




Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 




There's no good way to keep the anarchists out of the crowd. As I commented in another post, all it takes is one malotov cocktail to turn a peaceful protest to anarchy. It only takes ONE person to plaster graffiti on buildings or statues. What you FAIL to understand is that the VAST majority of protesters are indeed peaceful, and simply want to exercise their Constitutional Right to peaceful assembly and protest.
The same statement as I made about about "it only takes one" is ALSO true about law enforcement. It only takes ONE officer to beat on or arrest a protester who was doing NOTHING, to start a riot.
Therein lie the problems. Lumping "all protesters" into the same category as the dude making pipe bombs is JUST AS WRONG as lumping "all police officers" into the bad seed category. And the former, is what you're doing.
Well you know it takes more than a gaggle of geese to create rioting. One or to will get arrested pretty fast. But when you got everyone tearing things up, like in the Portland videos I have seen, it's an entirely different story then just peaceful protests. Is some lame protestors, who maybe are there to protest peacefully, stay there instead of leaving like the police order them to, then they are just part of the problem and by refusing to break it up they are no longer peacefully protesting in my book.
Unless you see the whole story as it unfolds, it's difficult to judge. I disagree with your statement here: "some lame protesters, who maybe (maybe? - you think everyone is there to riot? ) are there to protest peacefully, stay there instead of leaving like the police order them to, then they are just part of the problem".
Those "lame protesters" don't leave because they believe they've done nothing wrong. They have a right to peacefully protest and NOT be broken up when they do. Once the destruction starts however, it's no longer a protest.
I'm sure the moms on their bikes, and the veterans, and the dads, don't come there to destroy stores and/or government property. They want to make a point, and they want it to be heard. Standing up for your Constitutional rights is far from lame. People have died for it.
They are nuts and Biden is retarded saying these are all peaceful protests. I know he is in a locked room somewhere to keep him from opening his big stupid mouth. What I wonder how they will do debates. Will they be by online means with someone telling Biden what to say? Then the retarded liberals and socialists will still vote for him.
Joe Biden is a sick pedophile. I watched a video the other day where He specifically states that having a 15 year old girl up against His body gets Him horny. The picture is out there and I always wondered why she looked creeped out and slinked away from His touch but after I heard the sound amplified it made sense.
@888thegreat Great reply.
I will watch it.
Thank You
Opinion
24Opinion
I'm not sure if you're actually looking for an answer or just wanting to rant, but I have a few thoughts regardless.
First of all, graffiti is not violence so while it's still a crime that's not the same thing.
Second, no one that I've heard is saying that those causing property damage shouldn't be arrested and charged, that's not the issue.
Third, the overwhelming majority of protests are peaceful, it's just those aren't the ones that make the news.
Fourth, even if all you claimed was true, that doesn't take away from the issues being protested. Sure you could argue it's causing more damage than good, but there are still cops getting barely a slap on the wrist for killing someone.
These protests are actually a good case study for how different media covered it in terms of how much focus was on violence and property damage, how much time was given to police spokesmen, how much time was given actual protesters and their leaders, and how much footage of different cities was used.
@Malcom_Reynolds Property damage is still an issue though not technically violence. Still, it cost money to remove, as well as repair damage to everything else they are destroying. That is NOT peaceful protesting. But barricading the police in their station and trying to set it on fire with them in it is attempted murder. So they are no better than the cops they are protesting about. Violence begets violence and neither will wind up the winner, only losers in the end. If your over 18 kid was running around your house spray painting your walls, setting the cat on fire, and breaking everything in sight are you going to sit and do nothing? You would probably grab him and kick his ass out of the house. So why should police sit by and watch all this and not try and do something to protect themselves and public property?
It's a front. Frame your violent attacks against the system you don't like as a "peaceful protest" and you can get away with a lot. The game changer is that media is complicit and wants to be because at the very least it generates income for them -- if they aren't genuinely interested in ideology. Social media has been positive and negative for them, because ass much as they try to stop filming (pretty weird if you're "peaceful") enough "unapproved" footage still makes it out there and shows what's happening, not to mention that with this level of connectivity and that size of a crowd it's hard to get away with shit like bringing an acetylene torch to cut through barricades.
But hey, they have to drop the "peaceful" image eventually, they need critical mass support. If they have enough support, people will look the other way when violence happens, and they'll frame it how they want, more people will support them, and then they'll escalate their violence. Rinse and repeat.
The irony is mind-blowing. The "alt-right" was always begging for an opportunity to over throw and dismantle a fascist regime that's run by a Tyrant, but it's the "libtards" and their mothers who are the ones that stand up against it, while the "alt-right gun loving, second amendment rights advocating, free speech protecting morons" are hiding in their shells and defending against the very rights they claimed to hold most dear to them. They say it's because the military police are fighting against the left that they remain hidden and they want to watch the left suffer, but you either believe in your rights or not. Rights are only rights if they are independent and universal, "that which is morally correct, just, or honorable." You don't get to chose when it is ok and when it is not ok to without becoming the very thing which you hate. No honor, no morality, no justice. Hypocrisy to the fullest extent. I am shocked, appalled, and disgusted by the American government, AND the American people. And so is most of the world.
People have a right to protest, but peacefully. These fucktards from the outside come in to incite the people and turn it into quite a different thing than a peaceful demonstration. The outside fucktards are the ones causing the damages, not the people who live and have to work there. So who are the losers here? Your city/county governments and the taxpayers while the fucktards go their merry way to the next peaceful demonstration.
I haven't said anything about my position on that, just on the situation as a whole. My question to you is at what point do you use your 2nd amendment right? And does it not matter that the government is arresting innocent people by unmarked military police, also that the police are breaking up peaceful protests? Again, I am not saying what is right and wrong I am only asking a question because I am curious, I don't have an opinion on this.
If the people are being picked up it is because they are in the zone that was ordered cleared by the police and they refused to go. What does a child do when he won't obey your orders? You take him to the corner. So picking these people up amounts to that. You don't obey then no roll in the hay for you.
I'm still trying to figure out how they are peaceful with all the damage they are doing and not obeying police directives to disperse?
Just watch the countless videos of peaceful protesters getting tear gassed and beaten with batons and shot with rubber bullets. also they asked peaceful protesters to disperse... that is a violation of your first amendment rights.
Or are you not going to watch any of the videos or peaceful protestors getting attacked and ignore it and come out with some bullshit answer again?
And unmarked military police picking up peaceful protesters too... that reminds me of my homeland during its dictatorship, it looks exactly the same and our leader said many of the same things trump says. Albeit Trump says it with the vocabulary of an eight year old. Your country looks so much like the dictatorship I came from it’s baffling to me.
Do you want me to send you some links to the Peaceful protestors being attacked? Or can you use google all on your own?
And please answer, at what point do you use your second amendment rights against the tyranny of a government? Just a general question I’m not talking about the protests now just when would it be appropriate? Under what circumstances would you say the people had the right to fight their military police as the right wingers love to use that defence for “keeping their guns”
Obviously you are blind. I have seen pictures of graffiti all over, damaged everything. Some may be peaceful but obviously some are not. When people are burning and looting I don't call that being peaceful. You can call it anything you want.
These aren't protestors. As you stared, they are bought and paid for anarchist minions. And notice their skin color? These are the same people involved with turning the term "Black Lives Matter" into a collectived Marxist organization. The term and the group aren't synonymous. Yet the idiots buy into it, diminishing what the actual peaceful protestors are trying to highlight. Then again, the term doesn't really fit the narrative or political end state. And that should make all law abiding citizens and peaceful protestors worried.
Because its bulshit the big one is coming we haven't seen anything yet watch what happens after the election. You know what I don't like trump never have never will. I didn't vote for him I'm a Democrat. Sorry was a Democrat I'm going to vote for trump. If trump loses we all lose the democrats are going to fuck us all up they want a new world order they sold us out they are behind covet19 they sold it to China look up Ed Mac black life's matter and Marc lessens pay attention it will blow you away
Well these guys are cowards. Everybody causing the violence is like hiding behind black people. Cause it's suppose to be about them and justice for them.
Yet to me it seems like they're worst off now than before the riots. There's been more black people being killed and black owned businesses were burned down during the riots.
BLM received tons of donations, but what are they doing with the money? You think any of the black community is going to see that money?
Psh yeah right.
They are useful idiots whom don't even realize they are being used to destroy a system in place where they have a chance at happiness for a system that they have no chance for happiness. I kind of wish We could have a trial run say 4 years of communism then when everyone begs it to end then either they whom wanted it would be sterilized and permanently hit with a stupidity tax or they give up their rights as American citizens and they get a free plane ticket to the shithole of their choice.
I don't know but I'm tired of this news. It get's me feeling like this
Looks like he is watching a Nascar car go by from his seat at the track.
These assholes have been rioting long before the feds came to town, and the only reason they are doing this is because the TV cameras are there to help glorify these morons. It has absolutely nothing to do race inequality.
I have no issue with peaceful protesters. The problem we are experiencing is that violent rioters and looters are using the protests as an excuse to do what they like and the Marxists are using the protests as a cover to create chaos.
Someone on Facebook posted a live video earlier from a protest in California. He kept panning the crowd they have to be 80% white people there. How are we fighting for black lives when it's all whites arguing? Not only that, if you march and hold signs your a protester. If you smash windows or burn or destroy property your a rioter.

