Search Results: sex moves

From movies and tv shows all saying that men are trash, that only care about sex, buffoons that need a woman's intuition to guide them to outright sexist laws that punish men. A good example of misandry in society is Amber Heard and Johnny Depp scenario. Amber heard just had to say Depp abused her and inflict a minor bruise to her face in order for people to believe her. Society then turned on Depp and he got cancelled just from word of mouth. It took video/audio evidence + women coming forward to defend him to sway public opinion.

In other instances of harm against women (e. g. rape) even if the guy is proven innocent later, people don't care and will continue to view said male as a rapist. Example, Columbian student, Emma Sulkowicz, accused her friends with benefits of raping her. He was quickly deemed a rapist by his university and kicked out, just base on her word alone. After being found innocent, he received no compensation and was just told to move on with his life; while still being viewed as a rapist by those unaware of the final outcome of the case. Ugly to average men also have their rights infringe upon by just EXISTING. Benjamin Reeves, former CEO of peak industry was accused by a model, Simone Holtznagel of stalking her. He was dragged to court and they needed video evidence to show that everything Simone said was a blatant lie and did not happen.

We also often feminist show blatant misandry both online and in person. Feminist will rejoice and gain pleasure in seeing men suffer, discriminated against or even rejoice at hearing about men dying. There was even a peak point in society, where feminist were actively posting themselves with mugs, that read "male tears" when it comes to male suicides. And no one called them out on it, and it was allowed to trend.

Basically a woman from Houston, Texas went on break and took a snap of herself in the bathroom. She was then hailed (simped) by men and women for working a 9-5 job as a home depot employee rather than going the onlyfans route like so many other girls.

While Ariana Josephine received praise, she also faced substantial backlash for her comments, which were perceived as shading sex workers. Her remarks stirred criticism as they seemed to undermine the choices made by individuals working in the adult entertainment industry.

ILL NEVER MAKE AN ONLYFANS!!!

— Ariana🫧 (@ariijosephine) June 11, 2023

My daddy always told me ALL money ain’t GOOD money.

— Ariana🫧 (@ariijosephine) June 10, 2023

Ma'am people were just happy that you were working at Home Depot, pivoting in that internet attention to shade sex workers is not the move pic.twitter.com/NDfjdqGNol

— Brandon Bradford (@BrandonLBradfor) June 11, 2023

Some accused her of perpetuating a negative stereotype about sex work and lacking empathy for those who choose a different career path.

Do you think this girl is too pretty to work a 9-5?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/texas-bans-diversity-equity-inclusion-college_n_6473d06ee4b02325c5dbd2a5
Texas To Ban Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Efforts At Public Universities

Texas lawmakers have moved to shutter all diversity, equity and inclusion efforts at publicly funded universities in the state.

Legislators in both chambers approved the final version of Senate Bill 17 on Sunday and it is now headed to Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to be signed.

If approved, SB 17 would require Texas’ public universities to dismantle their DEI offices, programs and training in the next six months. The bill also bans institutions from mandating any DEI training as a condition of employment or admission to the university, and orders all hiring practices be “color-blind and sex-neutral.”

The legislation would not affect course instruction, faculty research, student organizations, guest speakers, data collection or admissions.

DEI offices have become a fixture on college campuses in recent years. Aiming to support students from diverse backgrounds, DEI departments often aid in recruiting faculty and coordinating mentorships, tutoring and other programs for underrepresented students. Critics say the programs stoke racial division and unfairly prioritize social justice over merit and achievement.