Circumcised guys if you had the chance to get your amputated limb restored to how nature intended would you?

[Anonymous]

Yes I would. So at least I could have a more satisfying sex life

No im used to my ED

Updates

+1 y

58% say yes.

Updates

+1 y

Like if your a guy who suffers from Jewish Di*k Syndrome?

[ObscuredBeyond]

Honestly, this is very small on my list of priorities. I'd first like to fix the right side of my face, which is full of scar tissue from the hidradenitis outbreaks I suffered when I was 16. And my left leg, which has a big nasty scar due to that lawn mower accident that also happened when I was 16. And my chest, which is also full of scar tissue from battling chronic hidradenitis for years and years. And get rid of that scar in the middle of my forehead from having chicken pox in 4th grade.

As well as a magic wand hand wave to erase all the psychological damage inflicted on me from Accutaine, from years of abusive authority figures, form years of dealing with treacherous false friends, from money troubles, from disillusionment with the system, from girlfriends who killed themselves by doing dumb things, frustrating jobs, police and federal harassment over complete nonsense I had no control over or say in (or sometimes, no involvement in whatsoever), increasing intolerance of barley gluten, and a slew of miscellaneous bizarre health problems that come and go like thunderstorms in a Michigan June.

It wasn't cheap, but I just stocked my fridge with a ton of healthy stuff. Tired of eating the garbage food I normally buy.

Yeah, compared to all that, missing a small amount of skin from my down under seems relatively insignificant. Aren't that many gals I'd trust enough to let use it anyway.

[Anonymous]

Circumcised male here and I'm super anti-circumcision. My children's genitalia will never be touched and I'll teach them to do the same to their children.

[26ukdude]

Good man!

[Kellykelkelltik]

Yep. This is a ridiculous practice. If a guy wants that, let him decide when he's older. Humans, we're a lot dumb sometimes.

[Anonymous]

I can't help but lol at all the females who commented for circumcision.
You do know its a pointless crock of shit right?
"It makes it look prettier"
So that makes it ok to torment if baby?
Google circumcision video and listen to those babies screams ans tell me if a prettier dick is worth that. If you still say yes you the most inhuman creaturw ever.

"Its healthier"
Really? Because countless studies have shown that in areas where hiv/aids etc is prevalent that those areas had high circumcision rates. While places with low hiv/aids rates had low circumcision rates. What black magic is this? Practicing abstinence or wearing a condom? Whhhhhaaaaaaa?

And a snooty remake to the poor circumcised men who think they actually please their partner. The only partner I've had that made m3 finally for thr first time ever orgasm... Was my uncircumcised partner.
The foreskin has a major role in sexual pleasure dispite what your being told.

And thats the whole reason it was cut off in the first place. Not for health. But because some old cereal tycoon [kellog] hated sex, and wanted noone else to enjoy it, so cut off the most sensitive part of the dick.

[Bookwik]

I believe all those circumcised guys would really like to thank you, you assured them that the damage done to their body out of their control will definitely prevent them properly loving their partner. How kind of you to point that out for them. "Mind of a robot and the heart of an insect"...

[Opinion Owner]

@Bookwik thanks pal.
Im here all day

[zagor]

Uh, circumcision was around many centuries before Kellogg.

[Opinion Owner]

@zagor for religious purposes

[ObscuredBeyond]

HIV / AIDS has nothing to do with circumcision. It has to do with local attitudes about promiscuity and homosexuality. The number 1 cause of massive HIV outbreaks, and this is not a PC answer, is bisexuals who are dishonest to their partners on either end. Period.

It's logical. HIV spreads most commonly in bodily fluids, like urine, blood, and fecal matter, and only sometimes in saliva. Piss-drinking, bloody sex/wrestling, and coprophagia are common among homosex perverts, not so much the general population. So they still disproportionately spread it amongst each other. Especially when they lie about their health to each other. The next orgasm matters more to them. Then, someone closet bi commits rape-by-fraud on a straight victim. Who, ignorant of their plight, beds another hapless straight victim. Five years later, HIV epidemic. That simple.

