- 2.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBecause the news is the problem more so than the world. Close your laptop, shut off your TV, put your phone in the junk drawer and go OUT into the world. Report back after two solid days offline. The world isn’t what they’ve told you it is; not even close.
10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yThe news largely reports bad and scary things. There's some good stuff too, just no money to be made reporting it.
10 Reply
+1 yListen, way more messed up stuff happened in ancient times. We are biologically inclined to reproduce. Children are fun and cute. Here's an idea, love your kids and communicate with them then teach them right from wrong and how to be part of the solution.
03 Reply- +1 y
It might be too late for me. Sadly I never found anyone nice and perfect haha, and that loved me back and willing to be a good parent toward my children. But I think some women don't care about that requirement, they just want to reproduce and be a parent at ALL cost, no matter WHO it's with! Wether he's in jail, on drugs, have anger issues. It's people like those I am annoyed by and feel angered by. It reeks of irresponsibility!
- +1 y
Also, babies (and children) being cute SHOULDN'T be a sole reason for having them but I guess that's plenty enough for a lot of women! They can be so shallow!
- +1 y
We're the same age. It isn't too late. The news media is designed fpr psychological assault. It isn't as bad as they would have you believe. Wishing that you find your special someone and that you have a million trillion babies with him! Thanks for the MHO ❤
- 828 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yPeople have children so that I already can continue to exist. For some Spanish people living in the United States without speaking English lots of them have children so that they can get lots of benefits and get a housing and so without working.
02 Reply- +1 y
Oh wow that's not good. How can they not feel guilt when milking the system like that? ! I hope when the child grows up and out of the welfare care, their parents (AND THEM WHEN THEY'RE OLDER!) can contribute some of their wages BACK!
- +1 y
Unfortunately they usually don't. It's actually not uncommon to meet several children and adolescents who don't even speak English
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
19Opinion
- 2.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yDon't open the news and you'll see why they have children. The news is doom and gloom. It only seems bad because they collect all the worst things from millions or billions of people and concentrate it in one place.
If you ignore the news it doesn't seem so bad because the real world is not nearly as bad as the news makes it out to be.10 Reply 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. And how is not having kid solve all the problems? So you think the world will be better if only people who doesn't care breed. And those who do doesn't. Wouldn't it be better the other way around?
00 Reply3.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because we were Intelligently Designed by a Creator God with a decree to spread all over the earth and take dominion. It will always be this way until Jesus the Christ second coming…. This is why‼️
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yWell, what’s wrong with the state of the world? I see no issue worth not having children, not even close. It’s strange to me how we think things are so bad. Politics don’t equate to actual quality of life either. I’m having a damn good life so far.
010 Reply- +1 y
People's morals, bullying, etc.
But yes, people will be selfish. Those who are will usually be able to pass on their genetic line because of that!
Opinion Owner+1 yMorals? Do you know the shit morals people had not long ago? We are fighting over morals that took decades to even be able to consider.
On the point of bullying, I was bullied by my brothers every day. In the moment it hurts but if you get back up ull be all the better. But of course bullying sucks, it’s happening less and less.
Ones who are selfish I believe probably won’t have kids. In my opinion having a kid is the least selfish thing you can do. You essentially put an entirety worth of dedication into a person. Your life is essentially built for the sol purpose of lifting up the next generation. Not your hedonistic desires. Also, most people who have kids on there own terms are married. Married is a vow to be selfless to this person you love. Lastly, if one is selfish they will probably not enjoy living, therefore not having kids. Being selfless is the most gratifying thing you can do.- +1 y
Wow you are very opinionated aren't you.
I don't know why you want to engage in a heated discussion regarding this but okay I'll play.
Bullying takes a toll on your self esteem, often times long-term! If one is bullied, they often feel depressed and suicidal afterwards and wonder what is wrong with them and why they just can't fit in! Your brothers were bad in that they did that to you but I wasn't referring to familial abuse (that can get better as both parties MATURE and move out of the house they were raised, etc.). I was talking about school bullying, bullying online (cyberbullying), and even offline ones (but that is fortunately decreasing due to labor laws, discrimination laws in hiring or on the job, etc.).
Having children SHOULD ideally occur inside a marriage institution, you're right, but you do know there are SO MANY single mothers out there and they (unfortunately) won't be the last from what I can tell. Back when I needed Welfare, I came into that Social Services office to find a bunch of men's pictures POSTED for "all the world to see" what a dead beat and a bum they were for not paying their child support for their children!
