Social media censorship is destroying free speech and the free exchange of ideas!!! (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
31Opinion
When you start censoring thing, you're immediately in the wrong.
Stating hatred towards someone's sex or religion or gender isn't "free speech" it's hate speech, plain and simple. I will never normalize hate speech, people are just dumb they assume that the democratic party and the republican party is what you have to choose from and bicker over... NEWS FLASH! The majority of politicians are Zionist supporters and Zionism is a satanic political ideology.
@Bananaman177 : You hit this on the head. The Toronto guy is a typical Clueless Canadian. I've run into a small army of them throughout the years.
Explain, Clueless Toronto, how protecting Israel as a state unto its own constitutes Devil worship - while the nations surrounding it consisting of barbarians who mutilate vaginas and turn children into bombs is somehow "loving."
You speak of opposing "hate" speech, yet you come off sounding like an Amalekite.
@ObscuredBeyond Your talking to a guy with a political science degree, is in law school and knows about religion, I don't support Zionism, Wahabism and Western extremism like you buddy so shut the fuck up before I ask you where to meet up so I can kick your little punk ass and cry back to your mother, cool? Faggot ass cunt.
@Bananaman177 I dont have to agree with you.
@ObscuredBeyond blocked and muted, so talk your shit buddy i won't know u'd be talking to thin air like the weirdo and troll that you are, bye bye... i won't get your stupid ass notifications LMAO!
So many labels.
Yet it the only thing that tells them apart I guess
they all just sound the same.
This is true, however a lot of independents are setting up shop with their own platforms especially MGTOW. And so those sites that are censoring are about to lose their grip.
Good news but small potatoes compared to FB, Twitter, Yahoo, Google
Small potatoes true. But there's always that breaking point when enough is enough. Then they'll scatter to independent sites.
Translation: THEY'RE NOT LETTING ME SPEW MY HATE SPEECH!!! WWAAAHHHHHH!!! Nice to see Rissyanne saying her stupid spiel
Yeah she's pretty dumb.
Answer for your hate speech against the unborn, coward!
Exactly haha that’s what all this whining is about. These snowflakes are just mad because theyre not allowed to spew their hate speech with zero consequences anymore. Freedom of speech only applies to the government, not anything else, so if no one wants to hear you guys whine about immigrants or how conservatives are the real victims, they dont have to. Go make your own web sites if you're so butthurt about not being able to post your garbage online.
Beginning of a full take over. Nobody wants to be woken up to for this.
I totally agree, what an excellent take.
Thank you
No, we still have freedom but it does create Leftist Bubbles that exclude half of the public yet that they end up thinking conform to reality.
There are adult sites. People are trying to make the internet safe, not silent.
only the majority have free speech , the minority doesn't.
In this case, in America, the true majority are Conservatives but the world media is controlled by only 18 people and all are Globalists
GAG took a post off and it was not near as offensive as my other posts
said I mentioned a name when I didn't. I have mentioned names. If that is the case no one here should be allowed to mention Trump and insult him, but that is allowed. Again, if you are liberal there are no rules, if conservative you have rules.
This is the front line of the culture war.
Right on
Exactly. They think they can simultaneously force bakers to believe in and endorse one specific viewpoint and agenda; but forbid them from saying anything beneficial of the other. Yet, they also believe they can force you to adhere to their dogma; by pressuring companies into denying you service if you preach any other dogma.
So bakers have to endorse dick-in-ass, or be sued and jailed. But a "private" company (that's opened stocks to the public?) can provide a public platform, and you can be effectively jailed for having the "wrong" opinions when on it?
They think allowing a view that isn't theirs is being "oppressed" by that view - which somehow makes it okay for them to be the actual oppressors. The left is using Satan logic.
Nice take darling
Thank you
Good take..
Thank you
... No, it's a completely moronic take, and here's why: The terms "conservative," "liberal," "moderate," "centrist," "left-wing," "right-wing," and all related labels are erroneous and stupid and no one should use them. They tell you nothing about any given person's ability to use reason, logic, and factual evidence in order to reach appropriate conclusions about complex problems facing our nation and our world. You're (I assume) someone who votes Republican, regrettably, so it's interesting that you're bitching about this issue while simultaneously likely seeing yourself as a "free enterprise"-type guy, or whatever. Bud: These platforms are private companies. They are allowed to allow or NOT allow any type of content as they see fit. Their purpose is not to foment discussion-- it is to make a profit. And any content that doesn't help them in that goal is content they aren't interested in.
