Do you believe in the supernatural?

[OddBeMe]

Yes

No

[Rosexøxø]

I don’t believe in the show. 🤫 lol

In the supernatural of this life? 🫢I still think it’s a no from me. I once tried to summon a sex demon in highschool years and it never came lol I truly just think it’s people’s minds that play games on them in random situations, and I found any who experience those particular ones are either strung up or having mental issues. So I’m glad I never saw one. Besides according to those who believe those- that type never leaves, but according to reality, if you’re hallucinating from psyche problems, it’s probably going to be irreversible in its own. So after that ultimate test, if you will, and when I was a kid praying to see angels 👼🏼 and never had, it just goes to prove the supernatural “realm” is a facade.

But if others WISH to disagree, they can.

[Rosexøxø]

I voted no

[OddBeMe]

How do know the sex demon never came?

[Rosexøxø]

… it’s like how do you not know that your pizza delivery guy never came or the microwave never beeped. Or your cat/dog/pet never came when you called it to you.

5 senses and all void.

Many testimonials if legitimate, shared their experience and the feeling of presence. Even in Christianity they talk about feeling the presence of the Holy Spirit/angels, or any malevolent spirit.

I think if they feel those it’s their own emotions and wishful thinking.

I think for the demonic and random people it’s their own psyche playing tricks or hallucinations.

There have been some good studies on that particular one and some correlations. The correlations are just too good to pass up for logic.

So I’m 100% sure I never encountered one. I’m too head strong as well to induce any type of hallucination and I have common sense. Another reason why it wouldn’t work for myself.

[Rosexøxø]

People have sleeping disorders. I don’t have that either and never needed medication for any such thing. People with sleeping disorders are more likely to encounter those and that’s kind of what that is.

[Rosexøxø]

It’s for immature people 🤷‍♀️. Healthy and mature people take care of their sleeping habits. They understand the importance of health. Meanwhile religious people (not all but most) and non-religious people who lack competency will neglect their health. It’s probably why they encounter so many demons and trials-

It’s poverty and lack of knowledge 🫢

[OddBeMe]

What’s the sex demons name?

[Rosexøxø]

I forget. Maybe incubus? I think so cause there should be a band by that too. Incubus drive 😂. I don't know why I always saw that coincidence as comical.

[Rosexøxø]

But the one usually “targeted” to males or hetero males is I believe succubus. It’s either that or have to swap the two.

[OddBeMe]

Incubus is a type…the female version for men is Succubus. I love demonology and their origins. Succ snd In. Lol

[Gothrocker]

Because I have always felt an energy around certain places. I believe in ghosts and an afterlife, some souls just haven't seen the light to go into. I don't believe in a singular god overseeing the entirety but multiple gods and goddesses, working in tandem.

[strateguy632]

but each is too weak to be god if another equal controls other stuff. at most those are angels. or valar semigods.

[Gothrocker]

@strateguy632 and?

[JacobJordan]

Hmmm I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it exists but I also haven't seen evidence to prove it doesn't exist I maintain that should proof be found one way or the other I am open to the existence of the supernatural though I remain skeptical

[OddBeMe]

That’s not how logic works.

Name anything else that demands we “prove it doesn’t exist”…. Bigfoot? No we just wait for evidence. Lochness? Nope. Same. Why god?

[JacobJordan]

If there is proof of existence then their is also proof of non-existence. I am not saying proof MUST be presented I am saying SHOULD proof be found for or against. Meaning it is optional. Here is a good example. The earth is flat (not actually) as such their must be proof of it being flat. By that same logic there is also proof that it isn't flat (curvature, spin drift, things like that) everything that operates under the heading of proof there must of necessity be sources to prove it is a thing and sources to prove it is not. If you reach out to touch a stove that has been off for hours and someone says it is hot you have 2 options. You can believe them. You can test it in which case you will find proof it is hot by it being hot. Or proof that it is not hot by it not being hot. For a thing to be true by necessity it proves that the opposing stance is false. As such if proof were found that God didn't exist it would prove that the claim God exists is false and the claim that God doesn't exist is true.

