Search Results: figuring out your sexuality

1. Do nature or nurture affect people most? It can be personality, looks, sexuality, mental illnesses etc.
A = Nature
B = Nurture
C = 50 - 50

2. Which theory is most positive?
A = That one saying nature affects mostly.
B = That one saying nurture affects you mostly.
C = That one saying it's 50/50.

Wants to hear your opinion. PS! Please explain Why. #NatureVsNurture #Discussion

My Opinion:
1) I think looks are ca. 80% nature and 20% environment, while personality/how you're as a person is 80% nurture and 20% nature. It's just my guess. I don't believe in Robert Plomin's theory about everything being determined by genetics and the parents not having much influence. I guess parents can affect their children's intelligence by the way they raise them. Even if they're adopted. People raised in a good healthy environment also tends to be nicer, politer, more intelligent, less criminal and function better than those one raised in horrible conditions.

2) I think it's most optimistic to think so. It's because of if you think people are born "bad", you won't give people a second chance to change as easily. If you believes most things are affected by the environment, the society can try to make a better environment so more people would improve themselves and their own behavior. Even psychopaths may behave better in a good environment than a bad one. If most things are genetics, we gets a "We gives people up" and "It's pointless to try to change them" mentality in addition to the society aren't encouraged to change to do more good for more people. I think nature talent do exist in some cases, but I likes to believe everyone are capable to learn something and be good at it if they tries hard enough.

The title is a clickbait. If you were a dictator, would you rather:

A = Be a dictator fighting for people's right, but the majority hates you for protecting minorities rights. They wants to kill you and the minorities. In this option you would go against the majority's opinions and be an undemocratic dictator not doing as the majority wants to.

B = Oppress innocent minorities, so the majority loves you and are happy with your regime. The majority would try to protect you and loves oppressing minorities. Oppressing may be segregation, persecution, getting rid of people etc. If you choose option B you would do what the majority wants to and be a more democratic dictator. Ca. 90% would be happy and only a few percentage in this "if-scenario" won't.

Minorities may be an ethnicity, a color, a sexuality, a religion, a political belief and similar. The majority is ca. 95+ %.

Please explain Why. This is a "defending minorities, but not care about democracy" Vs "oppressing minorities, but be somewhat democratic". #Dilemma #Dictator #Dictatorship

"Either you can break some human rights to defend some human rights, but risk the majority being unhappy with the undemocratic regime or you can break some human rights to keep some human rights, but majority being happy and the majority gets their will"
- Unknown

These 2 are actually my friends
Not close friends

the one with the choker is in middle school.
she's 12 I believe, maybe 13 now.

The other girl is a freshman in Highschool
She’s either 14 or 15.

The girl with the choker had a boyfriend less than a month ago, it’s obvious what happened, and now she claims she’s lesbian.

I haven’t asked the other girl about her sexuality but I believe she’s “bisexual”
They both posted this picture publicly

Few questions
not trying to be rude these questions are genuine

Are they really “Lesbian”?
is it a phase?
How would you feel if this was your daughter?
Do you think this is bad parenting?

Self-proclaimed Australian sexuality expert Deanne Carson asserted on ABC Melbourne that parents should have to get consent before changing their babies' diapers; claiming in an ABC News segment that families could set up “a culture of consent” in the home by asking newborns, "I'm going to change your nappy, is that OK?"

What do you think of Deanne Carson, of this notion that changing babies' diapers should constitute child molestation by default, and of the fact that this idea was entertained enough to be devoted a full segment in a global news broadcast, and considered to be perfectly legitimate by the news panel?

As I guy, I tend to see a woman's cleavage as both.