Search Results: asking other people if i like her

https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/church-shooting-fire-michigan-09-29-25

Last Sunday, a 40 year old Michigan man named Thomas Jacob Sanford rammed his f*cking pick-truck in a Latter-Day Saints church in Grand Blanc, MI, got out, opened fire, killed four people and set the church on fire:

"In recent weeks, locals said, Sanford began behaving oddly – nearly running over a longtime friend with his truck in a seeming joke, asking a local political candidate questions about his positions on guns and then openly declaring his hatred for the LDS church, even saying that “Mormons are the Antichrist.”

According to people who knew him:

"[...] he “harbored unkind feelings toward certain groups” and “definitely talked about groups of people in ways that weren’t acceptable.”

"[...] you couldn’t miss [his] truck,” Allen said. Sometimes, he said, Sanford would “switch one of his [american] flags out for a ‘F*** Biden’ flag.”

"A Google Street View photo from June 2025 shows a “Trump Vance” campaign sign on his home’s fence, and a social media photo from 2019 showed Sanford wearing a Trump shirt."

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/28/us/thomas-sanford-michigan-shooting-suspect

He also was a veteran of the Marine Corps who was deployed during the Iraq War. He was an avid hunter and outdoorsman. Or, in other words, a typical libtard.

Unsurprinsingly, MAGA is still busy trying to milk every last drop they can from the assassination of Charlie K-K-Kirk. Sorry, I'm just stuttering here. Trump barely mentionned it and offered his usual "it's wrong but I don't really care and I can't exploit it".

So, will MAGA be declared a terrorist organization? Provided, of course, that you consider the fact that Antifa and the "left" in general has been declared public no. 1 following the murder of one conservative man by a white boy from a conservative family whose motives and allegiances are still unclear.

Will MAGA fill another stadium to mourn for these four victims of political violence?

The Department of Homeland Security is now barring states and volunteer groups that receive government funds from helping undocumented immigrants, according to a Washington Post analysis of updated guidelines and interviews with Federal Emergency Management Agency employees.

Some members of the national volunteer disaster group network also questioned whether the new requirements are constitutional and point out that they seem to violate some local and state laws that prevent asking about a person’s immigration status.

By accepting the federal grants and awards, the new documents state, volunteer organizations that help after disasters must agree to not “operate any program that benefits illegal immigrants or incentivizes illegal immigration.”

That could put groups that provide food, housing, mental health support and other assistance in disaster-stricken states in the position of having to verify aid recipients legal status before providing assistance, experts said.

They are also barred from “harboring, concealing, or shielding from detection illegal aliens;” have to agree to “provide access to detainees, such as when an immigration officer seeks to interview a person who might be a removable alien;” and not leak or publicize an enforcement operation.

Several members raised concerns that federal contracts cannot make nonprofits violate local laws that protect people’s privacy. The bulk of disaster-volunteer groups that work with the federal government are also faith-based organizations, which some groups said could create constitutional concerns.

"First, the federal government has never attempted to tell the nonprofit sector who we can and cannot serve. Further, as a faith-based organization we have the right to determine who we serve.”

WWJD?