[OddBeMe]

You need a basic philosophy lesson. It’s called set theory. You make a claim, it needs proof. You don’t beleive until there’s evidence to. And even then it might change when more evidence comes in.

But by your rationale you’d have to believe in Bigfoot and lochness UNTIL someone can disprove it. Are you kidding me? You can’t disprove something that doesn’t exist.

[JacobJordan]

Whatever helps you sleep at night lol. Good lord literally felt the iq of the US plummet after reading your response

[goaded]

Settled.

https://xkcd.com/1235/

[OddBeMe]

Yeah but we have photographic evidence of god…

[DryGermanGuy]

Nah. The closest I come to that is believing in the Supra, natural. :-P

[OddBeMe]

If the doors don’t open like a delorean you won’t get laid.

[CurvyCandice]

So many cultures have identified and recorded supernatural records, Which led to the foundation of many religions and turning points for a few of them...




A Pregnant friend of mine used the
during her pregnancy, I thought it was a joke, but Now her kid is outsmarting all the kids in the kindergarten. I still think it was luck, but sometimes I doubt myself.

[OddBeMe]

Oh….. god. You haven’t sent anyone money have you?

[northerngal]

200 years ago an airplane would have seemed supernatural... so I am totally open to accepting that we are just scratching the surface of existence.

[OddBeMe]

Totally true. Theoretically, anything once discovered is natural.

[Razp_Sorbet]

Part of me doesn't want to completely dismiss the possibility maybe I hope it's true because there's some people id love to haunt 😂

[OddBeMe]

Haunting would be badass. Or just plain creepy voyeurism.

[isabellasv]

I don’t believe in it only because there’s no proof yet


Now Comment on the questions on my profile? 😊

[OddBeMe]

Done. She drives a hard bargain…

[throwmeaway1111]

I do, I've experienced some things that would make it hard for anyone to convince me otherwise. However, I do not believe that the Christian god exists in the way that people say he does

[Chazmatazz269]

Only in the sense that we tend to describe the perfectly natural that we don’t fully understand as the “supernatural”. It’s quite misrepresentative. That’s why i prefer the term “paranormal”.

[OddBeMe]

Ok, does the paranormal exist?

[Chazmatazz269]

Hahaha! Of course it does!

[AngryCarl]

Supernatural means "outside of nature", so by definition it can't exist.

[OddBeMe]

Pretty much. Nothing in science says it ‘can’t’…but yeah pretty much

[strateguy632]

some, so yes, but grouping the supernatural is just a dirty trick.

santa magic reindeer is not the same as demons! anti christian are nauseating!

[Daniela1982]

I believe in God, and that is the only thing that keeps me going. If not for Him, I would probably have ended my existence by now.

[OddBeMe]

Well I’m glad you have Him. There isn’t anything else in life worth living?

I mean I have a 9mm by my bedside and my wife is the only thing keeping me from using it.

[exitseven]

Yes, there are things in nature that we cannot perceive with our senses. Every once in a while we get a glimpse of it. It is not the spirits of the dead but it is definitely there.

[DextroShade]

Sometimes I will see certain objects, people, or places in a dream and then I will see them the next day or they will come up in conversation or on TV. Sadly it is useless and uncontrollable. I am a pretty lousy psyker.

[Sevenpointfive]

i don't think what i experienced was supernatural. i think it was metaphysical.

[OddBeMe]

So what you experienced was just a philosophical thought. Gotcha.

[Sevenpointfive]

are you a jackass? i was gonna let you say yes but i have told you this story before. i'm not going to recall it. the supernatural side of it will come through. i had a time split. i either saw an alternate reality or something that i can't explain. i was totally coherent.

but what i experienced was a wave. that wave caused me to move away and "watch/listen" to what was happening. it was the most confused i've ever been.

[DrPepper12]

There's no difference between superstition, faith, theism, astrology and horoscopes. They're all scams

[Xawyx]

I think there is a natural explanation for every supernatural event, we just don't have sufficient technology to explain everything.

