Search Results: modern dating

It just seems like that's the way it is in modern dating thanks to dating apps and social media. Girls are flooded with matches and messages when they sign up for a dating app and it is pretty common for her to have over 100 matches in less than 24 hours after creating her profile. They also get a ton of DM's from guys via social media too. For a guy on the other hand, it is common for him to only get around 10-20 matches in less than 24 hours after signing up for a dating app and most of the girls that match with him either don't respond or their convo won't go far before it fizzles out. Guys have said it can take over a month just to get one first date from a dating app and most of the time there is no second date because the girls have such a big selection of guys they're talking to. Guys also never get DM's from girls on social media obviously and when they try to DM a girl, she's getting so many other messages from guys alongside his that he never gets a response. All of this considered, it seems like it has never been easier for a girl to meet a guy in the modern dating era, but it is harder than ever for a guy to meet a girl. Agree or disagree?

Married women are more likely to lean conservative. But does having children (married or not) impact a woman’s political beliefs?

I’ve had the displeasure of encountering a few childless middle aged cat ladies. 9 out 10 times they are far FAR left. What JD Vance said about them “wanting others to be miserable because their miserable” is very true. And if they had abortions earlier in their lives they often secretly regretting it.

Anyway I saw this comical post about never dating a single mother. It’s true there are a lot of pitfalls with that. But one thing is for certain: she choose to keep their child. I do respect that.

So just thinking for all the guys out there. Is it fair guys out women (over 30) in a damned if you do vs damned if you don’t scenario? Like a both sides are undesirable? I’m oddly beginning to believe single mothers might have a better head on their shoulders compared to single cat ladies over 30. The latter is usually extremely far left which is becoming increasingly insufferable.

NOTE: I no longer use the phrase “liberal” disparagingly. Instead I use the term “leftist”. They are not the same thing. A liberal is somebody who truly wants individual freedom. Think of a typical 1960s hippie (not a radical activist) when it comes the phrase “liberal”.

A leftist wants to use the power of the government to censor people and force redistribution. And there are a lot of “leftist” modern women today. They want communism.

Women don’t want to be a team with us, they want to be independent of us, not listen to us, do whatever they want and please. They don’t want to be wives.

Men……we have to be men, but women can be whatever they want. The biggest scam of the 21st century.

I think many women hate men without realising. They’re made to feel abused, controlled by us and try to compete with us.

This is what my cousin wrote on her Instagram. While I agree abortion should be allowed in rare cases of abuse against women - it is all about man hate.

In return I hope these mindless modern women never pass on their genes. I hope their man hate dies along with them.

First off, ITS lib-R-ary with an "R" NOT "LIBERRY"!

STATEMENT: Project 2025 and Libraries

EveryLibrary opposes the Project 2025 framework by the Heritage Foundation because it would dismantle important parts of how public libraries build communities, how schools support students and families, and how higher education supports the next generation of scholars.

It is essential to recognize libraries' role as neutral and inclusive spaces dedicated to providing readers with access to a wide range of information and books.

The Heritage Foundation has been calling for the closure of the Institute of Museums and Library Services (IMLS), the only source of federal funding for public libraries & state libraries. In Blueprints dating back to the mid-2010s, they say that Congress should have no role in ensuring that libraries are strong and available to everyone. We disagree, and so have Congresses with both Republican and Democratic majorities, which have repeatedly rejected their proposals.

Project 2025 would dismantle much of what makes K-12 public education the great leveler of American society. From proposals to eliminate the Department of Education and phase out Title I support for the poorest of schools to scaling back Civil Rights enforcement in the name of parents' rights. They advocate for increased censorship and threaten criminal penalties on educators. This will discourage school librarians from providing diverse materials, limiting students' access to comprehensive educational resources.

Across Higher Ed, Project 2025 proposes significant changes that align with a broader agenda aimed at reducing federal oversight and funding with substantial negative implications for academic institutions, students, and the quality of education. The broader cultural and educational policies proposed could undermine academic freedom, restricting access to research and materials that are essential for higher education and critical inquiry.