If you had to chose, would you rather end the war in Ukraine, or feed everyone in the world for one day? Explain why?

[HormoneGuy]

[MCheetah]

Feed everyone in the world for one day. I don't think Ukraine needs my help. Not to mention, this question didn't imply "ending the war" would mean Ukraine would win. It could involve nukes or something.

[HormoneGuy]

I meant non nuclear end, or to phrase it in better words, a long term cease fire.

[Dargil]

End the war in Ukraine. That will move us away from the risk of Nuclear war.
Feeding everyone for one day accomplishes nothing.

[Imkass]

End the war, also I don’t think it’s always about food people need proper shelter Before they can cook a real meal

[aided_]

SORRY I KEEP TRYING TO WRITE EXPLANATIONS BUT NO MATTER HOW I WORD IT FEELS WRONG
LETS JUST END THE WAR

[Blackcupcake]

food alone won't save people's lives so I would say end the war to save lives

[SmokinAces2000]

I would end the war because feeding everyone in the world for just one day won’t solve world hunger

[HormoneGuy]

But it would give people a chance to live.
All over the world, many people are starving, some dying due to the starvation. Giving them food for one day would give them hope to continue on.

[SmokinAces2000]

It still wouldn’t change or solve anything in the long run