Hey! Star Trek is cool!
Ya don't bring star trek into thos!
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
All you said is alpha fucks, beta b8cks.Also it is impossible to reach the minimum attractiveness wanted by females, given the consider 80% of men below average (and they want far better than average), and that attractiveness is based on height, frame and face. All of which are based on bone structure.
@incelposting 80% of men are "below average" because 80% of men don't take good care of themselves. I used to be like that. Attractiveness is based on height, namely you should be taller than the girl. Is all, you don't have to be 1.9m tall. If a girl is 1.6 she doesn't care much if you're 1.7 or 1.8. but it becomes a problem if she has to look down on youI have a slim frame. But I used to make it so much worse by having a bad posture. Again, noone requires you to have a frame of Dwayne Johnson, just have your upper torso somewhat wider than hips. If you don't that probably means you have posture problems. Try pulling your shoulders back and down and walking straight, also work out! I go working out at least 4 times weekly no matter what and I ve been doing that since I was 16Do you have a morphed face? No? Then congratulations, your bone structure is fine. You can have all kinds of faces, doesn't matter, there is a male model with a face like that who gets laid. But he spends big money on keeping that face clean of imperfections and young-looking. I just dropped 80USD on a skincare kit and I'm using it 3 times daily, how about you? Do you have acne or blemishes on your face? That Has nothing to do with your bone structure
@incelposting I have a wingman who is 21, 1.9m tall, Has long Black curly hair, Black dense stubble, square jaw etc, very good looking, but he's a virgin because he is fat, doesn't workout, could dress better, slouches and is a pussy in general. So no, it's not all about the bone structure
Females demand at least 6' tall. Also, nearly all of them want the top 1% of men. The rule used to be the top 20% of men but that has been revised recently
That does nothing to disprove the litany of evidence I have presented.
Its research based on hate. Simple as that.
Doesn't make it less true
Says the tradcuck nazi
At least I'm not a degenerate incel, who cannot get laid even if he paid for it.Being a NatSoc is good, being a vermin is not.
It s an absolute demonstration that females care about looks only.The fact this can be repeated easily with identical results, blackpill scientists have struck a breakthrough in analysing female behaviour.
No, it is not. Without proper measures to ensure consistency and transparency and proper representation of the women, the results are inconsequential
The results clearly show females love paedophiles and abusers
Someone can also ask some incels whether they would fuck a tortoise. If some of them say yes, then use that.That does not mean that incels in general want to fuck tortoises nor that the results are in any way usable
Results are replicable, consistent and accurate
Incels are some of the most brilliant, astute and capable minds of our generation.
Really? How many are research scientists or CEOs? What's your job?
As you can see many of them are blackpill research scientists
That's not real science, silly.
It clearly is
It's theories. It's not peer reviewed, it's not published in academic papers. Its confirmation bias for losers.
No, incel scientists are clearly not recognised due to their radical (and true) theories
You're just full of shit. Go clean your room, get a better diet, and lift some weights.