Search Results: male body parts

WITHOUT getting shamed?

According to SOME on here, it seems like we aren't allowed to have any - I've seen many on here who are very reasonable too, before anyone starts crying:

• If we want women to shave her body hair, we're petty, because it's 'natural' yet the same user is happy to be repulsed by a man who's balding or has a bit of a belly, despite those being natural, as we age.
• If a guy doesn't want to go down on his woman, he's gay and will get dumped.
• If we care about a woman's body, it's because we're 'ugly', yet one of them who shamed us, said she wouldn't date a male slut.
• If we want to date younger, '80-90%' of us are pedos, but women who date younger 'have options'.
• If we don't want to date a single mother, it's because we aren't 'quality men' who can handle it.
• If we complain about losing our assets in divorce, we're 'disgusting' and deserve it for being a 'POS husband'.

Some of the women's standards rule out the most men, but men aren't allowed to rule out any, not to mention the countless movements you have for women, basically shaming men or forcing them to accept women that they would otherwise find undesirable.

'Body positivity' - "accept me for being fat" - okay, but where's the one for short or fat men?

Let me guess, it's 'female nature' to be XYZ and male to XYZ - okay, but are you doing your own part by having kids or your other feminine duties? - Seems like men have to do their's at all times, but can't expect nothing in return to be a 'quality man' & women just want the leverage to feel superior.

There seems to be a theme to deflect accountability/have a different attitude towards shitty female behaviour vs male - instead, lets cry about F&F, KS & Tate, but not focus on the women who go choose to go on their shows & embarrass themselves or deluded women like little Miss cupcake who went on the Steve Harvey show. 😂

Actually answer the question instead deflecting & remember that I am talking about a few on this site.

Kind of a sequel to this question here. Things have been changed up a bit. Which one would you rather have, given these options?

You have a Genius Intellect with a 200 IQ and the potential to solve most non-personal problems in society, with a highly respectable (but not profitable) career, but will always undateable and seen as physically unattractive to everyone of the opposite or same sex (regardless of how you look in the mirror) and will never get married, and will die a virgin, no matter what.

You have a perfect-looking body that is seven inches taller the median height, naturally fit and powerful without exercise, naturally well-endowed (big boobs or dick), with perfect teeth, a 9.5 out of 10 flawless face that seems to stop aging after 25, and a 100 IQ, but will never be rich or wealthy and will never earn more than $43,000 USD a year. You'll always have to work a 9-to-5 job until retirement and can't marry/date anyone rich, either.

You have very wealthy and influential parents and have known wealth and extreme luxury your entire life and will never have to worry about being poor or finding work, but you are mentally (literally) retarded with an IQ of 70, have learning disabilities like Dyslexia or ADD, and are only median height with equal looks.

You reject all the above options, leaving this as the last and only choice left. You choose to be mediocre and all-around valueless to society (aka, average) with a male height of 5'10"/178 cm, or female height of 5'5"/165 cm, with 5 out of 10 looks, an average weight and body, subpar endowments (6" penis, or C-cup bust), with a 100 IQ, earning an average individual salary, with a spouse and two kids (one son and daughter), with a meaningless job and a ho-hum life in a small town somewhere. You will never be smart, never be attractive looking, and never be rich.