Search Results: is she a risk

A federal judge temporarily restricted access by DOGE to the Treasury payment and data systems, saying there was a risk of “irreparable harm.”

The Trump administration’s new policy of allowing political appointees and “special government employees” access to highly sensitive information such as bank details, heightens the risk of leaks and of the systems becoming more vulnerable.

Judge Engelmayer ordered any such official who had been granted access to the systems since Jan. 20 to “destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department’s records and systems.” He also restricted the Trump administration from granting access to those categories of officials.

The defendants — President Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the Treasury Department — must appear on Feb. 14 before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas.

If Trump fails to comply with the emergency order, it is unclear how it might be enforced. The Constitution says that a president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” but courts have rarely been tested by a chief executive who has ignored their orders.

Federal officials have sometimes respond with dawdling or grudging compliance. Outright disobedience is exceedingly rare. There has been no clear example of “open presidential defiance of court orders since 1865,”.

AG Letitia James of NY with 18 other Democratic state attorneys general, charging that when Trump had given Musk the run of government computer systems, he had breached protections enshrined in the Constitution and “failed to faithfully execute the laws enacted by Congress". They said POTUS had given “virtually unfettered access” to the most sensitive information to college kids who worked for Mr. Musk under DOGE.

Musk has publicly stated his intention to “recklessly freeze streams of federal funding without warning,”.

If federal officials fail to comply with the order limiting DOGE, he may hold them in contempt for fines & imprisonment.

Happens globally all the time... so then question becomes... where and why?

Trump Treasury Secy Scott Bessent dismissed concerns from Dems saying that exporters from China would lower their prices due to higher US tariffs adding any tariffs should be phased in so that any “price adjustment” could be absorbed gradually.

Economists forecast roughly $1,300 increase for households on average as US factories rely on inputs from Mexico & Canada.

The auto & electric equipment sectors in Mexico are most exposed to disruption & mineral processing in Canada. The largest risks to USA would be to farming, fishing, metals and auto sectors.

Trump has stated the ability of tariffs to protect domestic manufacturers. But on balance, most economists expect fresh trade barriers to raise prices for US businesses and households, which will lead to a temporary burst of higher inflation. How temporary depends on Americans’ expectations about future increases in inflation

"We don’t need what they have,” Trump said. He added that "tariff rates could increase over time" and suggested that the "tariffs might not apply to oil imports", a decision that could avoid an all but certain spike in gas prices.

While the US is the world’s largest oil producer, Canada refines the lighter US crude with heavier oil from places like Canada to make fuels like gasoline & diesel which is then re-inported. Roughly 60% of the oil that the United States imports comes from Canada, & about 7% comes from Mexico. As such, that total is 35% of the US daily consumption.

If Canadian refineries respond to the tariffs by cutting production, gas prices in the Midwest could climb 15 to 20¢ a gallon & smaller increases outside the region.

At the northern border, the flow illegal migrants skyrocketed in 2024. During that time, more than 23,000 arrests were made of migrants crossing illegally — 2 years before it was around 2,000.

Hope it's all worth it MAGA!

Is this what many men do? Give up authentic parts of who you are and your personality just so you have a real chance with the women to end up in a relationship or marriage? Altering yourself like that by destroying who you really are to not being truly yourself just so you have a relationship, marriage and or kids? Is not getting a relationship or marriage or the end of your bloodline thanks to you being your true self really so much worse than being with a woman loving you being your fake self and risk getting divorced and becoming a pay slave for when either she finds out you're not who she thought you are or you fall apart from imitating like that?

And before you say "What is this Nonsense? Men don't do that" what if i told you there are men, that don't show you that they've sacrificed parts of who they are as much as they don't show feelings? Point being you are probably unaware, that some men gave up parts of their personality and who they are and are actively putting up an impressive facade version of "manly man" of themselves for you girls. Anything just to be in a relationship or marriage or not risking the end of their bloodline.

You make an explicit rule per the law... teen step daughter with temporary drivers license can only drive car you own/insure when another adult is in the car. It's the law in this state.

The rule is communicated and understood, but is violated. You give notice this is not allowed... don't do that again ever! Ok!

The rule is violated again a month later, under permission of your spouse whom gave permission. There was no emergency, just a desire to drive, and the teen driver asks (forgets or doesn't care) as well decides it's ok to violate the rule (oops)... and drives by themselves. "It's only a short distance" would be the justification. "It's not a big deal".

...

Probability of being caught by police or accident is small... driver has lots of experience and cautious. However, they are hormonally off (PMSing... and historically, judgement is off at this time) and there is a dangerous intersection involved in the well known, 1 mile drive home.

Severity of punishment resulting from an accident is substantial. You face cost or jail...

A) Insurance will fight coverage in case of accident... since the teen was violating the law, they can wiggle out of paying in court... cost shifts to the owner of the car (you) and parent... if teen was at fault.

B) If teen is at fault in an accident and death/multi party occurred, the responsibility shifts to owner of the car (you) and parent. Owner of car (you) could face prison time. I'm not a lawyer, it's my understanding of the law... and it's a liberal state.

What should a good, responsible spouse do in this case?

How do you handle your spouse that disobeyed the rule... putting you at risk you don't want?

How do you handle your step child?

Welcome to being an adult, and real life...