[OddBeMe]

Agreed. And there’s a vexing paradox of if the supernatural were measurable.. it’d be by natural means…thus just natural.

[Iron_Man]

What is supernatural Donald Trump winning in November?

[OddBeMe]

Can you form your thought into…anything useful?

[Iron_Man]

With you everything’s about Donald Trump so that’s why I discuss it because I know that you’re Donald Donald Trump fan 😊

[OddBeMe]

Ahh, is he winning though? How many incumbents lost over past 50 years?

[Iron_Man]

Nobody wants to pay high prices from Joe Biden and it will just get worse

[OddBeMe]

Funny it’s only gotten better.

[Iron_Man]

So food gas and rent and houses have dropped in your opinion and everything else is under control? Where have you been living at?

[OddBeMe]

The rapid inflation has.

[NathanDavis]

supernatural believes in me

[7Phoenix7]

Yes I believe in you

[OddBeMe]

The show that should have ended long ago or spiritual realm?

[NathanDavis]

I'm a show out...

[OddBeMe]

What’s a “show out”

[Juxtapose]

Not at all. There's no evidence.

[Marred0710]

I believe cause I've seen things I can't explain

[sheenagwapa]

my dreams are supernatural so yeah

[Dargil]

On the fence about it.

[electromagnetic]

I don’t.

[hayati862024]

Yes I Believe

[PA19062024]

Yes, I do.

[OddBeMe]

Despite no evidence?

[PA19062024]

No evidence? Are you serious? Where do I even begin? Search 'veridicial NDE's' for starters, for evidence for the reality of the afterlife from those who have actually been there.
In any case, the term 'supernatural' simply refers to anything beyond the natural. Do you believe that the observable universe is all there is? That nothing could possibly lie beyond it?

[OddBeMe]

Oh near death experiences. So. That’s near death. And neurologists also point out how the brain triggers hallucinations and happy chemicals to make it not so bad. So not sure of any real data there.
www.scientificamerican.com/.../

[PA19062024]

The term "near-death" was simply coined by Dr. Raymond Moody in 1975 because he wanted a neutral-sounding term for the phenomenon he was studying at the time, but the reality is that most of these people were actually dead, and then brought back to life. And no, these are not "hallucinations" caused by brain activity, or "chemicals". Chemistry doesn't explain this, because what people describe is FAR more real to them than this "reality" (which, by the way, isn't), and in the veridicial NDE's they demonstrate knowledge of events they could not possibly have known about at the time because they were literally dead.
It's okay, I understand why materialists have such an emotional investment in their (false) worldview. You need to believe not for reasons that make sense, for reasons that are actually rational, but because you can't face the reality that what you do here and now in this life has consequences.

[PA19062024]

"The challenge, then, is to explain NDEs within a natural framework." - From your linked article. You see, they're not interested in the truth, but in trying to explain the NDE phenomenon away. They want to find a naturalistic explanation for it, but there isn't one, because this phenomenon is supernatural; it's evidence of more to reality than just this clown-show dream we're stuck in.

[OddBeMe]

You are taking a lot for granted. Like what these people who already believe in an afterlife “feel” during a heart attack. And they obviously didn’t die because…they didn’t.

Near death phenomenon is the most overrated religious “evidence” there is. At least go with quantum entanglement or universe have a cause…that doesn’t get you closer but it’s less embarrassing.

[PA19062024]

You clearly haven't studied this, you don't understand NDE's and the people who have them. This isn't about "feelings"; it's about uncovering evidence for an objective reality that exists beyond this one. These aren't dreams, they're far more real than that.
Embarrassing? Do you know what's truly embarrassing? Your shocking ignorance of this topic. You think you understand it, but you don't. As for "quantum entanglement", that's meaningless. Entanglement isn't evidence for anything beyond this world, or the supernatural, or anything else that should interest anyone. It's purely physical; that's what QM is, a description of nature at a certain level.

[OddBeMe]

You say objective reality, but are using subjective experiences to study it. See the issue?