
Why is every first world country white?


I'd look at counter examples to consider... The questions I pose are food for thought & you don't need to actually answer them.
The concept of 3rd world went away with the end of the Cold War, I believe. People realized that simply dividing the world into 2 camps didn't give a lot of detail so we have the Human Development Index (HDI) that allows you to see stuff like where one country ranks compared to any other country. "The HDI is a summary composite measure of a country's average achievements in three basic aspects of human development: health, knowledge and standard of living." The higher the HDI the more developed/advanced.
1. The nation of Georgia is the ancestral homeland of Caucasians, basically. It has a lower HDI than the African nation of Seychelles which is 90% black. Seychelles also has a higher HDI than Mexico.
2. Russia is NOT a 1st world nation yet is mostly white. Why is that?
3. According to your own map Japan is a 1st world nation. But it's not white.
4. Your map has an error. It claims that South Korea isn't 1st world... but South Korea is definitely on the official list of 1st word industrialized nations.
See https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/hdi-by-country
I agree with all your points except that they lack detail. Russia and Georgia are caucasian but they're also Slavic, not Germanic. It's like comparing Koreans (richest Asians) to Cambodians (poorest Asians). Theyre not the same ethnicities.
But, but but.. you are splitting hairs that aren't in your original question. I also don't think that the U. S. caucasian population is mostly "germanic". I just checked. It's 17% by my understanding of the term although maybe you mean something else. Far as " It's like comparing Koreans (richest Asians) to Cambodians (poorest Asians). The richest man in Cambodia is worth 1.5 billion dollars. One of the many things he owns is 45% of a major bank. He could probably find enough cash in an old pair of his jeans to buy everything in your neighborhood. So I kind of doubt that when you look at a country's rating that you're really looking at a measure of what the ethnicity in that country is capable of. The other thing I left out is that smart people around the world tend to migrate to 1st world countries. Like I knew a guy from Africa who migrated to the U. S. and he graduated from a top aeronautical school. He's a pilot, and an engineer who designs aerospace stuff. He's not doing it in Africa. I guess 1st world countries are magnets that suck top talent out of other places. Not all of the talent but a lot. Places like India & China have such massive populations that even after a lot of talent gets sucked out they still have enough left to do stuff like develop nuclear bombs, submarines, interplanetary space probes, nuclear power plants and so on.
True and I know most white americans aren't like me. I'm highly germanic (95%)
They aren't. America isn't even white.
Thanks for MHO!
According to that South Korea and China are third world 😂 I know some in China live in poverty, but there's no way with China's GDP it could be third world.
Other countries in that red map aren't third world either
The taxes in china are crazy, and they're paid every month
Yeah, I get it but with it being one of the most powerful countries there's no reason for it to be considered third world and lesser than Ukraine (which is a terrible economy) there are more opportunities in the bigger cities too, many foreigners go study there
So what I mean is even if it's true (which I don't know i'd have to check) some of them still live comfortably
Yeah the largest military and one of the most industrious nations ever. But is it built to last? I don't think so. Let's give it some time before we say they're one of us (whens the last time Britain and America had a war with each other). China seems like they know they're unsustainable, so they've determined they'll just start wars while they're at the top of their game and whip everyone into submission
Who decides what is first, second and third world?
Africa was first. Europe and Asia were second. America and Australia were third.
What is the criteria to be a "first world country" and who gets to decide which is which? That will probably answer your question.
Because of recent history where we progressed and took over faster wasn't always like that
Maybe we just had better access to divine intelligence
Opinion
50Opinion
WHAT? South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore are third world? HOW? No way is Kazakhstan more advanced than those. No way are Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Mauritius and Greenland third world. Even Iran and those North African and Arab states are at most second world. Though that term was used to apply to Communist countries and isn't even accurate anymore.
