Tim Pool exposes the Jan 6th committee below, thoughts?

[Juxtapose]

Below is a short clip for those of you who lack the will and patience to sit through a 10 minute video.

https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx6ZA4Vtvc0PI88_KghZmIpdcWz-Bvp3T8

[goaded]

Tim Pool worked out where the money is years ago. It's in having the thinnest veneer of "leftism" and being willing to publically lie, and support the right.

Bannon got given a subpoena. He did not comply. He was taken to court and found guilty. (In front of a Trump appointed judge, by the way.) The same would happen to you or anyone else in that situation.

What's Bannon's objection to telling the truth under oath? That's all he's being asked to do, and he's still entitled to take the fifth.

[Juxtapose]

That hearing is not authorized by the Constitution and has no power to issue subpoenas.

[Juxtapose]

There is no cross-examination or real bipartisanship. And what you say about Tim speaks volumes in my opinion.

I still like you and all but I think you are very wrong about Tim.

[goaded]

The judge disagrees with you, and I guess he knows more about the law than you do.

You understand that the purpose of a congressional investigation is to get to the truth, not to score political points? This is not Benghazi, where they worked out there was no wrong-doing early on and proceeded to hold multiple more "inquiries" (McCarthy even admitted they were intended to hurt Clinton's polling numbers).

Why did Trump wait until sufficient government forces were in place to repel the attack before calling it off?

Why didn't Trump call in the National Guard?

Why did Trump call for his supporters to come to DC on the 6th?

What was Trump's supposed belief that the election was stolen based on?

[Chazmatazz269]

I wonder if you feel the same about the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade. Do those judges also know more than the rest of us? Or is a judge’s knowledgeability and, i suspect from context, integrity dependent on whether or not YOU agree with their decision?

[goaded]

@Chazmatazz269 In the case of today's SCOTUS, of course they know more about the law than any of us. It's more about what they said in their confirmation hearings and how historically low the number of votes they achieved for confirmation were.

The 7 justices that decided Roe in 1973 were mostly nominated by Republican presidents and, iirc, had a total of 36 votes against their confirmations. Today's six justices had over 200 votes against their confirmations, all but one of them (the only one that was willing to preserve Roe) had more than 40 votes against their confirmation. Every one of them said under oath that they would respect precedent. None of them, unsurprisingly, mentioned "until we've got the votes". Trump boasted that he was nominating anti-Roe justices.

As to this particular judge and his integrity, yes, like all the Trump nominated judges that threw out his election lawsuits, deciding in a way that their mentor wouldn't like does show integrity. If the judge had been nominated by Obama or Clinton, you'd probably be saying it was a partisan decision.

[Chazmatazz269]

That’s a lot of words to justify your hypocrisy. Just admit that you only respect a judge’s knowledgeability when you agree with them. If you can’t avoid being a hypocrite, at least own it. Ell oh ell!

[goaded]

@Chazmatazz269 So if the judge had been nominated by a Democratic president you wouldn't be claiming that it was a partisan decision?

[Chazmatazz269]

I don’t recall claiming anything about a partisan decision in the first place. You might be mistaking me for someone else.

[Juxtapose]

The judge is clearly compromised.

[goaded]

Ell oh ell!

[Chazmatazz269]

What he said. ^^^

[goaded]

@Chazmatazz269 That’s not a lot of words to justify your hypocrisy. Just admit that you only respect a judge’s knowledgeability when you agree with them. If you can’t avoid being a hypocrite, at least own it.

[Agagagagaga]

@Juxtapose Dude you’re arguing with a German Leftist. His people, hell, his goddamn family were probably right there goose stepping along with all the other Nazi shits. He’d cheer for anything if he thought his political opposition—even though he lives in another goddamn country!—could get removed or silenced. He’s literally the second biggest piece of shit on this website, after the Swede who loves to tell America all about itself. Coming to this website has given me a whole new appreciation for just how much I hate Europeans. They are smug and condescending and think their shit smells like roses and perfume. You know how I communicate with them? I tell them to choke on their own shit and die. 👍 Fuck them.

