Why does the left seem to promote terrorism for achieving its political aims? Was the SC leak done intentionally to try and alter the result?

WhiteBoyChill
So word has broken out and this was done purposefully. The justices themselves said it was not intended to be made public.

I think its obvious to anyone who’s been paying attention that this was all done to try and intimidate the justices, to get them to alter their eventual ruling, considering that people have already been showing up at their houses and threatening them with retaliation.

Anyway, I hope the justices don’t fold under the pressure they’ve faced but it just might work unfortunately.

The left seems to believe in mob rule instead of the rule of law.

Either way I still remember their selective moral outrage about January 6th yet they had absolutely no problem with BLM rioters burning down entire cities for months over the summer.

And here they are again refusing to condemn threats of intimidation against our established government.

Whereas I can still recall plenty of Republicans who condemned the Jan 6th events. But of course for liberals, political violence is perfectly acceptable if it helps them achieve their aims.

Anyways they’ve been referring to all of these people as “peaceful protesters” and so far have not condemned ANY of them and told them to calm the f*ck down.
Why does the left seem to promote terrorism for achieving its political aims? Was the SC leak done intentionally to try and alter the result?
12 Opinion