[Opinion Owner]

@ObscuredBeyond
yes but the reason people get circumcised is because they claim it prevents HIV.

[Setowl]

Is it really the most sensitive part :( ?

[zagor]

No, no one does circumcision for that reason. But it does lower HIV transmission a bit.

[Mishae]

Very interesting as the World Health Organization after years of study said that the best way to prevent HIV and many other viral sexually transmitted diseases is to circumcise males. Somehow there is a belief that sexual pleasure is severely modified by circumcision. Put that in the letter box of myths along with Blacks have bigger penises, profuse squirting is not urine, most girls love rectal sex,, the longer the penis the better the girl feels and so many others.
That is what I dislike about this website – it is obviously up for money which drives the Internet but none of the big shots here monitor the truth. They allow myths and bullshit to stay here. But dammit show your nipple and your pictures terrible. Cursing tell somebody this stupid that is thrown out. This website could be so much better if authority figures would monitor sponsors not look for nipples

[Asker]

Naturally the spread of HIV would be prevented by castration.

[Iron_Pounder91]

What you just said is absolute nonsense! The best way to prevent HIV is to wear a condom, period. It doesn't matter whether you are circumcised or not, having unprotected sex with someone infected with HIV is going to cause you to contract it, regardless. So the idea that circumcision prevents HIV has got to be the most ridiculous thing I have heard so far in 2016!

Circumcision is the most pointless, ineffective medical procedure in existence. I can't name a single health benefit from having it done because there isn't any (religious reasons aside). The exact same applies to female circumcision. If you are in favour of male circumcision, then you must be in favour of female circumcision, otherwise it becomes double standards and it would make you a hypocrite. Yes, it is true that female circumcision makes things cleaner down there by removing the labia & folds that allow smegma to build, in turn making it easier to clean, but that is not actually a health benefit. Same with guys...

[Mishae]

@Iron_Pounder91 healthland.time.com/.../

[Mishae]

I do not wish to continue this discussion. Medical journals abound. This is from Time magazine which is for the layman

healthland.time.com/.../

[LilWeezey]

If its the best way to prevent HIV then riddle me this...

The UK... Has one of the the lowest HIV infection rate...
The UK also the lowest rate of circumcision...
Meanwhile the US has one of the highest HIV
And also the highest rate of circumcision...

[zagor]

@LilWeezey Both are false weezey. You and the asker are making things up to annoy people.

[Mishae]

That's a pretty stupid comment. When talking about decreasing the spread of infection not decreasing the ability of a man procreate.

[LilWeezey]

What

[Mishae]

@LilWeezey to the girl who said castration is an answer. It was to her that I made my last comment. Castration is a stupid answer and I let her know

[ObscuredBeyond]

@Iron_Pounder91 : Condoms only cover a small surface area. If not HIV itself, the secondary carrier diseases still have a lot of areas that they can spread through. And condoms can break.

The best way to avoid spreading HIV is simple: don't indulge in a homosexual pattern of behavior, and don't have sex with a bisexual, or anyone else who has. Also, cross-reference health records with any other potential partners to make certain all partners have a clean bill of health. If they won't present it, don't reward it.

Condoms are false security. It's using your head, not some thin piece of latex, that keeps you out of STD trouble.

[Mishae]

@ObscuredBeyond since when do condoms cover a small surface area? More crap from the uninformed

[Mishae]

Cross-reference health records? What you take a survey before you fuck somebody in a bar? This is unbelievable unbelievable crap

[Mishae]

I guess you don't get laid a lot

[ObscuredBeyond]

Condoms shield only the genitals. If fluids leak onto someone's legs and absorb through skin, then the purpose of the condom in preventing diseases spreading is defeated. And while you may be able to avoid some diseases that travel through fluids this way, various other diseases just require sweat and skin contact. Legs rub against each other. Unless you have a full-body condom... yeah.

