Search Results: the point of giving up

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-juan-merchan-meek_n_642f2f27e4b0c2da1505ea78
Trump Attacks Judge From Afar, But Turned Meek When He Was In The Same Room

Donald Trump has attacked the judge in his criminal case from the safety of his Florida country club and on his social media platform, yet failed to raise a single word of complaint to Justice Juan Merchan’s face when he was seated just yards away at Trump’s arraignment.
“Yes.” “I do.” “Thank you.”
Those responses to Merchan’s questions made up half of the total words the coup-attempting former president uttered during the 45-minute hearing Tuesday at a courthouse in lower Manhattan. The first two words were the point of that initial appearance: “Not guilty.”

Trump’s other answers were to Merchan’s questions about whether he understood the instructions Merchan was giving him about courtroom rules and his attorneys.

Just hours later at his Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Trump delivered a 25-minute speech attacking the various prosecutors looking into his actions, and claiming without evidence that Merchan is biased against him.

“I have a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaign. And a lot of it,” Trump said to a crowd of specially invited supporters.

Trump had expressed the same sentiment in an all-caps post on his Truth Social site a few hours before entering the courtroom: “THE HIGHLY PARTISAN JUDGE & HIS FAMILY ARE WELL KNOWN TRUMP HATERS. HE WAS AN UNFAIR DISASTER ON A PREVIOUS TRUMP RELATED CASE, WOULDN’T RECUSE, GAVE HORRIBLE JURY INSTRUCTIONS, & IMPOSSIBLE TO DEAL WITH DURING THE WITCH HUNT TRIAL. HIS DAUGHTER WORKED FOR ‘KAMALA’ & NOW THE BIDEN-HARRIS CAMPAIGN. KANGAROO COURT!!!”

Sometimes I get “tough love” when it comes to questions, opinions or posts I put up.

Now I can tell the difference between someone who just gets off on being condescending or controlling vs. giving me tough yet selfless advice.

The former will usually immediately throw in insults, labels and almost never offers constructive logic on how to improve or why I might be mistaken. I will never listen to that nor take the seriously. Even if they might be right I will never be won over with insults (who would?)

That latter will take time to read my all the details of my question and will often ask more details before judging. When they criticize they don’t get any enjoyment out of it. Rather they use logic to cogently express how I could be wrong and use facts to back it up. I might not like what they are saying (and can be harsh) but it might give me pause if they bring up good points to support their argument

Anyway I hate to be sexist but I find that women struggle with ego more often then men when it comes to getting criticism on what they want to hear vs. NEED to hear. This is especially true in scenarios that involve cheating.

I also find that women have a harder time taking criticism when a political issue involves logic vs. emotion.