Why are people misunderstanding why we have guns in the United States?

[Stoner710]

The reason why we have guns in United States is to protect ourselves from foreign and domestic intruders and tyrants. Domestic intruders usually involve rapists thieves and people who want to do us harm. China and Russia are not likely going to invade the United States unless they have a death wish.

The point of the second amendment is because we don’t trust government government can easily turn tyrannical this is why the founders would have honestly never set up a government if they didn’t believe that men needed government to survive banana tyrannical one the point of guns is to kill the government

[Anonymous]

True, but let us clarify a bit. Lets focus on the word Tyrants.
If you look at the documents containing the laws that allow the right to bare arms you will see why we have them.
The Declaration of Independence stats part of that reason. The introductory sentence states the Declaration’s main purpose, to explain the colonists’ right to revolution.

"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers FROM the CONSENT of the GOVERNED, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes DESTRUCTIVE of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to ABOLISH it, and to institute new Government"

And I highly recommend reading the rest of it. It references the shirking the yoke of the oppressive British government. So this right to bare arms and abolish governments is clearly not exclusive to "Hunting" as some want you to think. OR home protection. But certainly can include that.

The first 1 amendment of the Constitution has been trampled these past 2 years. Freedom of speech, Freedom of Press, and the right to bare grievance against the government, as well as protest. The second amendment is now on the chopping block.

What do you think will happen if they arbitrarily ignore the second amendment and try to enforce removing of this right. I grantee you it will not be peaceful. This country will split into a civil war and a revolt.

I do not have arms, do not want to have arms. But it is clear that this law is granted exclusive protection and specifically forbids the government to interfere with possession of arms. So if the government tries to do this, just as the DoI states they have the right to revolt. I certainly hope this does not happen.

[qwert1234]

You talk like you are the only country with a threat.
Middle east has radicals.
Africa has radicals, gangs, warlords.
South America has cartels.
South East Asia has.. China and Radicals.
Europe has.. Russia and some immigrant issues.
Australia... has... well, everything wants you dead on Australia..

Your military fights overseas to make sure the war is as far away from you.
Your CIA funds people to throw down governments.
You have the most sophisticated technology on the planet. (You and China perhaps, but same point).

Don't tell me you need guns for protection. No one is constantly ready to pull their guns out. If your firearm is in a safe, then it's not for protection, ain't it? Unless the perpetrator is willing to wait while you open the safe.

You need them because you like them. No other BS reason.

[Stoner710]

Ok and how are we to defend our selfs? Say a rapist entered my home and attacked my wife and I to let her be raped? I’m not a except in hand to hand combat am I suppose to fight and intrude who might be bigger then me! Might have a knife or he might have a gun himself because criminals don’t care about they law he wouldn’t have broken into my house and tried to rape my wife in the first place. Are we all suppose to be like Apache or Comanche knife fighters maybe defend ourselves with a tomahawk. Course that wouldn’t have any effect if he had an illegal firearm then I would be shot trying to defend my wife and she now not only gets raped she also has a dead husband as well

Guns are 100% from self defense now only from invaders like if Russia attacked the United States but home intruders and yes the federal government If ever comes down to that. Biden comes out and says you need F15s and MOAB bombs misses and rocket that they would use against the American citizen if we ever tried taking down the government just makes the case from private citizens to have F15s and MOAB to be in the hands of private citizens not to take away guns form private citizens

[qwert1234]

Ok
How fucked up is your first world "leader" country to think "rapists" are coming to your specific house and rape your wife? How special are you in the society? How many enemies do you have to think that one day, people will break to your specific house and murder you?

I live in a third world country. We have communist rebels, we have wannabe-Isis, we have other muslim extremists, we have politicians who are warlords, we have cartel-wannabes... Heck, we have street gangs.
We also have traffic, which slows any emergency response team.

And to add icing to the cake, at least 40% of the police are corrupt.

We don't arm civilians with guns.
THERE IS NO MASS SHOOTING HERE. There are crime, sure.
Sometimes, there are people who gets kidnapped and have their heads chopped off.