And going to a bar to find someone to take to bed is asking for trouble no matter what.

[Mishae]

@ObscuredBeyond tell me what disease spreads through fluid on the leg and cite the prevalence because that's just not true. A condom breaking and spreading down the leg and going through intact skin is just not happening. It would have to be an open wounds saw and a heckuva lot of bleeding. You are misleading the public

[Mishae]

@ObscuredBeyond people do not have sexual contact in the way you describe. Looking up someone's health records. For example

[Mishae]

@ObscuredBeyond where you think the majority of sexual interaction occurs from a church picnic?

[ObscuredBeyond]

So you would rather they risk it, just so you can feel better about your own sexual behavior, than take precautions? Also, I see you don't take issue with my statement about fishing for sex in bars. Guess you realize as do I that it is a no brainer that this is risky. For a lot more reasons than what STDs pose.

Also, have you ever heard of scabies? The Occupy scum got it through having sex in public. Condoms don't stop scabies. Also, that's to say nothing about contracting a normal communicable disease from someone during sex. Condoms don't stop the common cold. Nor intestinal flu. (Though a good way to avoid spreading that is to tell your relatives to avoid Taco Bell for several weeks if you come down with it.)

[TripleAce]

Most ridiculous justification I've heard in a long time. Lets pull out teeth to prevent cavities, lets rip put finger nails so dirt and germs don't get caught underneath. Hey bright idea here, lets remove womens clits because it promotes sex and promotes the spread of diseases and women getting pregnant.

In fact lets tie her fallopian tubes so i can prevent my daughter from having a teen birth but keep her eggs preserved so she can eventually still have kids..

Yea you sound that silly

[PippiL]

Hmm, if I didn't know any better, I'd think you were against circumcision.

[LilWeezey]

Everyone should be its pointless

[SuperOzgurX2]

@LilWeezey who cares if it's pointless? It's tradition in my culture so i got it done. Tattoos are technically pointless too. Should we ban them? No. Why? Because people can do what they want.

[LilWeezey]

Does the little baby that gets circumcised get to choose that he gets that done?
No the parents choose.

You need to be 18+ go get a tattoo because you need to be an adult to alter your body. Rarely can you get a tattoo under 18 even with parental consent.

If a grown man got to choose to cut himself or not sure.
But babies don't get to choose

[WhiteSteve]

Honestly, I'm good. If you have an issue with the practice, that's fine, don't circumcise any sons you may have. But they'll be fine either way. I've never encountered any sexual issues as a result of being cut. Sex still feels great, and the most pleasurable sensations still come from where my departed foreskin would have covered. If anything, it sounds like I'd probably have LESS stamina if I was uncut, what with all the extra nerve endings. Plus, the actually orgasm is more of an internal sensation, I don't feel it on the outside on my skin so much necessarily. That would feel the same whether I was cut or not. If nobody ever told me I was at some supposed disadvantage, I'd never know either way. I don't know, it's weird how it's usually uncircumcised dudes that are so adamant that is cut guys are some kind of victims. Over here in the cut camp, I don't think most of us are concerned, and we wouldn't know the difference either way. We used to have a guy here who was real sharp guy who always carpet bombed GAG with knowledge and wisdom, kheserthorpe. He was the one guy I've known of who was circumcised as an adult. He said himself that he prefers being cut. That's just one man's opinion, but I'm just saying that nobody else needs to cry for us, we're doing just fine and are wondering what you guys are so concerned about, haha. We certainly don't care about the uncut guys either way.

[Betwyn]

I miss Mr. K

[WhiteSteve]

@Betwyn Sorry, somehow missed your comment. Agreed, huge loss for GAG. If Confucious, the Dalai Lama, and Yoda all boned and went in on a baby (don't ask me how that would work scientifically, just roll with it😆), kheserthorpe would be the wise soul that they birthed.

