don't care, he's an ignorant peice of shit, and some men going through a hard time that hear his trash opinions will start to think like him too, and we don't need any more like him.
He dosent have a right to be on those platforms, no one does. Sure the platforms are usually biased and block what they disagree with and push things you may not agree with, but it's their right too, Don't like it, leave the platform.
I know twitter is trash and off the rails, that's why I don't go there.
I don't give a shit about him, I also don't care what Facebook or Instagram approves of, it's just not my problem.
I don't even know what he did, I heard about him, listened to him, then stopped cause he's a toxic asshole.
Fair? If he violated their guidelines then obviously there's consequences. I don't know why that is so hard to grasp for so many. It has nothing to do with "censorship" or "freedom of speech". These are terms that right-wingers are obsessed with without even understanding them.
That being said, Andrew Tate is a fascist psychopath, extreme misogynist, and a literal human trafficer. If I was running a social media site, I wouldn't even allow someone like that to be on my site to begin with. Just like I wouldn't allow members or sympathizers of ISIS or Neo-Nazis on my site. That's not "censorship", that's common sense protection.
People saying yes just want to take the back door and not debate why he is wrong. Just do the typical tyrannical thing and ban and censor.
And to anyone losers that say: "THeYrE a PrIvAtE cOmPaNy, ThEy CaN dO wHaT tHeY wAnT!" There is a huge difference between banning people for inciting violence, threats of violence or promoting illegal activity versus banning people because you don't like what they are saying. You're no better than people like Hitler, Stalin or Mao in that regard.
Clementine ford, why she's not banned for saying men are worthless all the time?
Misguiding women to hate men talking about Patriarchy oppressing women when it's not the truth.
Patriarchy and men invented the tampons, Men died for women and children to see this day? Even now in Ukraine men are protecting their homeland, women and children. It's not feminists on the frontline.
Cher: Do you think men are important? went viral saying ''Like for what?''
And SO MUCH MORE on media painting men bad.
Men suicides are at an all time high.
Do Women care... Do feminist care? No. So that says a lot about feminism.
Andrew Tate felt sorry for men. If Tate is bad then Feminists are the worst.

There's a lot of stuff he says that's true and it exposed society and society doesn't like that. Women obviously won't like it but this just proves men and women are diffferent. We're not the same and nor do we think the same. a lot of men hold the sane views as Andrew tate but are too scared to say it because you have to be careful and watch what you say that involves women and society even if you make good points. You're supposed to shut up and never question anything or go against anything society tells you to believe in. If you're gonna cancel him, you have to cancel other people that spew quote "hate" about men. You can't pick and choose who gets a free pass just because of their gender
I don't know. What did he do to warrant the ban? Did he actually break the law? I ask, because if he didn't, if all he did was express an unpopular opinion, then no, it isn't fair at all. Bad ideas need to be exposed to the fresh air of public criticism and debate, not smothered through censorship.
Looking up some info
So from what I understand, yes its fair and very likely something he was working to get
His playing a character and doing so well
Getting his fame, and getting his clicks
with a ban in place he just got a huge poblicity
As known "There is no bad poblicity"
We will see if this one even stick
I will say how ever at least some of the things he said are most likely encraging to bad actors out there
Those are private entities so they are within their rights to ban him.
That being said, any entity that bans people based on words cannot legitimately claim to support the maximized free spread of ideas. I am against *any* ban on speech, regardless what that speech is.
No. Basically to silence someone's free speech you just claim its hate speech.
It makes the media vary obvious they want only certain agendas on their platforms
I don’t agree with everything Mr. Tate has to say, but thankfully his opinions don’t affect my life. Though Tate still has every right to his thoughts just as I do my own.
Tate is not the 1st to be kicked off social media for having his own thoughts voiced and probably won’t be the last either.
The media is a vicious cycle.
I don't agree with him at all and I think they had every right to ban him but it doesn't sit right with me to ban people. But he had it coming anyways
I first heard of him on here from some woman hating incel. As I understand it he attacked a woman with a belt and he posts stuff promoting violence against women. I think any woman who's been attacked by a follower of Tate has a case to sue him.
The woke ass pink accounts and pathetic virgin simp blue accounts love censorship and silencing anything they don’t like.
The logical blue and pink accounts that aren’t afraid of the truth know that censorship is bullshit and people (mostly women) need to get thicker skin.
I learned about him on here few days ago and well deserved.
He was just talking bullshit and I respect instagram for saving the brains of little boys and girls. He doesn't deserve a platform.
I don't know who this guy is.
Lately Facebook has been banning normal people from its platform, I have friends who are systematically banned, or blacklisted as shadow bans etc because they say different things from the left woke norm or the Putinian right-wing norm. Facebook is doing everything to lose users and will eventually make it.
