Search Results: girls who want sex

WHICH ONE WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE AS YOUR SERIOUS, COMMITTED GIRLFRIEND?
The follow-up question to the one from two weeks ago. You get two women to choose from.

Option A is a girl you find out is named Alicia. She is flawlessly beautiful and has a nearly perfect body, like a fictional character rather than someone who's actually real. Easily can be considered a Nine, if not an outright Ten. She's 5'10"/178 cm, a college athlete, a "master at sex," and works hard to maintain her figure. However, she is very superficial and a perfectionist. She is very hard to please, conceited and only thinks of herself, and expects you to live up to her lofty, high standards at all times, or she will dump you and publicly embarrass you while doing it. Commit to her lifestyle, or you're gone.

Option B is a girl you find out is named Bodhika. She's not what you'd consider physically attractive, at all. Whatever your personal standards are, she's halfway towards the opposite of them. But she could maybe be "good enough" as far as looks go. She's 5'5"/165 cm, has small breasts, narrow hips, a small booty, and is slightly overweight. She is studying to be a doctor. She has noticed you around the neighborhood and really likes you. She's kind, sweet, affectionate, has a really good sense of humor, quite intelligent, nonjudgmental, and accepts you for all your flaws and quirks. You might even have some hobbies in common, as well. You'll likely just never find her to be physically attractive (unless she undergoes extensive cosmetic surgery, which she is unwilling to do).

Which girl do you pick? The 10/10 with high standards, or the 5/10 who accepts you as you are right now?

Inspired by @siseñor girl's question.

One of the reasons men get so angry over the friendzone is not because we lost our opportunity to be more than friends. Rejection burns but that is just a fact of life for more most men. Dating is like being a door to door salesman to us. Its up to us to make it happen and if we get a no then we want to move on ASAP until we eventually hear a yes. The disinterested girl is now just a liability if we continue to waste our time and energy on her.

Anyway the real reason we get angry about the friendzone is we feel like our masculinity isn’t being respected. Respecting a man surely doesn’t mean dating him, having sex and/or getting a relationship. Its understanding his gamble he took a (likely uncomfortably) by approaching you. It’s now your turn to be forthcoming about where you stand. It need to be done sooner than later.

Confidently assuming he is going to be okay with being platonic friends when it’s plain as day he wants more is disrespectful, cowardly and selfish.

While I can understand that women are nervous that men won’t take rejection well in reality most guys can take in in stride. If they do get angry or rude than take that as confirmation you made the right choice.

No the truth is most women don’t want to lose out on the benefits of having the interested guy in their orbit (attention, favors, ego boost, someone to use against you really like, etc.). They also know that interested guy will likely do more for them vs someone who isn’t. This is especially true of if they see the guy is “nice” which women either consciously or subconsciously find feminine. Most of them have no idea how deeply insulting that attitude to vast majority of hetero men.

Anyway I haven’t been “friéndzoned” in a very long time but I’ve had women attempt that crap (including grown ass women in their 30s). The attempt itself is infuriating tbh (a woman past 30 should know better. I feel there should come a point in a woman’s life where she should understand male psychology better.