[ObscuredBeyond]

Yoda wasn't that wise in the end. The new orange lady in Episode VII that I guess replaces his main function does a far better job imbuing wisdom with compassion, leading to Rey figuring things out way faster than she had any right to. Some might chalk that up to the script supervisor being lazy and not catching the discrepancies of internal logic. But still... Yoda is way overrated.

[WhiteSteve]

@ObscuredBeyond ahhh, gotcha. I'm WAY behind on Star Wars. Saw the first three when I was a kid, quite a few times, but probably not since the 90s. I haven't caught any of these new ones. Shame on me for throwing around references I'm out of touch with, I know Star Wars heads don't sleep and will call your shit out, haha.

[ObscuredBeyond]

If you haven't seen the prequels, you probably don't want to. As much of a jackass as Yoda was to Luke in 5 and 6, he was even more of one to Anakin in the prequels. And the mistakes they made depicting him and the rest of the council in the prequels essentially made the entire Jedi order look like complete idiots. Which is why the fanbase is so broken. With 7 outright ignoring 98% of what was in 1, 2, and 3; fans are now divided over how much in the prequels is still canon. Some say most of it still is. Others simply ignore the parts they don't like. See "Everything Wrong With Revenge of the Sith" on YouTube, and you'll get an idea for why the prequels get so much hate.

[ksoma]

Nothing was amputated. You pose a question while at the same time mocking one possible answer as inherently wrong, and despite the fact that circumcised men have been reaching sexual satisfaction, and breeding, for 6,000 years, you chose to imply that we all have ED and our dicks don't work at all and we're happy about it.

So, here's my suggestion to you: it is perfectly legitimate to be opposed to circumcision, but until you can make an argument against it that is open to even the smallest possibility of considering and respecting a dissenting opinion, even if you never agree with it, and make your argument in a way that is not designed to inherently place yourself on an intellectual highground, how about you fuck off?

btw? your update? out of date. 61% of men have no problem with our circumcised dicks. and the 39% who do? they have never had an adult dick that was not circumcised. They have nothing to compare it to.

[FakeName123]

I had a light phimosis. Docs wanted to circumcise me, my mom said "Hell no. What are the alternatives?" The simple alternatiev was me having to stretch the foreskin daily when bathing. That's it. Completely functional now and still grateful to my mom for making sure I don't get unnecessarily mutilated.

[Mesonfielde]

I'm not circumcised, and I'm happy with my perfectly natural wang.

[TadCurious]

Absolutely yes. I was circed when I was a newborn and I'd like to have an intact penis.

[Anonymous]

I don't think having or not having a foreskin makes much of a difference in terms of sexual pleasure. Having it keeps you more moist and stops your genitalia from drying up like a sad leaf. And not having it has some health benefits that might matter if we had no access to water, bathing, showering or alike.

I'd prefer having foreskin though. Seems more fun.

[mikemx55]

Yup, this sumes it up. MHO to this guy right here.

[johndugan11]

It all comes down to personal preference dude. Partners all want one that is clean and healthy so make sure you use one of those penis health cremes once a day. They provide vitamins, proteins and antioxidants to the penis and improves its overall health, hygiene etc. I use one and it works great. Check 'em out.

[johndugan1217]

The only way circumcision would be a problem is if the penis is unclean and unsightly.. this can lead to some comments and a loss of confidence. So make sure to use a penis health creme daily.. these are made just for guys and improve hygiene, skin texture and much more down there. I use one and it has changed the game.. things look awesome. Google them.

[Phoenix98]

Nope because honestly I'm fine with it, doesn't bother me, in fact I think it bothers other people more then it bothers the people that actually had it done.

[Asker]

Usually women whos men can satisfy the sexually because of circumcision are bothered.

