Search Results: getting fingered

most people in usa support NAZl Ukraine bombing innocent people for more than 8 years because main media news in our grand USA didn't expose to us the many children who have been b0mbed by ukraine all these years.

They boast about democracy but didn't bother to tell us that they barged into ukraine under Obama regime to overthrow their democratically elected government and install a pro nazi one.

Can you imagine someone from another country coming to do just that to OUR country?

of which then after resulted in a civil war where we start getting bombed by our own government but only one side of the country, the other side supports it as the rest die and they claim on the news it's "terrorists" "separatists" but in reality its just regular working families who then have to try to survive that hell, but nobody believes the survivors, they have no power, the voice of the suffering are silenced by the power of the media because the ones who started this have an agenda to meet and your life is not part of that agenda.

Instead they feed a horrible twisted truth to the audience who watches in terror as they point the finger at others and say THEY DID IT!! Punish them

and so a grand majority of people support sending more b0mbs to those who did that to those people, thinking that what they are supporting is the GOOD, because how can the media lie to them right?

that's what happened in ukraine.

why are most people satisfied by what is told to them rather than try to investigate if what you're being told is true or not.

why most people are happy to support something they really don't know much about? even if it includes the death of people, even if it include the death of children.

Why? Google is a good example of that, you won't get around the bubble of lies if you try to find the truth through a search engine that supports the agenda in regards to ukraine.

It always starts as a verbal argument or insults are hurled and suddenly Person A makes the first contact. By logic Person B will tend to reply back too.

That very first contact can include either a slap, a punch, a shove, spitting in their face, getting into the person's face and poking your finger at them, etc. I'll give you a brief example:

Person B: Well I'm not stupid nor a c*** like your mother.

Person A: Say what did you just say

Person B: Is backing away but repeats it louder and clear

Person A: Shoves and hits first

Person B: Feels in the right to hit back and does it. Fight continues on and on.

Some people may think Person B deserved that hit but Person B still felt in the right to return it back too and can say ''Well I didn't hit first, Person A did''.

Regardless of how verbally antagonistic they might have been, isn't the person that makes the first physical contact always at fault?