Big money donations how fo you think the “movement” is so widespread and coordinated
Don’t look for logic where there is none, you are only going to give yourself a headache.
Too late, I have Excedrin Headache #3.
Most of the really violent types aren't even black 😂
Its angry white people who dont believe in God and hate their parents perpetuating this shit
I am with the police too
Because they are blaming the violence's uptick on the Fed's that Trump sent in to protect the Federal Buildings.
I hope this election will show the weak Democrat state leaders where the bear craps in the woods.
It's not about the police that is just cover. It's about a marxist revolution. Part of the way you have to do it destroyed the current society functions.
Police prevent crimes, keep the peace. They have to do all the can to remove that protection so it’s easier for them to remake America into what they want. It’s not cost effective for them to be stopped
You right on that. Martin Luther King Jr. Marched peacefully with his group and they had nothing on their person.
I’m seeing violence all round. Cops, federal agents and protesters.
Do you remember when they would claim the police were the threat. Yeah, these are the same people 😆
Pitiful and sad. Traitors everyone of them.
The answer is "Professional Assholes".
I prefer "assswipes" They clean up the assholes.
Same shit, different smell. Semantics.
Amateur Asswipes.
Cops are the ones initiating things.
it's a mystery even to me
Really disgusting isn’t it? Hope they rot in hell.
English please
What? Didn't I get enough expletives in there? I thought I did pretty well and could probably be a good comedian since they get their laughs with profanity.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions