Search Results: truly in love

Question:

When females ask for [“reciprocation”] from males, are they really asking for a “female-minded, lover?” 🤖 👧

^^(meaning they want a direct copy of themselves when it comes to loving, or something like a mirror, and that would make things unfair). 🪞

In reality, Males do not ask that females reciprocate their affections, by working hard for them or say, lifting them into the house when they have a stubbed/ broken toe/ ankle.

Is it true, women are right to want love, but they go too far expecting men to love, as they do? And if not, they would say “the men didn’t love them?”

• Maybe the real things in question here, is that men and women have [physical and EXPRESSIVE limits.] 🤲💪

• Maybe men cannot fully express their love for a woman, or maybe not express it to the same extent the women would for their men? 💅

Just as women cannot fully and physically tend to their men as men can tend to their women.💪

-Maybe that’s the point?

But there would be (the few) some men and women, who would abuse these realities and take certain males/females for granted:

• I. e. a male in a relationship who didn’t really love her, possibly pushing her in front of him as a robber robbed the store, 🥷 and

• a female who said how much she loved him (maybe even sang him to sleep), 🗣 but did the same for other men she was seeing.

This type of male and female would use their [strength and expression] to take advantage of their lover in the relationship. Instead of using it properly because they never truly loved that person in the relationship, to begin with. 🤷‍♀️

-Does this train of logic seem reasonable along with the top 🔝 question that is in bold font?

Is it just “one of those things” you know, when you’re in a relationship with the love of your life? 👀👐

(All images sourced from Google)

Do actors subconsciously mirror their character? (SOMETIMES)?

And if so, is it also morphed into OTHER previous characters, they’d resemble in their personal lives?

IF this occurs, is it based PURELY on the:

likability of their character?

OR

the habitual constancy of enacting their given character? Regardless of the character quirks: positive or negative

My logic here is:

these people are LITERALLY pretending to be someone with a bunch of other people they have never met until that time. A whole season would mean a few months of practicing aka redoing lines & takes

OVER & OVER again…

not only so (this said muscle memory)

but they’re seeing the faces of the new characters and instead of building friendships with those other actors in real time- they are essentially watching those characters (played by the actors) unfold before them as if it were a real engagement/ friendship/encounter.

So if the series is long & many seasons go by-

wouldn’t a single actor who’s learning another actor express (not themselves but the wishes & behaviors of the director), & pretending for so long…

Adopt the traits, assigned to that actor, and make it almost 2nd nature?

maybe not a whole belief/ moral

but the quirks/behavioral traits?

For example:

if their character is loud- they will become loud in their everyday lives.

if their character is loud but they are quiet in person, they may become more balanced between loud & quiet in their personal lives?

The range cannot be so well predicted-

the just HOW much they will be of their character/ just how loud they would be, for example.

& was Robert Downey Jr.’s Iron man, fitted for his persona? Or did RDJ truly adopt traits & the personal display of Iron Man?

Do actors typically choose roles/ characters that fit more with their own character traits/ beliefs?

Ideally, I’d love to hear what Morgan Freeman would say, BUT

I’m curious & would be extremely humbled/ grateful to read your liberated opinions.