Also, did you know about the MGTOW (MEN GO THEIR OWN WAY) movement (a bit similar to Feminist movement), in that they HATE women and blame them almost 100% for how society is and how society is that? They HATE how women can initiate the divorce 70% of the time and they HATE having to give up their house and probably more than half their assets to the woman from a divorce! Tell a MGTOW men to get married and they will LAUGH in your face while walking away!
- +1 y
[cont'd in second reply because of the dumb character limit]
... Also, having kids IS in a way pretty selfish if you think about it. Otherwise, why don't people just ADOPT a child from an orphanage or another unwanted foster child? Why does it always have to be THEIR OWN? What is so special about their genes over other people's genes? People like to say that "oh but it's expensive to do it! Not to mention time-consuming." ... You know what I say to that? EXCUSES, EXCUSES!! - +1 y
ugh.. ! Why does G@G get rid of my exclamation marks / double punctuation sentences =(.
Opinion Owner+1 y1/2
Quite honestly I’m disputing for the opportunity to learn. To see a rebuttal to my undisputed beliefs is beyond valuable to me. I actually think our views aren’t directly opposed. I’m gonna try to reply to all your points here but I may not be able to reply again.
I agree with you on bullying, it should stop and in-place healthy “pushing” between friends. I think there is some value to that “pushing” that occurs while being bullied. I do however think bullying is less these days. Cyber bullying is a whole different thing in my opinion, and may be even more destructive.
Opinion Owner+1 y2/3 actually
I totally agree with you people who are not in proper places in there life should not bring someone into the world. All that burden the child can/will soak up. I’m arguing, getting to a good place and having a child is valuable. My heart goes out to mothers (and the children) who have children in a good place and the father leaves. That’s very hard to control for.
Never heard of MGTOW. While I do not speak for them I suppose I can possibly bring some light to their thoughts. The marriage thing is simple, the system is for mothers and the spouse who makes less. They see that as unfair, because in some ways I suppose it is. However in my opinion it may be a necessary evil. What is more interesting to me is their hate for women, this seems very bad to me. If I had to place myself in their shoes, I think they’re frustrated. They see the feminism movement and see people getting heard. They feel as though they are not heard. Everyone wants to be heard and their problems taken seriously. They also feel like they are being attacked by feminism. I think good examples of this is the concept of toxic masculinity, mansplaining and man spreading. I think these concepts makes what men naturally are going to do and demonizes it with unknown boundaries. Men are masculine, men generally like to explain things they know, and mens legs are naturally longer. The problem is the unknown boundaries, where these concepts actually become problematic. Most men are reasonable with it but feel they are being told it’s bad. Lastly I think the sexes just shit on another because they only see their view. I am not saying thats the only reasons but all that I can see/say
Opinion Owner+1 y3/3
The adoption thing is a good point. My response is having children is an extreme amount of dedication. You want some skin (literally) in the game. I do see how that can seem selfish and it is to an extent. But I don’t think our natural desires are something to fight. We naturally want our genes to pass on, that’s life. I still think it is in the most part selfless.
On a deeper level, I don’t think humans are capable of being selfless in a concrete sense. Your selflessness is always going to fill your own ambition. Even if you sacrifice your life, you still want to be a hero.
Overall the point I’m trying to get across is most everything can be controlled for in modern times. Make your life what you want- +1 y
Okay, well, thanks for seeing things from my perspective. You're different than a lot of people (who just like to argue for the sake or arguing or being right!).
I'm glad that you finally understood things from my point of view. It's annoying when people try to argue, even if it turns out they are in the wrong sometimes. - +1 y
By the way, it wasn't because I was practicing hedonist activities (lol I had to look that up.) that I didn't have children earlier. If it means to have an indulgent or "extravagant" lifestyle, people WITH children can have those too.
In fact, I wanted to make sure I was financially (and relationally as that's just as important) stable before I had them. Hence, maybe that wasn't such a smart idea? I'm 38 now and don't have any children, and my window to have them is closing fast every year (or it may have already shut. I don't know. I have to go to my doctor still). You can make money any time, but you cannot have children at any time. Maybe those people who had children, despite not being financially sound or there, are smart/wise after all!..
The state of the world is better than it's ever been. The news focus only on the negative, it doesn't give you realistic big picture at all.
00 Reply8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because having your own kids that love you and whom you love is a great thing
05 Reply- +1 y
Did it have to come from YOUR gene pool? Just curious.
