SHOULD grandparents/aunts/uncles express their PREFERENCE for the arriving baby, their relative, to be vaxxed? What is an acceptable outcome?

TO BE CLEAR: The decision is for the parents alone, BUT do concerned relatives coming from a place of the best intentions, have an: Obligation? Duty? Task? Interest? Stake? of inquiring?

The most OBVIOUS AND CORRECT answer is NUNYA & GFY. AGREED! But SHOULD they volunteer their desires for the bundle of joy? Does their proximity to the infant permit a "pass" to do this? Is it ok if they preface it with: "It's your decision but..." or "I support your decision but I'm curious..." or "I care & that's why I'm asking..." or "Have you & X-in-law discussed vaccinating?" Is there a socially acceptable way to do this? Is their legitimate interest in the infants health a valid reason to risk a potentially emotional, awkward or severely damaging result to their relationship?

SHOULD grandparents/aunts/uncles express their PREFERENCE for the arriving baby, their relative, to be vaxxed? What is an acceptable outcome?
STFU 🤫 & enjoy the kid. FULL STOP 🛑
They get ONE chance to INQUIRE & then STFU regardless of answer
They get a FEW chances to INQUIRE
They get 1TIME to calmly discuss their POV to PERSUADE & then STFU
They get a few chances to PERSUADE & then STFU
They get to AIR their POV as much as they want AS LONG AS they accept consequences.
Here's the tea ☕...
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
SHOULD grandparents/aunts/uncles express their PREFERENCE for the arriving baby, their relative, to be vaxxed? What is an acceptable outcome?
Post Opinion