Why is the book of Enoch not included in the Bible canon?

[Anonymous]

[ChicoFromThe305]

Well it's a prophecy that people will alter the Bible, weither that's already happened or the book of enoch was false, I think knowing what the book of enoch speaks about isn't a bad thing, not fully putting your faith on it like I did but still being aware and knowing it's knowledge just in case I don't think I can go wrong with that, the truth is I don't know how I feel about the book of enoch but something I can't just completely ignore is how in the actual Bible it mentions how enoch was the one of the only two to be taken alive by God and never experienced physical death, that credibility is just too interesting to ignore.

[strateguy632]

Because it's mentioned in book Jude, so that idea is good, but he never said the whole book is good. Book of Enoch can be like reading fiction but only holy books were included in bible.

[Asker]

I don't mind reading fiction but maybe reading the book of Jude along side it would be wise

[jennifer_bloom]

I do not believe the book of Enoch is morally or theologically correct because it says the elect become incapable of sin after they have been cleansed from fear and pride. I know for a fact, the elect and chosen ones are still capable of sin.

[Asker]

So you read it?

[jennifer_bloom]

Yes. I am curious about this type of thing and read it out of interest.

[abc3643]

That depends on who is determining the "canon".

For instance, the King James Bible is not the same as the Catholic Bible.

From Google AI...


The primary differences between the King James Bible (KJV) and a Catholic Bible are the number of books (canon) and translation choices. Catholic Bibles contain 73 books, including seven Old Testament deuterocanonical books (Tobit, Judith, Maccabees, etc.) excluded from the 66-book KJV. The KJV, a 17th-century Protestant translation, lacks these, which Catholics believe are inspired scripture. Key Differences Between KJV and Catholic Bibles:Canon (Number of Books): Catholic Bibles include 46 Old Testament books, while the KJV follows the Protestant tradition of 39, removing seven books (known as the Deuterocanon or Apocrypha). Deuterocanonical Books: The Catholic Bible contains Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch, plus additions to Esther and Daniel. These are absent or placed in a separate Apocrypha section in traditional KJVs. Translation Source: The KJV was translated in 1611, primarily relying on Hebrew and Greek texts available at the time. Modern Catholic Bibles (like the NABRE) often use original language manuscripts, while historically relying on the Latin Vulgate. Theological Vocabulary: Some KJV phrasing reflects 17th-century English Protestant theology, whereas Catholic editions, such as the Douay-Rheims or RSV-Catholic Edition, align more closely with Catholic doctrine regarding sacraments and tradition. Usage: The KJV is rarely used in Catholic Mass, while Catholic Bibles are approved for liturgical use. While the KJV is noted for its poetic, archaic language, it is considered an "incomplete" Bible for Catholic use because it lacks these specific books.

[abc3643]

The Book of Enoch (specifically 1 Enoch) is an ancient Jewish apocalyptic religious work, attributed to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah. Written between 300 BC and 100 AD, it is not part of the biblical canon for most traditions, though it is considered scripture by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. It details fallen angels (Watchers), giants (Nephilim), and Enoch's visions of heaven. Key Aspects of the Book of Enoch:Contents: It consists of five distinct sections, including the Book of the Watchers (explaining the fall of angels), the Book of Parables, and the Book of Heavenly Luminaries. Key Themes: The text focuses on the origins of sin, fallen angels (Watchers) taking human wives, the Nephilim giants, coming judgment, and visions of the "Son of Man". Authorship & Origin: It is considered pseudepigrapha, meaning it is written falsely under the name of the biblical patriarch Enoch and was not written by him, but rather over several centuries by different authors. Biblical Status: While respected by some early Christians and quoted in the New Testament Book of Jude (1:9), it was not included in the Bible. Discovery: Considered lost for centuries, it was rediscovered in 1773 and later confirmed by the discovery of Aramaic fragments among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The book is valuable for understanding Jewish thought between the Old and New Testaments, offering vivid details on apocalyptic scenes and cosmic mysteries.

[Asker]

Thanks for the info weather it's part of the Bible or not it sounds like an interesting read. The rabbit hole of you tube lead me down to this

[Master_Debator]

They excluded a bunch of books. Like you have to dig arount for the book of Ruth for instance.

The books got an edit when the Roman's adoptted it. Think of it as a group of youtube videos that make up a movement and you're the Roman looking at what helps your case... you expell certain youtube videos to further that cause.

Both the old and new testiments have that problem.

[Dargil]

Evangelical questions believe that the Bible authorized the church. Catholic Christians believe the church authorized the Bible. Councils of Catholic bishops settled on the 66 books we have Centuries ago. Meanwhile, The Ethiopian Coptic Bible which was the original, has 81 books. I wonder what extra things it reveals.

[Asker]

81 are you kidding?

[jshm2]

Because it didn't fit the White Christian narrative.

Hence why only the Black Christians included it in their bible.

You also need to remember the Ethiopian bibles were around before The Church was even a thing.

[Asker]

hmm 🤔 really

[robocop666]

many books are not included as they are not in their ideology

[TonyMetal___86]

Cause it's false!

[Asker]

Ok sure I read it for myself

[TonyMetal___86]

Than i guess you knew by now why it's false...

[Anonymous]

Try google