Sins , laziness, all or nothing, and hypocrisy?

if a Christian, who has a holy book that contains the previous covenant (called old Testament) violates some prohibition in that o. t., or failed to do a ceremony , or does some but not all, do you think they are hypocrite? or a phony?

Updates
+1 y
a week later i see i failed to generate conversations. so i clarify.
ask about JEW, no question because if a jew violated bible, for example ate rabbit. that is a sin not hypocrite because he followed temptation. better to do part even if violated part. same for Christian regard new testament for example ate blood. sin but better to do part even if sin not "all or nothing"
in contrast a christian who ate rabbit is NOT a sin.
Updates
+1 y
according to new covenant the previous old testament "ended and faded" in several sources, matching jeremia chapter 31, so even if sin is not optional , still the o t. rules are not sin.
Sins , laziness, all or nothing, and hypocrisy?
Post Opinion