Although this map is inaccurate, I understand the point you're trying to make. But it's hard to make this argument without someone calling you a racist. And really it's White and East Asian countries. Personally, I think it comes down to culture and work ethic. White and Asian people have different priorities. They care about security, quality of life and economic growth. While other races just want to sit around wait for handouts. White and Asian leaders also in general seem to be less racist and less corrupt, and care about their country as a whole, while other races have corrupt leaders who only care to benefit THEIR race or tribe/ethnicity. But the first thing I mentioned too. Because it's no accident that even in places like Brazil and Colombia, the safest and richest places are the ones that have majority White populations. Even in the Caribbean, the colonial islands are far better off than the soveirgn islands.
One Latina said on here before, that Whites think they need to have a good job and education to be respected, while other races think they need to have a tough reputation on the street to survive and be respected.
Care to explain why Denmark is green but the Greenland territory is red? Or how China and Russia aren't at least on the same tier? Or how Turkey is "third world" but Kazakhstan is allegedly more developed? I would take your source with a pretty heavy grain of salt.
South Korea and Japan aren't white...
But to answer your question, Environmental Determinism. Or, white people lived in the best habitats on the planet, so had a headstart when it came to civilization building, and later on, conquering. (The Egyptians and Mayans are rare exceptions, and China has just always had horrible leadership.)
Because that classification only has relevance to Cold War politics. The First World was US and its allies and the Second World was the USSR and its allies. Of course a country that has strong European, in particular English, roots, is going to be allied with the European countries.
First, you have to understand what a first world country is. A first world country is one who fought with the allies against the axis during World War 2. Non-white people were treated as inferior at the time and white countries would not work with them. Prior to world war 2 (and continuing to this day), non-white countries were/are frequently pillaged and raped by white countries, leaving them underdeveloped and rife with problems that were caused by outside interference from white colonizers, which typically left behind death and suffering in their wake everywhere they went.
1. You have to believe in the batshit theory of race.
2. I think many non-"White" folks would dispute this supposed First World status. Especially since China is on the verge of becoming the world's biggest economy and the leader in science and technology. They just mastered quantum teleportation.
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan would all fall in with the first world. Singapore is close but they lack the diplomatic alliances. They often try to stay neutral because they are very small and poorly positioned geographically to take a stand with the first world against China. Hong Kong use to be on track to be first world, until they folded to mainland and now they are a shit show...
I don't believe in "First World" and "Third World" countries. We're all on the same planet, this is just another way of showing that some countries are "superior" and others "inferior". Which is stupid and it's not true at all.
Anyways, I guess that happens because of colonialism. Europeans were responsible for it and they had time to steal other countries to develop theirs. And most Europeans are white.
No one should call my country third world.
Nigeria is the New York of Africa. The London of UK.
Nothing third world about it.
I'd say so. Texas gets a bad rep as hicks and cowboys but Dallas is one of the richest cities in the us
Maybe l. a?
The first (which is not a ''ranking'') world is set up of ''Western'' style countries. These have a mostly white-ish population.
You could as well ask why all bicycles have TWO tyres.
I have often met people with a mindset that ''first'' is better than ''second'' is better than ''third''.
Which is silly. We are not in a football tournament.
We could as well call it A-world, B-world etc.
Because those countries decided which ones will be the first world
Whats the definition they used
You're right. The second world countries are those that werent explicitly anti communist
Russia and Eastern Europe could be considered white and they are considered second world nations. There is also a large part of South America that could be considered white since they are Portuguese and Spanish descent. Many of these countries in Central and South America have very corrupt governments so that is definitely a factor.
White but the shitty kind of white. Russias economy is currently smaller than italy. Hahaha
Yep. I’m surprised it’s not included in the third world category.
There are many parts of the US I wouldn't consider 'first world'. Also why do you consider some Mediterannean people 'white' but not others? You including Sicilians under 'white'? What about southern Spain? This is a very American question lol
You forgot China they had a civilization while we were still swing in trees so why are you not saying they were Yellow Race they conquered half the known world White were next and you bitching about them. But you forgot the first conquers the seat of all civilization on this planet Africa they litterally conquered the world but they were black brown non white so your argument is moot Every color has had their turn at the top of the heap since time started and before
Id rather be a white barbarian than a African dude with a stick shoved up his dickhole
Noted your opinion!