- +1 y
THEY I meant. If you have more than one.
- +1 y
Thanks, but you're not saying that people with children are BETTER than those without children are you? ? !
It's not like I could have controlled IF and WHEN I was going to meet someone special and procreate with them...
So are you also trying to tell me that most people (women included) that have used birth control in the past, and thus, resulted in them not having any children, should regret it? ? !
Wow damn. 😞
12.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because they are not cowards like you, and want to live their life as is their want.
01 Reply- +1 y
Lol it wasn't called being a coward. Wow is THIS how you like treating people by insulting them? Way mature. Especially at your age lol.
Some people DON'T like the state of the world and how people are (maybe I can include you in that lol). They are just looking out for their children's welfare in that way too. Being protective. So you call people who actively CHOOSING to not have children a coward? Wow, you're a real joy to be around aren't you.
People by nature don't care what's happening in the world as long as they are safe n secure with resources.
01 Reply- +1 y
You mean welfare from tax payers? Hmm...
But yeah, you can make money any time you want but there's a limit to fertility. I get.
+1 yOf course they will. The difference will be on who will keep having children. The good people who want their children to right the ship? Or the bad people who will keep bringing evil to the world?
00 Reply4.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's still statically the safest time to be alive. Stop watching fear porn. They make their money off of gullible people like you.
00 Reply
+1 yIt's human nature to what to reproduce. It's our genetic programming!
08 Reply- +1 y
Are you sure? Why are there some people on earth that DON'T have children or DIDN'T reproduce? ! Are you sure it's not the "Selfish Gene Theory"? I mean I think we are more inclined to you know, do the dirty, and having children was just a byproduct of that Fun Thing lol.
Also, how about the advent of Birth Control. If having children was so popular and dreamy, then why do people even use birth control then? ! Why not ban ALL forms of it?
- +1 y
Evolution is only about surviving to reproduce and continue the species. Man is playing with nature with BC.
- +1 y
Hmm interesting.
Yeah, man created money, society and economy too and try to control so many other things regarding life. I guess creating it (or not creating it) is no exception! - +1 y
Man has ALWAYS attempted to control and manipulate his environment starting with fire and tools.
- +1 y
@Snsl153 Yeah, but during the fertile years of a woman's life (especially starting from puberty, or even before), the hormone signals are rather strong. Also, the ones who do end up trying to control nature, lose out in the next generation or whatnot. Not saying all people care about that stuff but it's just fact. Those people with "Selfish" personalities and reproduce their genes into the future, will "survive". At least half their genes. But then I heard that after a few generations, with all the mixing going on, it gets diluted anyway!
Humans are interesting. - +1 y
Genetically-speaking, mixing genes is GOOD! It means wider population variations and greater possibilry of adaptation to change, which ultimately means survival of the species. Only problem is look who is reproducing; NOT necessarily an ideal example of a human being!
- +1 y
Yeah, unfortunately/fortunately, we don’t get to dictate who does and doesn’t get to have children. That’s never been a thing really, at least not in the U. S.
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yMakes you wonder why they are banning abortion when they can’t even take care of the children that are born
00 ReplyThats a complex qiestion. I say because they are optomists.
00 Reply5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Someone has to bury me.
00 Reply12K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because they believe in a better future.
00 Reply554 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. as long as people fuck
people will have babies03 Reply- +1 y
"as long as people fuck
people will have babies"
I am guessing you've never heard of the pill, the condom, the shot, the cut, the patch, etc. - +1 y
"birth control is not 100%"
True, but, if used correctly (maybe not even correctly), it's still pretty good at preventing. I heard the odds are only 4 to 6 out of 100 women will get pregnant (used correctly). With human error it's like 10 or so out of 100. Even if it's not used at all, a woman only has usually a 30% chance of conceiving per month during her fertile years. So it's like a couple REALLY has to be trying with NOTHING to get pregnant.
I don't know what these people who have failed birth control (the pill), is doing/was, but yes, weight (being overweight) CAN decrease the odds of the drug working, I read.
"birth control is denied to millions of women around the world"
I wonder why? Is it because the partner wants a child but the lady doesn't? ! Hmm...
701 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I don't understand it either
00 Reply- 716 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBehavioral evolution
00 Reply - 675 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBecause they love.
02 Reply- +1 y
Don't you mean lust? You can love someone without it resulting in a child. Of course that's a dream come true for most average people though! A child that their "love" produced! LoL.
- +1 y
No, I mean love.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions