Should the right start harassing the left when they go out to dinner?

[Stoner710]

So the left decided that it’s perfectly acceptable for individuals of the left to go out and protest and kick out member of the right when they go to restaurants and eat. Then you guys decide that this is peaceful protest and harass members of the Republican Party and justices who disagree with them politically. Even kicking out press secretaries who work for the president whom they don’t like. The White House came out and said this is perfectly fine.

if this is the case we need member of the right to protest outside Elena Kagan‘s house and protest and harass her for not over turning obergefell v. hodges.

now if you want to use this stupid idea that there isn’t a constitutional right to eat dinner. You would be right. But there is something called common decency. So either both sides are going to ignore common decency or we’re going to have to agree on basic things like don’t go out and harass politicians that disagree with you while there eating dinner with there families.

[StevieNix]

The left wing terrorists set up a Facebook page so that when anyone on the left spots a supreme Court Justice or any Republican politician at a restaurant, you posted to the Facebook page. In the terrorist mob will meet there to harass and intimidate the person.

So Tucker Carlson told his audience that every conservative in the country should go to that page and start reporting fake restaurants where a Justice is at.

I can't remember the name of the page, but you could Google it. You can overwhelm the terrorists by posting millions of fake sightings.

[Snakeyes7]

Best not to stoop to their level. The last time the right did that, we are still hearing about it.

[Stoner710]

The issue Is if you don’t stoop to there level they destroy you and get away with it and your stuck trying to fight in there world and use a tactic that is peaceful and civil while the other side isn’t peaceful and civil. So you loose unfortunately the tactics of MLK doesn’t work any more in the United States. Malcolm X tactics seem to work.

[Snakeyes7]

I get the whole "tree of liberty requires the blood of tyrants" idea but care needs to be taken before it can be applied. The media has eyes on only one side of the divide.

[Stoner710]

You’re not wrong but I think blame is definitely justified in a certain direction mainly the left. But I’m biased. I’m on the right and good go on for a century on wide lot is wrong and the love to could do the same thing and we never come to a full agreement this year is when we implement our policies o

[CloudMassacre]

I’m fine with both being protested

[jshm2]

More than they already do, you mean.

[Anonymous]

All Trumptards should be harassed

[Agagagagaga]

If only your party cared about people instead of ostracizing them.

[Stoner710]

All Libtards should be harassed I agree

[Opinion Owner]

Seriously? The party of murdering POC and harassing women? Hypocrites

[Stoner710]

Seriously why shouldn’t I go out a harass AOC and protest in front of her house because she wants to murder unborn babies. by the way harassing women. Is Sarah Huckabee sanders not a women? Was she not harassed and throughout of a restraint because she was the press secretary under trump? What is executable for 1 political party to do is expectable for the other party to do. Otherwise we don’t have equal protection under the law.

by the way what is a women can you give me a definition of the word women without using the world in the definition it’s self.

[Opinion Owner]

No one is killing babies but the murderers who kill babies who’s already born.

[Stoner710]

Ok, so how we’re talking a 6 in difference in location now. Ralph Northam in Virginia subjected (it was never actually implemented) that if a baby is born and the mother doesn’t want it then we should make the baby comfortable and let it die on the operating table. Gavin Newson in California has subjected we allow abortion up until the point of birth if a women is scheduled to go In and give birth the next day she still has a right to murder the child. Even if Florida they say you have the right to murder your unborn child at 15 weeks.

Let me guess at 15 weeks it’s a parasite right? Shouldn’t parasites be taken out of all women?
If giving birth is more dangerous then abortion wouldn’t that make the case of sterilizing all baby girls when they are born so they don’t have to go through the pain and deadliness of childbirth?

There was a women Who recently testified in front of Congress saying abortion was the best decision she ever made if that’s the case she probably shouldn’t be making her own decisions because she’s making terrible ones that result in the death of her own baby.

Even biologist agree life begins at conception

[Opinion Owner]

It’s a parasite even before 15 weeks.

And again it isn’t murder. I’m pretty sure if the fetus could be removed to grow outside the woman women would have no problem with that option. The issue is it’s invading the woman’s body, she doesn’t want it in her and she should have that right to have it removed. Sort of like a tumor

[Stoner710]

Well a fetus can’t be removed form the womb and grown outside the womb it’s impossible. There’s be Experiments that have tried this all they call fail.

So all parasites should be removed from the body. If you get a tape worm it has to be removed so all fetuses should be removed from the body regardless of the mother wants a baby or not it’s a parasite and must be removed 100% of the time.

[Opinion Owner]

No if a woman wants to suffer with having a baby she should have that right as well. The issue is when a woman doesn’t want it inside her: the sickness, changing of emotions, pain, and suffering, etc. Women should only experience that if they want to

[Stoner710]

That makes absolutely no sense. Is it a child or is it a sickness women themselves do not get to decide these definitions.

So why don’t we get to the root question
when does life again I believe?

[Opinion Owner]

You don’t make sense because obviously you and the government doesn’t see the fetus as a parasite. That’s why you all want to force women to stay pregnant and ensure she gets pregnant by banning forms of birth control. IM saying it’s a parasite but I’m not the pregnant one so if a woman wants to suffer then that’s her but if she doesn’t, she should have that right to get rid of it

[Stoner710]

My point about birth control is it’s not protected by the constitution so the issue if left up the the states not the federal government this was what Clarance Thomas argued in his confirmation of Roe v. Wade non of the other justice wanted to go there so Griswold v. Connecticut isn’t likely to get over turned all I’m saying is the constitution says nothing about birth control therefore the federal government doesn’t get to have a say weather or not Connecticut can or cannot Ban birth control. Again we have seem to have forgotten the 10th amendment exists but that basically says that any issue that is not protected in the constitution the states get to decide. That’s how our constitution works. I’m not for the banning of birth control but I’m not for the federal government to dictate to the states whether or not birth control should be legal in Texas and illegal in Connecticut. Remember the federal government was designed to basically be worthless compared to the states.

Now there only 1 country in the world that forces it’s women to get pregnant which no one will point out not even members of the republicans party because there scared to piss off china if you don’t want forced pregnancy stop supporting China women are raped and forced to give birth. All we are saying ion the pro life side is be responsible if you can’t afford a kids don’t have sex with your boyfriend or even husband until you can support the child. Since Griswold v. Connecticut isn’t going to be over turned use birth control if you want to be sexual active.

To be clear I am not in favor of banning birth control. My main thing is the federal government doesn’t have a right to say anything about a state banning it and another state keeping birth control legal. Our system was built so the federal government doesn’t have much rights. They didn’t even have the right to collect income tax only sales under the constitution they literally had to amend the constitution for them to collect income tax