But no one thinks that "a rapist" would come into my house and ohh, how the f should I defend myself.
News flash - most thieves only want your money or your phone - worse, your TV.

You got competent police force - especially in terms of technology. You got competent military (sans discipline but hey). Use them.

And yes, you can defend yourselves with knives, bats, other blunt objects - IF THOSE INTRUDERS CAN'T BUY GUNS TOO, can't you?
Oh and before you say getting the guns from black market - think. Black market prices are waaaaaay too expensive for those lowly persons. Black market does not make it accessible to even common persons. And those who can afford it, probably aren't the rapists that specifically target your house.

Jesus, I swear only you guys think "how can I defend myself" constantly. Other countries don't have this mentality - even the ones with actual terrorists on them...
And you pride yourselves being leaders and superpower and first world.
What's the matter with you.

[Anonymous]

The US military is the most powerful in history, no one can challenge it. China, Russia and Britain aren't going to be put off by a bunch of rednecks with AR15s nor is the US government.
If a foreign military invaded or the federal government got tyrannical there's less you "well regulated milita" types could do just like there was nothing the taliban or iraqi insurgency could really do against the US military.

[cth96190]

Your view is both foolish and contrary to history.
The Vietnamese kicked US arse with little more than a militia, although, to be fair, the US military was not allowed to fight to win.
As one who one held a commission in the Australian Army, I can attest to the effectiveness of the Taliban et al. Again, to be fair, the USA and its allies were not allowed to fight to win.
I would remind you of the words of Admiral Yamomoto, who said that an invasion of the USA could not succeed, because”…there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”
During that time, even Democrats were patriots who understood and supported the Second Ammendment.

[Stoner710]

@cth96190 true you also gotta factor in the Vietnamese people were use to being invaded throughout there history, from the Chinese Japanese and French invasions they knew how to stop more powerful armies because they had Dealt with foreign invasion for literally centuries dating back to 111BC

We also gained our Independence by defeating the most powerful nation on earth at the time. The 2nd amendment was designed to stop the federal government from repeating what the British did to there colonies.

Also the idea of a well regulate militia was so that people would get together and practice and after they practice the men would take there guns home with them. There were also many cannons in the hands of private citizens most of the civil war’s cannons where owned by private citizens.

We also did stop the Taliban unfortunately we elected A president that handed the country back to dictatorial regime because the war in Afghanistan was unpopular we were down to 2500 troops and those 2500 troops were protecting the Afghan people from the Taliban Taliban really wasn’t a problem until Joe Biden decided to hand the country over to them

[Opinion Owner]

@cth96190 the US military was not kicked out of Vietnam nor did they invade it. They just weren't prepared to stay for 50 years to secure it. Overall it was a strategic victory where trillions of Russian & Chinese resources were committed to victory in South Vietnam, resources that were not used elsewhere to spread communism. Also at the time there was discussions in the US about the need for US military bases in Japan, Australia, the Philippines and so on as well as in these host countries with the war in Vietnam that talk was silenced.
The Taliban largely retreated out of Afghanistan for nearly 20 years, every so often they came back to test the water and their capabilities. The taliban are decent soldiers with a lot of them being sent for military service in foreign Muslim countries like Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt and even receiving military training from the US military when the joined the Afghanistan national army but they were never going to be able to fight in open battle or any kind of a fire fight once the usaf drone see you it's game over.
As for admiral yamato I think he was talking about the US government's potential ability at the time to mobilise, arm and train armies based on how over 20 years b4 the US entered ww2 in ww1 the US quickly armed and trained 4 million soldiers in the space of a year or more. In China the Japanese encountered a rifle behind every blade of grass as did the Germans in Russia but it didn't matter to a well trained military force.
The notion of a citizens with AR15s being able to be anything more than target practice to the likes of drones, apaches, tanks, artillery is a complete fantasy espicially if that enemy doesn't care about civilian casualties, collateral damage and bad media PR.