I don’t like Tate and don’t agree with the stuff I’ve seen him say in some videos (though I did watch it on twitter so it could be taken out of context, I don't know), but I don’t agree with censorship
I just heard of him for the first time a few weeks ago and did some digging for myself and yeahhhh lol. I can absolutely see why he was banned. And while freedom of speech is a thing, freedom from consequences is not.
@chris_987 like I said, freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. That goes for everyone.
"Freedom of speech" is there to protect unpopular speech. It has to purpose to protect popular speech. "Freedom from consequences" is just what people say when they don't actually support free speech and just want censorship for things they personally dislike. It's the same as saying "Cancel Culture doesn't exist, it's consequence culture."
And no, I don't like Tate one bit and he can get raped by a rhino for all I care. But you can't have it both ways.
@chris_987 if you're argument is "girls do it too" then you'll be arguing with yourself.
@MCheetah popular speech or not, there are consequences. Saying that doesn't mean I support censorship.
@ShaTTeredMasterpeace
The "consequences" are supposed to be somebody gets offended and you can choose to care about their hurt feelings or not. At worst, you might lose popularity and support with fans and lose some your income. The "consequences" are never supposed to be somebody single-handedly ending your career because they're a whiny pussy who can't handle words. But I know; society is full of pussies like that nowadays.
@chris_987 "protected class" ? Did you seriously just refer to women as that? The same women that are too afraid to walk down the street without pepper spray because men will kidnap and take them? And then probably dismember them when they're done? You've got to be fucking kidding me. Stop whining dumbass you sound stupid AF. If you wanna get pampered by some obedient woman, go back to live with mommy. Goofy ass
@chris_987 "all you did was prove my point 🤓" literally where? You still sounding mad goofy
@MCheetah on his own platform maybe but he's on someone else's and the consequences are left up to them.
@chris_987 nope sorry. Violence against women and children is up too because of men. We have every right to act the way we are.
I don't know...
I don't know the Facebook guidelines nor what this person has done there
but Facebook is a private company, so "fair" does not mean much in this context, lol
No, but while he is an outsider, he is also quite overrated. Much like with Trump, there are a few bad apples that support Tate and are actually racist/misogynist/etc. But those two people are not who the idiots that happen to support them are.
I find it so funny how the women who complain about men like him also whine about incels
like who else is gonna teach men how to be men? NOT WOMEN🙄 so stfu wtf do you know about masculinity when you don’t even understand men
and as far as the banning they’re just making things worse this ban will backfire just like Jordan Peterson they’re only making him more popular this won't silence him 🙄 so dumb
Andrew tate doesn’t even share or advertise his own content OTHER PEOPLE DO!
@MCheetah Thats something else whatever he does in his personal life is his business I’ve Never heard Andrew Tate tell a lie the man gives great advice that keeps young men from getting hurt and improve themselves and they never talk about the good he has done (like getting orphaned children off the street in Romania) just like trump people only focus on the bad that’s why celebrities walk on eggshells and it pisses me off because people find out something about a person and say “you’re terrible you did BLANK” but I guarantee everyone pointing fingers have done stuff just as bad or worse
He's free to say what he wants as long as it doesn't offend anyone thats what he doesn't get. Ur an influencer u defend in the people for ur income respect them and they respect u regardless of gender.
Lol at that gender ratio. I don't know who Andrew Taint is, but seems his takes suck massive shit if this many men on GaG wanna suck his dick so bad.
It's silly. The amount of toxic content from both men and women on social media is toxic to both genders. You can't ban them all. Truth is, if someone wants to seek his content, they will.
I know everyone nowdays is fond of the idea of free speech and equality but I personally thinks he's misogynistic bastard and he should've seen this coming.
He's raising a generation of toxic men.
Women and the way they act are raising a toxic generation of men. U think Tate woke up one day like that or he responded logically to the incentives that society is placing on him?
@Intothevoid666 no sorry you’re a weak excuse for a human. Maybe if the dads stuck around that wouldn’t happen so much. There’s also a steep rise in violence against women and children because of men. So shut your red pill mouth.
@Intothevoid666 suuure keep coping red pill. Ever think maybe it’s because there are so many mean men, that that’s bound to happen? Ever think maybe blame the man instead of women?
@Intothevoid666 also burn in hell for standing up for a guy who is part of the reason there’s an increase in violence against women and children. He’s so much more worthy than someone actually doing good.
I will say that "Free Speech" means that speech cannot only rarely be censored by the US government. Privately owned web platforms can censor anything they choose.
