Races are different, every race has it's attributes, how could people still think that some races are majorly superior to others?

[Anonymous]

Races aren't the same but they are equal, for example some races are obviously better at reproduction, could this be because they're inferior to other races on an individual level so they evolutionary compensate with reproduction to be equal to others overall?

[Gray-Wisp]

No person is equal to another person. No race is equal to another race. Now, it does depend on what you value. However, when you compare SOME people to SOME people one is obviously better. When you compare SOME races to SOME races one is obviously better. I determine better as wealthier, contributions towards humanity such as technological progress, and morality such as the ten commandments.

Compare Elon Musk to Bill Gates. Which is better?
Compare Elon Musk to Joseph Stalin. Which is better?

It's important to take time frame into account as well. Better could mean historically better or currently better. These could be subject to change. A race potentially could do historically awful but currently (like in the past 20 years) be on par with others. However, from current statistics history is still repeating itself.

[Asker]

The word better is vague, you can say superior and in what aspect.. Elon Musk compared to an average human like me, who's better? No one knows cuz the world hasn't ended yet and we don't know everything about every one, but he's definitely superior to me as he's more powerful, but is he better, you can't know that.
That applies to races too, you can't know if a race is better than the other, it's all about survival and I've not heard of a race going extent so far. But races are factually statistically superior to each other in different aspects.

[Gray-Wisp]

I defined better. Also, I would say Elon Musk as it is very likely that he contributed more to technology and is more wealthy. It would be foolish to pretend otherwise. If a normal person were to blink out of existence the impact to humanity would be practically nothing but if Elon Musk were gone we could lose out on some very nice technology.

They are statistically superior in *an aspect*. Let me ask a question though. Can you name a single majority black country that is not generally considered a shit hole? The only one I can think of is South Africa and that's because it was very recently transferred. It is currently worsening. I suspect that it will end up like Rhodesia.

[Asker]

To this point we don't know for a fact if Elon's contribution to Technology is good or bad, we don't know if the world is better with or without him, what we know for a fact is that he's powerful and effective, we don't know if his influence is positive or negative. Saying who's better than who is far beyond of knowledge.

[Gray-Wisp]

I can't think of an invention 2,000 years ago that I was against, or 1,000 ago, or 100, or 10. I wouldn't even un-invent nuclear weapons if I could. Unless Elon Musk ends up directly wiping out humanity it's basically impossible for his technology to be negative. I guess it's possible that Elon Musk ends up wiping out humanity. However, everything points to it being the opposite, such as his push for being on multiple planets in case one of them has an accident.

(Or I guess if he colonizes Mars and then opens a portal to hell with some new energy device.)

[Astarlessnightsky]

Races are all adapted to different habitats, for example dolphins are really good at swimming and bats are the best at sleeping upside down. Canine are good at smelling their prey and working in groups to tracking it down and humans are the absolute best at handling tools.

[Dinosaursandanime65]

Because some can send a wave of radiation that makes living organisms glow light blue for a few seconds. It’s really effective against Dicerosaurs. I kinda doubt humans would be able to find them without a digital threat or something like that.