[goaded]

@Agagagagaga Very impressive. Totally wrong, of course.

[Chazmatazz269]

Ell oh ell! Why are you copy pasting my reply?

[goaded]

@Chazmatazz269 Because you were accusing me of only respecting the judge for handling an open and shut case the way I would like (which is reasonably and in accordance with the law) while you two are saying the only reason he didn't throw out the case for no reason must be because he is "compromised".

Bannon broke the law.

[Chazmatazz269]

I said no such thing. If you’re talking about my “what he said^^^” reply, i was talking about YOU. Because what he said is hilarious AND YOU stole my “ell oh ell!”.
ELL OH ELL!!!
You should really be ashamed of how often you jump to ignorant conclusions.

[goaded]

@Chazmatazz269 That's nothing like assuming I only respect judges that rule the way I want them to, I suppose? I admit, I wasn't sure and I wrongly assumed you were agreeing with @Juxtapose, I apologise.

There's a world of difference between someone who behaves with integrity and someone who misleads congress to get into a position of massive power. (I'd say "lied to", but they're lawyers who know exactly how much they can legally get away with.)

[Chazmatazz269]

There you go again. I didn’t assume anything. I asked a question. If you like to read non-fiction, i recommend “Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error” by Kathryn Schultz. It’ll change your life. I promise. You can thank me later. Ell oh ell!

[goaded]

Thanks for MHO.

[goaded]

And, by the way, why did Trump wait until sufficient government forces were in place to repel the attack before calling it off?

Why didn't Trump call in the National Guard?

Why did Trump call for his supporters to come to DC on the 6th?

What was Trump's supposed belief that the election was stolen based on?

[anylolone]

Hilarious!
They wrongly quoted him.

[Juxtapose]

Holy fucking shit someone who actually watched a video!

It is pretty damning isn't it?

[anylolone]

Yes, I watched milk toast beanie bitch about literal congress misusing his quote, besides a whole list of people.
It's comedy gold!

[StevieNix]

You would have to be a complete idiot that thinks that Jan 6th this was real, but there are many idiots out there.

As for convicting Steve Bannon of doing the very same that Obama's Eric Holder did, but doing nothing back then; speaks volumes. It was OK for a dem to do this, but not Steve.

If there is a red wave this fall, there will be a new Jan 6th hearing, and this time Nancy Pelosi and many others will be asked questions under threat of pergy.

[StevieNix]

Thanks for the MHO.

[RolandCuthbert]

I don't have the will or patience to sit through a 10 minute video for a poster who can't think for himself and/or lacks enough command of the English language to express his own views.

But I did find this Josh Hawley video hilarious. Running for his life after riling up the insurrectionists.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/b-jL1ztTY-s

[Juxtapose]

Keep up your useless ad hominem attacks 😂

[RolandCuthbert]

I think you should consult with youtube before responding to me.

[Agagagagaga]

Why @RolandCuthbert Do you work for YouTube? What makes you so goddamn special?

Oh that’s right. NOTHING.

[RolandCuthbert]

@Agagagagaga I am going to do myself a favor. I am going to ignore every single post you send me.

I am not going to block you.

I am just going to ignore you.

:D

[Agagagagaga]

You can’t ignore me. If you could you wouldn’t respond.

But I’ll be sure to continue exposing what a vile retard you are to everyone. 👍 Peace homie.

[Juxtapose]

@Agagagagaga thank you!

[RolandCuthbert]

You should have used this "Thank you" youtube video. It says exactly what you are unable to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVltjpE0h9g

[Juxtapose]

Whatever you say nutjob.

[Avicenna]

It's no surprise- these are the same crooks who brought us the Russia Hoax and many others.

[888theGreat]

They didn't fight the charge because he didn't show up, but they are appealing verdict and a judge will probably overturn conviction because he will testify now and what can they do to him now? He will say what he wants (the truth) .

