Do you think it was right of social media companies to ban Andrew Tate on their platform?

Anonymous

Andrew and his bro (Tristan) are what we call high quality men; their handsome, smart, ambitious and rich. They have multiple women thirsting after them and young men listening to their advice. Both bros live a lifestyle that follows the redpill philosophy before they even knew what redpill was.

Many people think Andrew tate is into sex trafficking but don't actually have proof of this and only heard about it from rumors. For those curious as to where it originated, he kicked a girl out of his home in England and threw her stuff out. The girl got salty and decided to make up a fake rumor that he was sex trafficking women. The cops found nothing but wanted to plant petty charges on him so he moved over to Romania where the country is less gynocentric.

Lately, a beta male that goes by the name daz, black decided to create a doctored videos of Tate to make him look like a rapist/abuser of women. He did this by posting out of context footage of Tate having role play/kinky sex with two women and making the claim that he was actually abusing them. Keep in mind that both women have publicly come out and said it was consensual.

[This is him above congratulating himself]

Needles to say this beta male thinks by doing this he will be rewarded with sex by women for his efforts.

We are seeing similar attack by weak men and women when it comes to any narrative that paint women in a less than positive light or hold them accountable for their action when it comes to current male/female relationship.

For example, a female MRA named Pearl was banned recently from tiktok by females because they didn't like what she was saying.

POLL QUESTION: Do you think the banning of Andrew Tate was just?

Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Do you think it was right of social media companies to ban Andrew Tate on their platform?
26 Opinion