[Opinion Owner]

@Stoner710 the war in Vietnam wasn't about independence it was a proxy war to unite all of Vietnam under the banner of communism, the south didn't want to be communist. The French held Vietnam for some time but after ww2 they were too weak to do so, the Vietnamese were well trained and armed by this stage having fought the Japanese. America was refusing to support French colonialism, the Chinese and Soviets were supporting the Vietnamese and the French people no longer supported this colonialism. After Vietnam was divided between the communists in the North and democracy in the south. The US tried to support this democracy in the south but they turn out to be right wing fascists that undermined us efforts in holding south Vietnam. When the US left the vietcong were largely broken, ARVN forces were left well armed but they were too dependent on the US military and the corruption ate away at the county, when the oil crisis happened funding for ARVN was cut and the NVA launched a full scale attack on ARVN. Something similar happened in Afghanistan.
Technically the French defeated the British during America's war of independence.
"the idea of a well regulate militia was so that people would get together and practice" that's called the national guard, reserves. A standard m4/16 would be better than the mikitia bring whatever they want, I don't think people should be allowed to take howitzer home, I mean in colonial times it made sense.
As for Afghanistan, nato spent 20 years there trying to build up the Afghan national army to fight off the taliban, built schools, wells, roads, hospitals you name it but ultimately the will was never there and they seem to want America out and the taliban in. Muslims have a thing about non-Muslim armies in Muslim countries. Compare how easily the taliban took back Afghanistan to how hard the Ukrainians are fighting Russia. Big difference.

[CandiceK]

Because they get their news from The View. Jesse Waters sent a guy out into the streets to ask people where they get their news. It was painful to watch. Many said TikTok and Instagram.

[Stoner710]

Please send me a link I’m more into Omi Horowitz

[CandiceK]

A link to what?

[Stoner710]

The link of Jesse waters sending guys out on the streets to interview people it would be fun to watch

[CandiceK]

I watched it on Fox News during the Jesse waters show. I'll see if there's something on YouTube and get back with you.

[Stoner710]

Thank you

[Anonymous]

Liberal logic goes as follows:

Police = Bad
Gun = Bad

Police with guns = Good (because there the only people they want to have guns)

They don't believe in self defense. They only believe you have a right to die in your home by an intruder or at some business where a mass shooter will kill you. Because why would someone who wants to commit murder turn in there gun? Right now we have politicians actually flirting with the idea of having police come to your house when ever they want to check up on you to see if you have guns.

[WhiteSteve]

Look, man, I’m not calling for your guns or anything like that. I’m just saying that, at least in terms of tyrannical government…. you the guns aren’t going to help you, right? They have missiles and rockets and drones and tanks and artillery up the wazoo. Even if every American rallied with a gun, they’d make ridiculously quick work of everyone. I just feel like we really lose sight of that fact, that all the guns in the world can’t save you against modern warfare capabilities.

[WhiteSteve]

*you know the guns aren’t going to help you

[jshm2]

Don't be silly. The constitution was written by qwill and candlelight. It was always meant to be updated. But successive governments have been too partisan to do it effectively.

The ideas of guns was that the people should be their own police and militia. But with the advent of a military, independent police and DoJ that made it pointless. But it is only the profiteering gun lobby that kept it in place.

[Agagagagaga]

Don’t be silly. When a woman wakes up with a rapist in her room she can reach for her phone or her gun to protect herself. Your silly ass wants to make sure she gets raped.

[CandiceK]

@Agagagagaga
Don't even indulge that UK freak.

[Sargentcaptain]

Oh a Brit who doesn't understand the American constitution, what a surprise.

[cth96190]

Because the vast majority of those on the left are ignorant of history and lack the intelligence to see and understand the obvious.
The Communist puppeteers who pull the strings of their useful idiots (how Lenin described the bulk of his followers) in the Democratic Party and elsewhere want the population to be disarmed, to reduce their capacity to resist the Communist Hell on Earth that is the wet dream of Marxists.

[Juxtapose]

People really underestimate what gorilla forces are capable of. It wouldn't take a very high percentage of the American population to overwhelm the USA military and besides, the USA military is explicitly forbidden from acting against citizens on USA soil.

