Search Results: What do you think

If we broke up 15 months ago. I buy an exotic car and put it as my WhatsApp profile photo. Do you think she will see it? I mean she hasn’t blocked me. I was with her for a few months, met her family that was it.
Would be nice to show her.

I hope this will hammer the truth into some hard heads.

46% of USA leans right and 45% leans left. Each thinks that the other side is brainwashed.

If the other side is mind controlled, then you must agree that 45% of the people are traumatized.

Then you ask what traumatized them? They lived the exact same kind of life as you lived.

And that's the point. You lived through the same shit. Which means you are also traumatized. Which means your politics are just cope to run away from your pain and label it normal.

The war was illegal and wrong and costing billions if not a Trillion. I think Democrats should make no deals until Iran war has ended. Then when the win in November and take power in Jan , they can just refuse to fund Trump's war.

Whenever we persuade someone to give us another chance, we are actually trying to traumatize them without knowing that we are trying to traumatize them.

Because in our traumatized subconscious mind, tolerating the intolerable is normal. We think we are even superior due to something about romantic "resilience". The methods do not matter of how exactly we win them back.

Again, we are not aware that we are just reenacting the trauma our parents taught us when they fought. We genuinely feel like the person is the most important and cutest.

But underneath, we have buried pain, our organism is still feeling threatened by our parents fighting. And because we were forbidden from calling them pathetic, we had no choice but to absorb it and pretend that it is normal.

And since we pretend that it is normal, we develop genuine attraction filled with hormones to reinflicting it onto others. That's right, we don't love the person, we just want to fill them up with this stress-response we have. No matter how much we crave them. And we justify it with "I'm just a clinger" just the same way as religious people justify anger issues with "I'm just beating sin out of you."

The intellect just makes up stories, including religious ones, to justify what the nervous system already did. And just the same way annoying LGBTQers are almost always a trauma response trying to reinflict itself onto others, that's why they have such a high need to display it publicly. The real repression that results in overexposure and worse is not "i had no other outlet" but the repression is "i wasn't allowed to admit that the dragon in wig was disgusting, so i suppressed the revulsion, and inside my subconscious it creates nervous system arousal when i traumatize others".

You never know that you are traumatizing someone. You can in rare cases, when you heal your own trauma later look back and see that you did. But during the moment you can only cope with self deception. Excuses are everywhere the heart isn't.

The wais 4 was published in 2008. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition. A newer 5th was published in 2024.

We hear about how einstein was a genius probably iq 170. But he did not take a test that was published in 2008.

The thing about wais' is it has a maximum possible score.

"In IQ testing, this often results in composite score ceilings, such as the Full Scale IQ capping near 160 on the WAIS-IV or Stanford–Binet 5." That means tbe maximum possible is near 160.

The "maximum standard Full Scale IQ ceiling score on the Stanford-Binet 5 (SB5) is 160" and "Standard Normative Ceiling: Capped at an IQ of 160". That is the cap.

all those so called geniuses with claims of more than 160- obviously took a different test not the wechsler!

If they took the Wais 4 do you think they would all get the highest score like a tie? Maybe they are geniuses and possibly would all get 160. or maybe we could accurately rank them?

I intentionally don't use the word "race" because I think it's a social construct. But our ancestry isn't. And sorry, white supremacists, your group doesn't have the highest IQs. Asians do. But does this mean anything to you?

Here is a reference to an academic study that analyzes IQ differences among children with different ancestries.

"The Collaborative Perinatal Project is a longitudinal study of over 53,000 children followed from birth to 7 years. Up to now, studies have analyzed data on the 17,000 European American children and the 19,000 African American children. Here data are reported and analyzed for a sub-sample of 100 Asian Americans. The Asian sub-sample averaged a higher IQ (110) at age 7 than did the white (102) or the black sub-samples (90)."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289697900040