I just thought something related to it. beside stuff in industry revolution. I got information that UK did not others else beside opium so they forced China to open to balance trade. even know that made Chinese be unable to work and Chinese use silver to trade they took it directl. even though they know that don't benefit each others. and westerners would kill Asian when satisfied their goal until they found that need them again. so kept them so they felt not human at that time.
first/second/third world have no real meaning, it's just cold war era labelling
China is third world, but it's basically first world in terms of development and economy. So not all first world countries are white.
They're very corrupt and most chinese students would love to come to a first world country to study
And rich chinese people buy property in california etc
You think your own country isn't corrupt? At least China is brazen about their censorship and agenda. If you give people the illusion of choice they will never question who gave them the choice.
I think America is moreso corrupt due to Hollywood than it is due to the government judges, senate, etc
Cope
there are a few governors and senators who obviously have their own free will. I think the corrupt people in the government have just weaseled their way into it, but our system wasn't set up to guarantee their place like the PRC
Cope, politicians, just like most things in a free market, can be bought.
Alright. Im done justifying my self to you.😂
The dragon will rise and the amerifats will realise how badly the fucked up
That is a good question. The one I always wonder about is why do all these places with good climate and nice beaches usually have shit for an economy except for tourism and the local usually live in poverty.
Yeah but they'd make good retirement areas. Your money is worth more when everyones poorer, sad but true
Ironically that holds true for swathes of the UK too ( apart from climate, that's always shit). A lot of the prettier parts would be screwed without tourists and the locals if not careful can end up in poverty.
First come, first served.
I'm Dutch, we got rich because of trade, including slave trade. We got a golden age because of it and still profit from the boost it gave us. Our biggest export is managers, knowledge, something we only gathered because we had a good life and had time to advance forward.
That's the only reason we're a first world country, we took the opportunity 100s of years ago and we still profit from it.
The USA owes its prosperity to Western Europe, Japan and SK to the USA and allies after WW2. The middle east would still be sand and camel fvckers if we didn't need their oil. I’d say the seed corn of global standard of living increases came from western Europe and the industrial revolution
There are also Asian first world countries. It is because White and Asian people accomplished over 99% of human achievements and all the rest accomplished nearly nothing for thousands of years.
Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and, South Korea aren't. Neither is the UAE
take a wild guess?
but don't forget china nor India.
and I bet few people even know where "3rd world" originated.
so if there's a first world and a third world... who's the second world?
Greece, Romania, etc
We all know
Much like the left/right political spectrum, where I wonder how many people know where that originated from, the 1st/2nd/3rd world classification is essentially outdated.
It has nothing to do with how well off a country is. It merely pointed to the alliances of the Cold War, First world being US and its allies, Second world being USSR and its allies, and Third world was unaffiliated countries, which tended to be too poor to have any stake in the matter.
@BrosephBrostar
did u just make that up?
once upon a time...
there was the OLD WORLD... which was Europe.
then there was the NEW WORLD which was the western hemisphere.
everything else was thrown into the third world.
THAT's the origin.
everything thereafter was made up by people that didn't know what they were talking about... and ignorant people have made new terms and phrases.
You're talking about something completely different homie. I didn't make it up, that's the origin of the name.
lmgtfy.app/
@BrosephBrostar then they've updated the origin... because "old world" and "new world" and "third world " are 2 centuries old.
what u posted is what they are now, fair enough.
i'll stop here.
have a good night.
Alright, cheers.
You don't consider Japan and South Korea 1st world at this point?
A lot of those Middle Eastern countries are EXTREMELY wealthy. They have oil for one thing.
Dubai, UAE is the richest, yet it's built by workers paid less than minimum wage.
Because they colonised the originally richest parts of the world and established power and took their money
You do realise that in order to colonise a place you first need to conquer it - which in this case means having to have technological advantages?
