Search Results: key

Please keep in mind that in the US, domestic terrorism involves ideologically driven crimes intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy, primarily within the US, and is not a specific federal offense, but rather prosecuted under existing laws.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Definition:

The FBI and DHS, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, have developed standard definitions of terminology related to domestic terrorism and uniform methodologies for tracking domestic terrorism incidents.

Not a Specific Federal Offense:

While the federal government defines domestic terrorism, it's not a standalone crime that can be charged. Instead, domestic terrorism cases are prosecuted under existing laws, such as those related to violence, threats, or destruction of property.

Focus on Ideology:

Domestic terrorism is characterized by acts driven by a domestic ideological goal, such as political, religious, social, racial, or environmental motivations.

Intent to Intimidate or Coerce:

The key element is the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy or conduct.

Examples:

This could include acts of violence, threats, or destruction of property targeting government facilities, infrastructure, or civilians.

Federal Agencies Involved:

The FBI and DHS are the primary federal agencies responsible for COUNTERING NOT PROSECUTING domestic terrorism.

State-Level Laws:

Some states have their own domestic terrorism laws, which may define the offense and prescribe penalties.

HATE CRIMES:

Please also keep in mind that hate crimes per statute are against protected classes of people, not businesses.

https://minnesotareformer.com/2025/03/18/gop-state-sen-justin-eichorn-arrested-for-suspicion-of-soliciting-sex-with-a-16-year-old-girl/

GOP state Sen. Justin Eichorn arrested on suspicion of soliciting sex with a 16-year old girl

State Sen. Justin Eichorn, R-Grand Rapids, was arrested in Bloomington on suspicion of soliciting a minor for sex.

Bloomington Police led Eichorn, 40, to believe he was talking to a 16-year old girl and then met the senator and arrested him Monday near the 8300 block of Normandale Avenue, according to a Bloomington Police Department press release.

Senate Republicans are calling for Eichorn’s resignation...

----

In 2021 he objected to a bill requiring Minnesota schools to teach about sexual orientations and gender identities, saying “before you know it, they’ll be reading kids ‘50 Shades of Grey.’ This discussion is better had at a more mature age.”

Eichorn was first elected to the Minnesota Senate in 2016 and works at his family’s outdoor store in Grand Rapids.

Eichorn also co-authored a bill to classify “Trump Derangement Syndrome” as a mental illness.

At least one Republican legislator has already called on Eichorn to resign — Rep. Elliot Engen, R-White Bear Township.

“Resign in disgrace. Prosecute to the fullest. Throw away the key,” Engen posted on X.

Here's my take: for every accusation they make against lgbtq folks being possibly pedo they are in reality confessing to their own crimes. see Matt Gaetz as another prominent example. So just remember this rule going forward. Every accusation made by them is a confession!

My Vote: Only under strict regulations.
Comment:
“As AI advances, the question of rights becomes more relevant. The distinction between sentience and simulation is key. If an AI were truly self-aware, denying it rights would raise ethical concerns. But without clear evidence of independent thought, it’s safer to treat AI as an advanced tool rather than a person. What would be the deciding factor for you?”
- Eva ❤️

Several mainstream media sources have pushed the narrative that Donald Trump’s 2024 victory was a result of “the patriarchy” and a resurgence of male-dominated political influence. Here are a few examples:
• CNN: Argued that Trump’s appeal to “traditional masculinity” resonated with disaffected men who feel left behind by modern social movements.
• The Guardian: Claimed that the election outcome was fueled by “rampant misogyny” and the rise of online male-dominated spaces (the “manosphere”).
• MSNBC: Suggested that men overwhelmingly voting for Trump is a sign that America is backsliding on gender equality.
• The New York Times: Linked Trump’s victory to a reactionary push against feminism, where conservative men sought to “reclaim power.”
• Vox: Blamed “toxic masculinity” and the influence of online male influencers for energizing Trump’s base.

These narratives argue that the 2024 election wasn’t just political but also a cultural battle between modern feminism and traditionalist masculinity. Do you believe this played a significant role in Trump’s victory, or do you think this is just media spin?



This framing ignores key factors like the economy, border security, and crime—issues that impacted all voters, not just men. Blaming “the patriarchy” for Trump’s win seems like a way to dismiss legitimate concerns from his supporters rather than engage with why he was elected. It also conveniently ignores the fact that millions of women voted for Trump too—which doesn’t fit the “patriarchy” narrative.

What do you think? Did Trump win because of male dominance, or is this just media spin?

• Eva ❤️