Search Results: proving him

Dad: "Your sister says she saw Mummy kissing Santa Claus, did you see that too?"

Son: "No, I was upstairs."

Dad: "Oh good, that proves it didn't happen."

Republicans don't seem to understand it.

First we had videos of people "only" illegally demonstrating in the Capitol "proving" the serious crimes we all saw happen in real time never happened.

Now there's a whole "report" pretending that witnesses saying they didn't witness something means it didn't happen.

Guess what? You didn't witness conversations in the White House either. It must be like a monastery of a silent order in there!

I have never gotten a second chance after a romantic screw up.

My screw ups were usually verbal. For example there was a girl I was having a fling with 2 years ago. She was cute af but her legs were a bit too briskly from not regularly shaving. I didn’t dare mention anything the first two times we hooked up. However before the third time I tried to tactfully ask her to smooth up a bit for our next hang out. She got pissed & that was the end of it. I tried apologizing a week later (despite her reaction being a bit over the top). She seemingly forgave me but we never met up again.

In my more serious and long term relationships I usually got axed for not communicating well enough over problems. Not saying women can be a unnecessary pain in ass at time. We all know that. But we have to hear them out whether we like it or not at times. However I had to learn a few hard lessons on that one. Still though I have never in my life had a girl follow up weeks or months later after she initially decided to cut it off saying she had second thoughts.

Anyway I personally believe women overall get more second chances than men for romantic screw ups. Especially in the western world. Even more especially if the man & woman are in “the same league”. Men are taught to endure more crap. Maybe sometimes it’s worth it to be patient but other times it’s pathetic (e. g. taking back a cheater). There are exceptions when women tolerate way more bs then they should if they are dating a guy way out of their league. Also some women sadly tolerate horrific abuse but stick around because they have some sort of sick twisted masochinistic pleasure from that bullshit (another topic). But overall they have less tolerance for screw ups as vice versa in my opinion

But in all the rom coms I (once in a blue moon) watched growing up there is a common storyline of the guy making a mistake but later getting a second chance and/or proving himself. But I rarely if ever see that happen in real life.

Just when the mass media could stoop any lower they managed to find a shovel and started digging again on this new monumental f*ck up: initially reporting that Israel bombed a hospital in Gaza which killed over 500 people.

This was later proven false by:

• US intelligence
• Radar proving Hamas misfired a rocket
• Intelligence recordings of Hamas militants admitting they misfired a missile
• Pictures showing the middle landed on a parking lot not a hospital. No way it claimed 500+ lives.

So why the f**k is mass media outlets like the NYT and Reuters taking Hamas’ word for face value and publishing headlines about it? Hamas is a proven terror organization that habitually lies to the citizens it oppresses and the outside world. How could the mass media use them as a “trusted” source. It’s beyond disgusting.

But their sickening malfeasance has real world consequences. This sparked outrage worldwide including riots which was all based on a lie. They have changed their headlines but have yet (or likely never will) own up to this atrocity.

It’s one thing if the media gets in wrong by conflicting sources. But trusting a terrorist organization is beyond negligent: it’s complicity.

When the media gets it this wrong they should held criminally accountable in my opinion.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/brian-stelter-tears-into-medias-atrocious-series-of-mistakes-covering-gaza-hospital-bombing-they-actually-did-harm/amp/