Search Results: women better than men

"I consider that it is better to be adventurous than cautious, because fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to beat and ill-use her; and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous rather than by those who go to work more coldly. She is, therefore, always, woman-like, a lover of young men, because they are less cautious, more violent, and with more audacity command her." MACHIAVELLI

If sex and dating was completely not an option/impossible among all those involved and everyone just treated each other platonically, do you think boys and men would get along better with girls and women? I use "males and females" because I'm talking about both boys and girls, among men and women.

I'm a teacher and although I notice boys and girls almost always sit apart from each other (usually, all the boys on the left of the class, and all the girls on the right side), they still generally get along with each other and don't have any animosity or issues that modern adult men and women have. I've taught in three different academies here in Korea over the course of two years, and this remains consistent throughout every class, unless it's all boys or all girls. Although I think some subconscious things keep the boys and girls separated, they still can peacefully co-exist with each other in a way that modern men and women don't seem to do.

In short, boys and girls under the age of 14 seem to get along MUCH better than adult men and women do.

So it's really fascinating. I think sex and post-puberty changes how males and females interact with each other, and causes the sexes to find even less in common with each other and harder to relate. I myself certainly don't understand why women behave the way they do (often, negatively).

But what do you think?

For example if I have to see a doctor and I don’t know who it is I’ll just assume it’s a woman and say “she” instead of “he” unless proven otherwise? I mean isn’t it better than assuming it’s a man and asking “what’s his name?” Wouldn’t it be more feminist to assume it’s a woman and ask “what’s her name?” Am I making sense or being way off? Please let me know thanks.

I’m having a girlfriend for the first time at 32, she’s 42. Due to the fact that she’s my first girlfriend I’m very immature and naive. I think like a 12 year old in terms of romance. I don't know if the good outweighs the bad. So in this question I’m gonna share with you the pro and cons.

Pros
1. Food: always cook for me on her days off. Even took the time to learn my favourite recipes.

2. Budgeting: She’s very smart with her money. We both have over 50k saved up with no debt. We have it planned to buy a house together and pay a low interest rate.

3. Open-minded: I can talker her about almost anything and she’s a good listener.

4. Very sharing: She let me borrow her car for 3 weeks when mine got totalled. Every time she gets bonus pay she’s willing to spend on me.

Cons

1. Has temper: Every time she has to explain something to me a second time she screams me. We end up fighting and not talking for days.

2. Conceited: She believes she so hot that every man in the world wants her. Her exact words “I have a big ass and D cup breasts. Every guy wants me”. Women should be confident but this is ridiculous.

3. Verbal/Emotional abuse: She tells me that I’ve never had a girlfriend because I’m socially awkward & weird. And how I’ll never find anyone better than her. And that the only reason she agreed to date me is because I’m handsome with muscles. And if I stop working out she’ll replace me.

4. Shallow: She refuses to date guys her age and only wants younger men. Nothing wrong with dating younger, but refusing to date your own age is dumb.

5. Male friends: She only has 4 female friends, the rest are guys. She even admitted a couple of them want her. She has a male bestie Alex who she texts almost every day. Whenever Alex has a girlfriend he barely texts her and she gets mad. She agreed not to hang out with guy after I told I’m uncomfortable, she said I’m “just being jealous”.

Is this how a relationship is supposed to be? please give me the best advice with your comments.

There's a story idea I had, where my character was a magical entity, who travels to a different city in North America every month, finding good, caring, wholesome, but unhappy people. 90-99% of the people in any given city are not good, wholesome, or caring, let alone all of those things but down on their luck or unhappy, so finding them is hard. Whoever I could strike up a conversation with, and discover that the pass the "good person" trials through conversation, my character would grant their one greatest wish, as long as it was limited to themselves or close family members or friends (no wishing for world peace or for dinosaurs to come back or anything).

The first guy, was small and sickly, like pre-serum Steve Rogers. He had sickle cell anemia or something. After discovering he was a truly good and humble man through conversation in a bar, my character initiated the final test and asked him for $20. He gave it to me, so the next day, he woke up with perfect health, as well as a body better-than-new. He was now fully healed and his mother no longer had to pay for his medical bills.

The second person, was a short pale blonde woman who was kind to others, but hated herself and her looks severely. She was more pragmatic and jaded in life than the first man, but she was still a good person; her self-hatred just kept her kind side a little supressed. After talking to her, my character asked her for $20, which she eventually gave a "what the hell" agreement to. The next day, she woke up 5'11" with 34DD's, a gorgeous clear-skinned face, and a perfect gym body, like a supermodel or Olympic athlete. She looked in the mirror and started crying with joy.

My character then continues the search for a new deserving person to grant another wish to. If the person is bad or undeserving, it can cause unforeseen chaos and trouble to the local world around them. So they have to be good, deserving people to mitigate any negative consequences to happen.