[Phoenix98]

Actually there is no increase or decrease in a mans ability to please a women sexually regardless of whether he is circumcised or not, it's a myth that has been debunked quite a few times. If anything it decreases the man's pleasure because of the nerves removed during the circumcision. Also a lot of women don't really care either way and those of us that are circumcised don't particularly care either.

[Mishae]

When you get that information at age 18. That's totally wrong. Survey show that 60 to 70% of women prefer guys who are circumcised and there is no loss of sexual functional pleasure. It's nice to come up with things right out of your ass. And the moon landing was faked

[Phoenix98]

@Mishae Good to know either way I don't care *shrugs* it's not gonna matter to me regardless, and to the rest of us who are cut we don't give a shit nor are we concerned. Also more often then not polls and survey's especially those online don't mean anything in the broader scheme of things, of the entire population that 60%-70% was out of who knows how many people probably a couple thousand or so that took part in the survey, compared to the millions of people in the country. That doesn't mean much.

Also if you're going to reply to a person's opinion don't be an asshole, if you can't say what you're going to say respectfully keep your mouth shut and save everyone some time.

[RationalMale]

Circumcised, and don't really see the point.

1. most americans can have good hygiene, we are sane grown ups.
2. the bible only commands the israelites to do that, it is never even brought up to new testament christians if i recall correctly
3. don't sleep around with hiv girls, and you'll be fine.
4. if it's not broken, don't cut it off.

[Waffles731]

'amputated limb' Uh last I checked, I still have a dick, mines just different than 99 percent of people.
What do I care,
the foreskin doesn't really do anything,
If I had planned on having a kid, would I get them circumcised, No,
just because it costs money really, circucision doesn't really have any negatives or benefits,
Also I'll check again but I'm pretty sure I still have a dick

[Asker]

Yes you have part of a dick.

[LilWeezey]

No you have like 50% of your dick

[Waffles731]

@LilWeezey If we are going on percentages, it'd be more like nintey five,
All the foreskin is is basically a skin sheathe

[LilWeezey]

https://iampuck88.tumblr.com/image/136049571878
@Waffles731

[Waffles731]

@LilWeezey but the inner meat is all there and again the foreskin is basically a sheath and this conversation has gotten too pornographic for my tastes

[LilWeezey]

lol if your equating it to a sheath then its important. sheaths protect weapons
also thats hardly pornographic, its not a penis going into a vagina, thats pornographic.
this is an educational discussion, but clearly you have also been brainwashed by society and don't want to be educated

[Waffles731]

@LilWeezey Yeah there are a lot of education discussions that make me uncomfortable.
Learning something new can be uncomfortable sometimes,
For example, gender neutral is a very old Idea and one I really have no problem with and respect, but look at this picture
cdn.crimeagainstnature.org/.../...-Roosevelt-2.jpg

Remember how I said I I respect gender neutral as an idea and a practice,
thats still true but the fact is that boy in a dress,
Is the Four Term President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

I've not been brainwashed.
again, the foreskin is like five percent of the penis and talking about my parts with someone is a little incomfortable

[LilWeezey]

and whats wrong with a boy in a dress?
and thats why that issue will never get solved, because your brainwashed still into thinking talks of "sexual" body parts is something that is frowned upon and inappropriate.
issues will never be solved if its "uncomfortable"

[Waffles731]

@LilWeezey Nothing is wrong with a boy in a dress, seeing FDR in a dress is a little jarrin

[LilWeezey]

why he's just a man. cool he was president.
he's still just a man,

unless your related to him
but still he's just a man

[Waffles731]

@LilWeezey yeah I know that but then it brings to mind an image of fdr doing other things as president. rdering the development of the a-bomb in a dress, solving the depression in a dress, Announcing pearl Harbor in a dress.

[LilWeezey]

All but announcing pearl harbor sounds badass.

[VirginiaBeachBum]

I am SO glad my parents didn't mutilate me in such a way.

