A being, not really a being. He’s outside time and space. How can that be possible to know?
At least Bigfoot has some theoretical descriptors. Might be primate, definitely a mammal. Probably omnivore.

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News A being, not really a being. He’s outside time and space. How can that be possible to know?
At least Bigfoot has some theoretical descriptors. Might be primate, definitely a mammal. Probably omnivore.

WTF are you babbling about?
Something immortal cannot be inside a mortal space- and doesn't need to be. It will have all time and everything in it at it's disposal.
But you talk, as if people are something special and necessary on Earth. The Earth was billions of years old when you weren't even an itch in your father balls. It will still be here when you're worm food. Only your deeds and legacy will live on.
In your case it's not looking like it will be much.
It's simply a conscious being that has absolute control over the universe to the point where it can create paradoxes and other things that make absolutely no sense to us. To a deity reality would be its bitch, good thing they are just fictional huh?
What most refer to as "God" is the ultimate, non-contingent foundation of reality, the reason why there is something rather than nothing, and is the point at which no further explanations for why there is what there is is required.
Would be cool is God was like the lion from Narnia
Opinion
3Opinion
There is faith required to know of God (Christian) as there is faith required to know not God (Atheist).-Both are Religion.
There is faith in all assumptions and functions (sunrise/set; plane lifts and lands)...
Yes it is. One can not, NOT what is not, therefore, in saying there is no God you are admitting there is indeed a God. This is simple logic.
Dawkins did that in a debate and the Daily Beast in UK carried. He said, Oh my God” in the debate. Headline read God 1 Atheist 0. Since that Time strategy of Atheist has changed 🙃
It’s illogical and based on feelings rather than logical reasoning. Again with the “I” opinion. You are also confusing agnostic with atheist. It takes more faith to be an atheist than accept there is a First Cause, Creator given complexity in Science, Wotld, and Man. Absurdly, you obvious against the obvious that Aristotle, Plato, Pascal, Kant, Newton, Einstein etc professed…there is a First Cause Creator 🤷🏻♂️
If you want to know what God looks like look in a mirror he created man in his own image
Nobody knows.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!