Do you think you'd benefit PERSONALLY from a New World Order. (globalism, one world government)?

[Anonymous]

[libsaretards]

HELL NO! Having ONE entity controlling everything would erode many people's freedom and opens the door to tyranny. Also, with one entity ruling the world, technological advances would come to a stand still. The varied ways of human thinking have led to amazing tech. If that variety fades due to things only being allowed to be done a certain way, you risk technological stagnation. Finally, people have different ideas for how life should be lived and having a one-world order would mean suppression for ANYONE who disagrees with them. Yes, it is going to happen someday. The Bible mentions this and the consequences of such a government.

[Levin]

It's here and I don't see how we're benefiting.

All of our liberties have been thrown into the rubbish bin.

[Asker]

I don't see why anyone would want that.

[Levin]

I'm feeling that lass.

[purplepoppy]

It's always been an ambition since childhood to be the leader of such an organisation. But to answer the question I doubt my life would change much no matter who's in charge.

[dustybiker]

Starting from scratch doesn’t necessarily guarantee a better situation.

[crmoore]

There are pros and cons to everything so it's very likely that everyone would seem some benefit in one way or another, especially considering the scale of a one-world-government. But I think what you're trying to get at is if I view the concept favorably. And the answer is "I don't know, but I err on the side of 'no'".

[BeMuse]

Have you even read Die natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung durch Freiland und Freigeld by Silvio Gesell? It would be horrible for people.

[BeMuse]

It's not like people are going to back down though...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXTycZUUHEk

[najekim]

Ain't gonna happen unless something threatens all life on Earth. Then it'll go back the way it was beforehand.

[Asker]

Best answer yet.

[Anonymous]

As a non-westerner i say fuck no we all know westerners will try to destroy other cultures and paint theirs as the superior one. They will probably colonize our cultures too the same way they’ve colonized lands. We don’t need that. The world already decides in global meetings about matters which concern us all such as global warming other than that we draw the thick lines and borders.

[horsenrhinounicorn]

If you have one government, you lose the ability to move between countries and live where it best fits the culture and needs for you and your family.

[Snakeyes7]

Absolutely not. That would let the government be as oppressive as they want because there would no longer be a country to flee to. You're stuck with them.

[BillyBalls]

Fuck that.

Any group of people living in a specific geographical area have the right to self rule.

[MCheetah]

No. I don't respond well to Communism or most authority figures. I'd be a freedom fighter living off of rats.

[exitseven]

No. The world is going down in a hurricane and America is the only lifeboat. Like most lifeboats it only has so many seats and so many liters of water.

[OlderAndWiser]

HELL FUCKING NO!

[Asker]

This is a very complicated subject and most people who think this is a good thing, can't articulate why.
I think they view this as a situation where you don't have a care in the world, and the world government takes care of you from cradle to grave. I don't even pretend to understand all of is, but I remember when Trump airlifted 100 million dollars in food and other humanitarian aid to the starving people in Venezuela, the planes weren't allowed to land on their soil. Nicolas Maduro would much rather his people eat out of garbage dumpsters, than to accept help from another country.

So what if at the end of the day, the guy sitting on the throne was a whack job like that?

[OlderAndWiser]

What is good for the people of Venezuela is not necessarily good for the people of Namibia. As government power becomes more centralized, it tends to become less responsive to the needs of the people being governed.

[Asker]

No government should let their people starve. In Venezuela they were eating their pets. I don't think Biden would welcome Venezuelan or Cuban refugees, because they sure wouldn't vote for him.

[OlderAndWiser]

Exactly. Potential voting patterns is what drives the left's immigration policy.

[Anonymous]

No. But I don't have that same crippling paranoid fear of it that so many Americans seem to have.

[Asker]

LMAO

[TheBigGuy9]

Only bout.01% will benefit. It’s why you’re called useful idiots. Then they will dump you when they get what they want.

[disgustingweebtrash]

Everyone will individually benefit, but as a collective they will be slaves

[Asker]

Tell me in what ways you will benefit?

[disgustingweebtrash]

You will own nothing and be happy

[Asker]

I'm guessing you're being sarcastic.

[disgustingweebtrash]

I mean that literally, you will own nothing and be happy. Not all people will be happy with it, only the complacent

[Asker]

Are YOU complacent?

[disgustingweebtrash]

Does it matter? There's way more complacent than non-complacent, the result is known.

[Asker]

Read the title and see which word is in all caps, and then you'll know if it matters to me.

"Do you think you'd benefit PERSONALLY from a New World Order. (globalism, one world government)?"

[Rangers]

Absolutely not and I'll fight until my last breathe to stop that from happening

[WowwGirl]

My family is in politics so maybe

[Asker]

How would it benefit you?

[WowwGirl]

I'd be up there in ranks

[WowwGirl]

Not at all at the bottom

[Asker]

What I'm about to say has nothing to do with you or your family.

I was talking to a guy on another site, and he said that when a dictator takes over, the first thing they do is line up all the "useful idiots" and shoot them.

Seriously, what possible use would Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris or AOC be to the new world order? They are VERY useful now, because they're being used to help usher in the change. But once the transformation is complete, they've outlived their usefulness.



This is a good example. The shadow government needs a war-like situation. They don't want a real war, but they need to citizens to believe it happened, for some type of political gain. Dustin Hoffman is a movie producer that creates the fake war that is broadcast on cable news channels. It worked perfectly, and it won over the hearts and minds of the public. (very much like 911 happened. Everyone wanted to go to war over that)

But when it was over, did the movie producer win a spot at the top of the heap, or did he get a bullet in the head? I won't spoil the ending.

[WowwGirl]

Okay

[Asker]

I don't know what's going to happen, but only one person will be sitting in the throne.

[Anonymous]

Global tyranny without and other country to step in and save you?

Hitler wanted a one world government. So did the Russians

[BarefootJB]

Absolutely not.

[shortster]

Nope.

[Pterodon]

Nope.

[noohair]

Absolutely not.

[jimmy2]

Not at all