Both are about the same in my opinion, but men's sexism is often publicised more, and society is more permissive of misandry (see "princess syndrome", "believe all women" etc.), so it appears as if men do it more.
That said, the "most sexist" men are probably more likely to escalate "casual" sexism into actual harassment compared to the "most sexist" women. Especially if those men occupy positions of power. I suspect it's like a pareto distribution, wherein 80% of the harassment and sexual coercion is carried out by 20% of the male harassers. The Weinsteins of the world have the means to "scale up" their campaigns of targeted harassment and abuse. Of course women in powerful positions can also be abusive or harassing to male subordinates, but I suspect there's less of those women than the powerful male harassers.
But in any case, that disparity is likely seen only in the extreme ends of the distribution curve of sexual harassers. The "average male sexist" and "average female sexist" likely share a level playing field, so to speak, and make up a similar % of their respective gender.
But in this case, how are quantity and quality different? If one gender "has more" sexist people then wouldn't the quality of sexism be the same for that gender?
Quality is a consideration of how deeply people believe, while Quantity is a tally of how many believe. Would you prefer a large number of followers who don't care beyond a basic level or a smaller group offering fanatical support?
I don't think anyone expects you to link an academic article on this ahahah Why do you think it is so, if I may ask? What do you think is the biggest driving force behind that?
We should do as the Nazis did. Label everyone so you know their race, gender, sexuality, ideology and religion. And those people should stay in their own circles and not allowed to discuss on matters that pertain to those certain groups
Women, because they act verbally sexist towards men, as if men are bad people. Women are bad people too, women get away with being evil all the time, and some women have the nerve to be sexist towards men.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
82Opinion
I'd say men but women can't be far behind. Probably just because of mega-feminists biting back hard. It's hard to say actually
Both are about the same in my opinion, but men's sexism is often publicised more, and society is more permissive of misandry (see "princess syndrome", "believe all women" etc.), so it appears as if men do it more.
That said, the "most sexist" men are probably more likely to escalate "casual" sexism into actual harassment compared to the "most sexist" women. Especially if those men occupy positions of power. I suspect it's like a pareto distribution, wherein 80% of the harassment and sexual coercion is carried out by 20% of the male harassers. The Weinsteins of the world have the means to "scale up" their campaigns of targeted harassment and abuse. Of course women in powerful positions can also be abusive or harassing to male subordinates, but I suspect there's less of those women than the powerful male harassers.
But in any case, that disparity is likely seen only in the extreme ends of the distribution curve of sexual harassers. The "average male sexist" and "average female sexist" likely share a level playing field, so to speak, and make up a similar % of their respective gender.
I voted A.
Strictly going from anecdotal experience, I come across more sexist behavior from men than women.
Wouldn't either answer be an example of sexist generalization?
No, because both genders don't have the exact same amount of sexist people.
That doesn't make sense, considering the question asks which gender IS more... not which gender HAS more...
Are you measuring quality or quantity?
Quantity. You're right, I should have said "has more".
But in this case, how are quantity and quality different? If one gender "has more" sexist people then wouldn't the quality of sexism be the same for that gender?
Quality is a consideration of how deeply people believe, while Quantity is a tally of how many believe. Would you prefer a large number of followers who don't care beyond a basic level or a smaller group offering fanatical support?
Personally, I'll always take a determined few over the weakness of many
This example kinda strays from the topic of sexism, but the concept remains
Who cares, both have positive and negative qualities.
I care because I asked the question and I agree.
Id say men but that’s just my personal experience
I don't think anyone expects you to link an academic article on this ahahah
Why do you think it is so, if I may ask? What do you think is the biggest driving force behind that?
Technically, only a man can be sexist. Just as only a White person can be racist.
It's the law of the land, so to speak.
No that's technically complete bullshit. Is that sarcasm? Are you dumb?
Does it matter in the end? A man has certain duties and roles just as a woman does.
God gave us our assignments all we have to do is execute.
About the same. I see both parties talking shit about each other and always about the same things/topics too.
There won't be a direct answer to this question as Gender is a strong candidate depending on what side of the fence you suffer
I find women sexier
Men
It's been statistically proven.
The fact that the majority of people, who experience sexual harassment is women, shows that men are more sexist
In the past the answer was men.
Today, women are clearly more sexist. But they are still so entrenched in their victimhood that they can't see it yet.
We should do as the Nazis did. Label everyone so you know their race, gender, sexuality, ideology and religion. And those people should stay in their own circles and not allowed to discuss on matters that pertain to those certain groups
Women, because they act verbally sexist towards men, as if men are bad people. Women are bad people too, women get away with being evil all the time, and some women have the nerve to be sexist towards men.
Women are wildly sexist and they don't even realize it.
I'd say women, they just get a societal pass when they say or do something sexist though
It isn't about the gender, it's about the people, but perhaps there are more girls who deny guys something just for being guys than viceversa.
I hate all this men vs women stuff but let's just say there's a reason Liam Neeson hasn't made a flim looking for his sex slaved son yet.
Men tend to be more down-to-earth, that's why men are more aware of sexual dimorphism.