[Mishae]

Circumcision is not mutilation and using the word, "mutilation" is a ridiculous attempt to sensationalize a simple procedure that is done every day and requires a little bit of wine and very little bleeding. I say very little bleeding because properly done after 7 days platelet function is extremely hyperactive. Everybody has an opinion everybody says something nobody has the facts except doctors

[VirginiaBeachBum]

@Mishae When you take a perfectly normal body part and remove it for non-medical reasons, you have mutilated the body.

dictionary.reference.com/browse/mutilate?s=t

"1. to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts"

The penis is disfigured from its natural form by removing a part of it. End of story.

Yes, everyone has the right to their own opinions, but not their own facts.

[Macpherson]

Man it's hard to say. I've always wondered what I'm missing out on - the thousands of super sensitive nerve endings and the fact that it "moves with you" or whatever, but as someone who had no choice I also have to say I love the way I look, and it still feels pretty fucking good, and it hasn't let me down.

I've been told how beautiful it is by so many partners that I'm inclined to say I'm happy with it, but I have been curious about what I'm missing

[9mfeo]

Technically a penis isn't a limb. It's an appendage.

[Asker]

Find the right man and its a limb lol

[9mfeo]

No, child, no.

[Anonymous]

Thank goodness I'm not circumsized. When I have my head out, it gets dried out SO fast. I can imagine how much sensation the head loses when it's exposed 24/7 every day. Mother nature gave us and other mammals foreskins for a reason, stop trying to fuck with mother nature!!

[Nuqood]

There is such thing as foreskin restoration. Though it doesn't restore the nerve endings, it does restore the moisture which adds a bit more sensitivity (though, it takes around 3 years to achieve).

[Anonymous]

I doubt the 'stats on that map: circumcision is highly prevalent in Islam and in Africa.

this one will be closer to reality:

upload.wikimedia.org/.../...valence_by_Country.svg

[Asker]

I love the red yellow and orange coloring but fail yo see the relevance to the question.

[Opinion Owner]

It shows higher prevalence than mentioned in the question.
The poll questions are slanted too, linking implicitly circumcision to ED.

[Asker]

Agree to disagree jaquesvol

[PSGeek]

I am uncircumcised but I am very much against circumcising babies when it brings no health benefit. It is cruel and barbaric to mutilate a baby's body without him giving his consent. And anyway, how difficult is it to wash under your foreskin? That seems to be one of the main arguments in favour of circumsision - 'hygiene'. Well I'll tell you, it's not difficult at all.

[jss123]

The only people who can really comment are men who were circumcised as adults who had sex with and without a foreskin.
I was circumcised as a baby for religious reasons so I really don't know. Women told me mine looks better but that's very subjective.

[Millennium]

"How nature intended" ...
We ARE nature...

"a more satisfying sex life"
Who are you to say I'm not sexually satisfied with my circumcised penis?

[Mesonfielde]

No, nature didn't intend you to slice your foreskin off with a knife.

[Millennium]

@Mesonfielde Humans are a part of nature, pal. Nature intended to create humans. Humans intended to create circumcised penises. Therefore, there's nothing you or I could do about it.

[Mesonfielde]

By that logic, genital piercings are natural.

[Millennium]

@Mesonfielde Correct. They are! Good, you understand it!

[ThisDudeHere]

There is a difference between nature and natural. A circumsised penis is a part of human activity and thus indeed part of nature. But it is not natural.
Natural means original - as intended by nature, unaltered.

[Mesonfielde]

... we're just defining "natural" differently :P

[Asker]

Im sure your satisfied your sexual partners less so.

[Millennium]

I'm sure you're wrong.

[bryon]

If we were intended to put our prick in a guilitine we would have been born without it to begin with , all natural my ars

[Asker]

You don't sound certain lol

[zagor]

@Mesonfielde It didn't intend you to cut your hair or shave your beard either.

[Mesonfielde]

@zagor even so, that is my own choice and it grows back on its own.