This is no different from a PNC bank banning Alex Jones from their bank lobby in some city somewhere if he like came in and started ranting about stupid bullshit at the top of his lungs, and they didn't want to deal with it. Private company; no thank you to his lying crap. If he wants a public discussion somewhere, then he can try to hold a rally in a public square somewhere or something, or attempt it at a private platform that WILL allow his stupidity.
@Thatsamazing, I couldn't disagree more.
Why is this even featured
I was wondering the same thing.
@Thatsamazing The old man didn't take his meds
Dunno how old he is, doesn't really matter either way-- he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
@Thatsamazing I remember when he said half of western Europe doesn't have tap water and Germany should be invaded again
*correct, split again
Germany should be split again? Ohhh, that's a new one. Interesting.
@Thatsamazing Too many idiots are being radicalized by alt right conservatism these days, it’s sad how it has infected users on this site as well
There is no free speech on Girls and Guys
True and example of what I am talking about…. but compare them in size to Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter maybe 1% in size who knows…
Very true as to what you say
Very true.
I with i could have collected my removed stuff, wait until i became an editor and then bombard it with a mytake "girlsaskguys sucks ass!"
@JudgmentDay
I wish i had collected my removed stuff*
@Unit1 Just ditch social media altogether. Or they should start and create their own kind of social media sites or whatever.
You can thank the feminist poisoned left for this.
Haha
The right incites violence, the left doesn't
I have had to break this up into 2... This is part one...
Why are you answering as “Anonymous”? If you have opinions and you believe you are correct then own them and be proud to stand on your convictions.
Anyway, you are most likely correct that some on the “Right” may have done some bad things too. But I don’t consider “White Nationalist” as part of the Conservative movement. These are Fascists and are more akin to the Communist/Democrats, as they were in Hitters time.
The term "Radical-Right" was applied today to people who seek to make fundamental (hence “radical”) changes within institutions and remove from political life persons and institutions that threatened their values or economic interests. They were called "right-wing" primarily because of their opposition to socialism, communism, Marxism, anarchism, social democracy, progressivism and liberalism and their “ultraconservative” or reactionary tendencies which limited new access to power and status. This is from Wikipedia. Per this definition I am a “Radical-Right”.
The term “Radical-Left” are groups that are seeking change through armed conflict or illegal protest in opposition to an established government.
There is only one listed for Radical-Right mentioned above. The list for the Left is too long for here. So please look at the web page:
en.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_left-wing_rebel_groups
This is part 2 ----
Now let’s look at some media overreach:
The Covington kids were minding their own business as shown in the full videos when an elderly native American cross half the mall to confront them. The 15-year-old boy was on vacation to D. C. and had just bought a MAGA hat. When the old man came up to him banging on the drum the boy just smiled. The news media then and now still reports them as the aggressors. This caused the school to be shut down for days as they received bomb treats and the kids parents received death threats.
In the boys testimony’s and the full footage of the event: While waiting there, the Black Israelites hurled obscenities at the Covington kids — calling them ”dusty ass crackers” and “a bunch of incest babies,” among other foul things. Instead of walking away, the Covington boys decided to respond with a round of group cheers — and, mystifyingly, the chaperones let them.
You can view the footage here:
www.vox.com/.../covington-catholic-maga-hat-native-american-nathan-phillips
This is just one example: There are many many more sowing grown men hitting children for wearing a MAGA hat. Or a group of men and women hitting a young girl and knocking her to the ground where they kick her for wearing a TRUMP tee-shirt. And others where a group of men beat up an old man for having the American Flag flying on his house. Just to name a few.
So why do you think there is more intolerance on the Right vs Left?
No, the left starts fights, gets their asses kicked, and then whines and cries about what poor innocent victims they are and how the big bad meanies just hurt them for no reason, and then they make a giant Hollywood movie about how they didn't really start the fight, and they didn't really lose it either, and they are so brave and heroic.
@Bananaman177 : Couldn't have said it better.