[WindAtMyBack]

Because liberals love to misdirect the issues and change it into something else.

Another common issue they do this with is taxes. They always make it about taxes, when it's really about oversized government.

[RolandCuthbert]

Because no other country in the developed world has mass shootings on this scale. Or as much death from gun violence as we have.

How are you still this dull?

[Stoner710]

Other devolved countries aren’t as large as the United States either with a country of 332 million people your going to have some evil people in the country we are the 3rd largest country in terms of population and the 2 above us are largely authoritarian. Plus when you actually do your research mass shootings are just as common in European countries as the United States when you account for population

[RolandCuthbert]

It has always amazed me that a troll on the net claiming to be apart of the "Master Race", can't get basic statistics right, makes statements that are easily proven false and does it with absolutely no shame at all.

Then entire European Peninsula has twice the population of the United States and yet. . .
less than 1/10th the murders.

I didn't even make it specific to gun crimes dude. Just plain murders. . . period.

Our murder rate is starting to approach Russia or Ukraine. . . and dude. . . that is saying something. . .

[Avicenna]

They understand quite well, but don't care and want leftist tyranny.

[DarkWinterNights]

Because they don’t think that a tyrannical government that oppresses or slaughters its citizens could happen to the Western world even though we’ve been laying the groundwork since the end of WWII.

[Stoner710]

Unfortunately this is when the left is wrong government is highly involved in human death and corruption look at China and the USSR

[purplepoppy]

It must be awful to live your life in constant fear of tyrants popping up and taking over.

[Stoner710]

Not really, it’s what makes America great, also given the fact that the government was the number one cause of death in the 20th century it makes sense for us to be skeptical of our own government.

[TwoToTooTutu2]

They either live in a privileged euro country, or they're literally afraid of guns and get uncomfortable in their presence. Generally they're privileged and sheltered from the grim reality of the world we live in

[noohair]

Humans by their nature are selfish. When they get power in the government, they want it to last forever. The one thing the Founders did wrong was to not make the First Amendment the firearms amendment.

[Sevenpointfive]

i understand that. plus, some people rely on hunting for food

[Adronicus]

Because cowards are like cattle. Spook one & you spook them all + there's an agenda. Control enough minds & you control the world.

[888theGreat]

Liberals live in a make believe world where everything is ran by batteries and no one is evil and no one wants to be a criminal.

[Intothevoid666]

Also we have far more violent crime than the rest of the developed world which is why gun rights make sense here:

[OddBeMe]

So…you’d like the government to protect you, but you also need to fight it?

[Stoner710]

Yes, You got understand that governments without the presence of firearms tends to go down authoritarian path. Because what is to stop them from doing what they want without a well armed population. This happens a lot throughout the world. Look at China and Russia and Cuba for example

[OddBeMe]

How is Europe today more authoritarian than the US? Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Because they don't want to understand. They would rather see guns as sentient beings than tools.

[Anonymous]

Because it is the year 2022.

[CloudMassacre]

What would you define tyranny as?

[Stoner710]

Government involvement in every day life. Governments ability to take away your rights to demand yourself against every day life.

[Anonymous]

Guns are for Pigs & Pussies, cops & cowars

[Stoner710]

Ah so if someone breaks into my house and tries to rape my wife if I have a gun to defend myself and her I’m a coward now? So what am I suppose to use a knife or fists? What if the intruder has a illegal gun? Am I suppose to sit there and watch him rape my wife or die myself trying to save my wife from getting raped in which cases she going to get raped anyway and now is a widow? Makes a lot of sense.

Not to mention places like seattle Portland has defunded the cops and made it harder for cops to do there job and the defunded the police so now we don’t have enough officers to protect those cities much less rural countries where the nearest cop in 20 miles away. So basically you’re arguing that I should allow my wife to get raped and not defend her with a gun.

[Opinion Owner]

Woah take it easy. It's just a ryme I made up. I know you have a right to bear arms.

[Opinion Owner]

Getting all worked up for nothin

[Opinion Owner]

Help me finish the ryme?