Because white supremacists colored that map (it is completely wrong).
How do you know it's wrong
A lot of immigrants say even NYC seems like a third world country nowadays. we dont have the character and spirit anymore that made us great. It doesn't have to do with race. Or does it? The ancient English were democratic and believed in individual liberty afterall
Individual liberty has nothing to do with democracy. Nor does it's absence. Democracy is simply a system in which civilized people can remain civilized by agreeing to disagree, trusting that reason will win out, instead of abusing or eliminating each other until they get what they want. Individual liberty is simply what our democracy currently agrees to. Hopefully it won't change but if masses of people figure out a way to make it unreasonable, it will need to be revisited.
Because the industrial revolution happened in England and it spread throughout countries that were similar and close in proximity.
Europe invaded/subjugated basically everywhere, which kinda puts a dampener on development
Doesn't matter. You can't make up a double standard based on how recently it happened.
And how exactly was developed dampened? All of the former colonies became independent. If they were unable to make advancements in their society its entirely their fault.
Hell, Europe was anihilated by 2 world wars and still managed to recover. No other continent got destroyed that much. And somehow its still not a genocidal shithole
first, because they named themselves that... and also, because of colonialism
The question is false. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore are first-world countries and that may include Hong Kong.
Japan and South Korea is coloured as a first world.
European countries has a history of colonization, whenever any other country try to progress the Europeans honestly said ain't going to happen.
Not every. Japan, singapore, taiwan, etc, are first world countries.
History classes explain it. It starts with the iron age and industrialization in Europe followed by colonization
I live in a 3rd world country and I’m a first world. I have peace here and No copy’s bothering me with pity bull shits
Europeans developed the fasted technologically over the last 500 years and exported that to the rest of the world. Most of the first world is a former British colony.
"RACISM"!!
There, I beat you liberals to the punch.
I only know
Invading other
US Petrodollar deal with OPEC countries
Japan because of plaza accord G5 country's help japan grow
Because that is the skin color of the people who live there. Europe in particular is always white.
There’s no such things those are just labels countries are countries
Maybe for the moment but what had been will be again. And who defined first world anyway.
Because they rated the resources and killed off the native populations in those countries. They also used slavery on a mass scale
Its almost like some races / cultures produce better socieites that everyone wants to join...
Interesting.
whit people have lighter skin and are solar powered. It's easier for more money
Good one.
Not true. I see you hiding over there, Japan.
Truth is because of the scrabble for africa you know what happened
China, ? Japan?
China literary has the USA by the balls. Your own military report to China first.
Cuz of industrialization and greed.
What do you mean by white?
you're the only one
Apparently you haven't traveled much... What does white have to do with poor or undeveloped. Argentinian is not undeveloped nor poor just bankrupt due to the President taking advantage and stealing as much money as possible just as the priority and the prior president..
But you said white. Argentinians, Uruguayans, Chileans are just as White as North Americans..
You should word yourself correctly..
Maybe if you would travel a little bit you wouldn't say ignorant things like that..
Argentina was migrated by Europeans and a lot of Germans after the war including Adolf Hitler which many people believe died in Germany because it makes them feel better and feel closure.
But sorry, He died of old age in Bariloche Argentina as well as many other German refugies from the war.. There's actual documentation.
Because we defined first world.
This map is wrong.
Doesn’t Africa have a few first world
Technology
Who invented our technology? I heard it couldve been ancient aliens
Colonialism
Did you go to Berkeley? That’s a straight up Left wing view. Spoon fed to young college kids. It goes much deeper than that like having the Magna Carta or Declaration of Independence hundreds of years ago… not so fucked up feudal state that stifles the people and innovation. But, but, bad white people… but racism… yeah, like we needed their two rocks and thatch huts, the cotton gin just would have been created earlier without them.
Maybe it isn't the whole story. But it certainly had something to do with it.
I don’t know
Its green
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions