Search Results: alone

"Israel has no reason to stop the IDF created genocide. NONE. Their reputation is global trash. It will stay global trash and they know it. The world is distracted by the Trump irreality show and Bibi is the savviest operator of our generation - never let a good crisis go to waste.

Israel only needs one partner, and one partner alone, the United States, and at a more granular level, the Trump-MAGA Party. Israel will sacrifice ALL others in this ever evolving parasitic & symbiotic relationship.

Bibi / Likud's (there is no difference) primary plan now, is fourfold:

1) Continue to deeply intermingle Israel and America - so much so that you don’t know where one ends and the other begins.

2) Neuter the Knesset, the courts, the media, the arts & especially the secular electorate.

3) Fully scrap the Orthodox draft exemption under the guise of this 10/7 Hamas "extraordinary situation" while simultaneously avoiding responsibility for it's politically charged demise

4) Annex Gaza for development with Trump private companies in exchange for continued military, intelligence, diplomatic support."

TO BE CLEAR: The decision is for the parents alone, BUT do concerned relatives coming from a place of the best intentions, have an: Obligation? Duty? Task? Interest? Stake? of inquiring?

The most OBVIOUS AND CORRECT answer is NUNYA & GFY. AGREED! But SHOULD they volunteer their desires for the bundle of joy? Does their proximity to the infant permit a "pass" to do this? Is it ok if they preface it with: "It's your decision but..." or "I support your decision but I'm curious..." or "I care & that's why I'm asking..." or "Have you & X-in-law discussed vaccinating?" Is there a socially acceptable way to do this? Is their legitimate interest in the infants health a valid reason to risk a potentially emotional, awkward or severely damaging result to their relationship?