I still have no idea who that is or why people keep posting about him, I keep thinking they’re referring to the guy on American Horror Story. I guess he’s some kind of relationship “advice” person that makes him come off as a fuckboy?🤷🏻♂️
Freedom of speech is there, but he's plain hateful. How would you like it if she said guys who earn less than 1billion are plain worthless? Exactly how we feel about Andrew!
When the Internet was new back in the 90s, we used the “block” button to handle obnoxious people. The system worked really well, as the trolls found themselves barking into the wind.
Predictable. The more the elites ban people they disagree with the more powerful they make them and the less control they have over them. It’s an act of desperation from a dying system.
I've never heard of this guy and I don't think I want to know what he does either. Seems like a grifter.
I’m sure he’ll get it back and I hope he does.
He’s so spread out and known now that it’s impossible for him to get canceled.
Ok so I know he's an ass and had some "interesting" views from what I saw randomly online but was he doing that much damage to humanity that he needed to be banned?
that dude needs to just disappear back into irrelevancy already. im sick of hearing about his stupid ideas. its obvious he's an insecure wannabe alpha male anyways...
Men always think it’s free speech until it effects them. They even promote it. Men are losers anymore.
You're generalizing. I don't have an opinion on the subject but I see a-lot of generalizing from men and women on this post.
It's clear from Trump, you don't abide by the rules, you gtfouttaaa heaaa!
I keep seeing his picture but I don't know who he is. Who's this guy and what did he do so wrong?
they unfairly banned Trump back in 2021 despite him being the president. so I'm actually not surprised at all with these fascist leftists
It's hard to say, but after seeing a video of him brutalizing a woman I find I have very little pity for him
There's thousands of girls on Instagram who put out stuff way more toxic, but they don't get banned. If anything they get supported.
But God forbid a man pushes back against the war on men.
@Vendela that's a very convincing argument.
@Vendela That comment made you look just as toxic as anybody... regardless of who is right.
What did he even say to get him banned? It’s not something these fragile feminazis took offense to was it?
Literally just google the dude. He’s said too much to even try explaining it.
He didn’t post anything against their policies. The same thing with trump, they blamed it on ”people control”. In fact the media control the people, and this is a clear sign the media won’t let someone they don’t like control through their platforms.
As I've never heard of this guy, I'd conclude that Fakebook and Instagram are irrelevant.
I wasn't aware that he was banned. I really don't know much about him, though. I only first heard of the guy last week (here on GAG.)
of course 76% of women would say yes. Women and male simps love to cancel any man who speaks words that hit too close to home when it comes to female behavior.
You're generalizing mate. Careful to not let your emotions paint your words. I'm not on either side but both sides are doing it.
@BUTIMRIGHTTHO Ah stop being a simp. Social media is filled with women constantly trying to give dating advice and females claiming to understand male behavior. It's also filled with women constantly saying negative things about guys and yet none of them get cancelled because men just shrug it off and move on. Meanwhile, women will literally cancel you for doing the exact same thing and weak males will partake because they think their actions will reward them with sex/relationship if they do.
Make your own social media.
Nerds : 1
Tate : 0
Your freedom ends where another person's rights begin.
It's not as if he can just click his VPN and sign up again... Oh wait...
Lol that bald mf again... why do I see him frequently on here?
I don’t like him but did he do something so bad to get banned?
Yep, he’s actively promoting violence against women. Hate speech doesn’t fall under free speech 🤷♀️
Of course not, but anyone with half common sense knows why he’s banned or at least they should.
Do not care. FB and Instagram are sh*tshows of unnecessary drama.
No idea who he is. But by the Pic I'm just going to guess he's probably a douche.
Is he not rich? He can make his own "instagram". So far i know he violated the instagram terms and conditions. He should have read the conditions.
What Freedom of spech? Instagram is a private firm. Where is the freedom of a private firm?
In my opinion every radical incel or radical and feminazi should be banned.
I swear media is stupid. Andrew tate got what he wanted. I changed my mind!. He should not be banned because he got more attention like trump and by banning these people, their fans (?) create new sites etc to meet there aka end up being in a bubble which is dangerous since they become more and more radical there. These people should be 'exposed' to public and not banned and the public should react to them and discuss with them because this way they touch reality and realize that not everyone agree with them. So i am against banning any radical person or anyone
It is more healthy to have discussion to discuss with these people and with their followers or to reacr to these people instead of banning them
Andrew Tate is a LEGEND anyone that rattles feminist is a legend in my book✍️
What did this one do to offend the gods of social media?
They ban girls that show their ass on instagram, I’m sure it’s fair they ban a man who is enticing incels lol
What do u mean like every girl posts their ass on instagram?
You can also add your opinion below!