He was only convicted , because he only worked for Trump the 1st year and not the last three years. Narrvaro was with Trump all 4 years , so he won't be convicted when his trial comes up.

[goaded]

Have you ever had a speeding ticket go away because you stopped speeding?

[888theGreat]

@goaded He knew nothing about the Jan 6th. He didn't plan Jan 6th. He was not in Capital Jan 6th , so why should he go to jail for not knowing about Jan 6th?

[goaded]

He's not going to jail for "not knowing about Jan 6th", he's going to jail for refusing to turn up and tell the truth under oath. If the truth is that he knew nothing about it, then he could say that. It would have been cheaper, quicker, and easier. So why didn't he?

[Sabretooth]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TyL9RL92vU why do you guys keep doing this to to yourselves? do you guys just enjoy being utterly hamulated?

[Plinko]

Like I need Tim Pool to tell me what a political show trial looks like.

[JDavid25]

We already knew they are on some B. S with the January 6th thing..

[msc545]

Why should I care about the opinion of some guy named Tim Poole?

[Juxtapose]

He was used as evidence falsely lol.

[msc545]

what?

[Juxtapose]

Check out the clip if you wanna know, 2nd link.

[Juxtapose]

Less than 50 seconds.

[msc545]

TL:DR Just explain it.

[Juxtapose]

lol no. I didn't go through the trouble making that clip just for people to ask me to explain what he said.

[msc545]

10 minutes of my lie is 9 minutes and
30 seconds too much. I don't care what some nobody on youtube thinks, sorry.

[Juxtapose]

Jesus fucking Christ dude I already told you that I made a clip specifically for people like you that is less than 50 seconds.

It's the second link as I said before.

[Juxtapose]

If you can't spare less than a minute then I don't know what to say.

[spartan55]

Dude, people don't want to watch videos for this shit.

[Juxtapose]

@spartan55 then gtfo

[Juxtapose]

@spartan55 you only represent your own lack of patience not anybody else's lol.

[spartan55]

@Juxtapose
Whatever you say bud.

[Sabretooth]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/2TyL9RL92vU

[OddBeMe]

Wow…they’re annoying af. Is this where you right wingers get you news?

Bannon’s contempt of congress is pretty well proven by him ignoring his summons. If we want our congress to have teeth and govern, Bannon’s toast.

[Juxtapose]

You didn't look at the clip, did you?

[OddBeMe]

I tried…but theyre annoying!

[Juxtapose]

How is a YouTuber explaining how the government misquoted them annoying? It's literally in the second clip and it's less than 50 seconds long.

[OddBeMe]

Wow, misquoted them? Thats crazy. Wait, Bannon is still guilty of ignoring a summons…so whats the point?

[Juxtapose]

First of all what they did to Tim is literally slander and illegal.

The subpoenas are from a committee that keep claiming they are not a trial. There is no cross-examination or bipartisanship of a court involved.

Steve was exercising executive privilege (that does not disappear when you are out of office otherwise George W Bush would have been convicted by now) and did not have to testify before this farce of a committee (his lawyers explicitly told him not to). He was also negotiating terms much like other people who have been subpoenaed by this committee are doing, a lot of them want the testimony to be televised as a condition for their testimony.

Police literally let people into the capitol building so I don't even know why this is being discussed in the first place by Congress besides Machiavellian political reasons.

[OddBeMe]

But still…Did Bannon ignore a congressional subpoena or not?

[Juxtapose]

He rightfully followed his legal counsel and refused to show up for that farce. It's not a trial and it should not be treated as such.

[Juxtapose]

Also like I said, he has executive privilege.

[OddBeMe]

As idiotic as executive priv…from what I read its not a pass to get out of summons, or passed to non-presidents. But since its stupid invention after other GOP scandals in 1974, thats gray area.

[Juxtapose]

Well his own lawyers told him he didn't have to show up according to current law so I can't blame him for listening to his legal counsel 🤷‍♂️

[OddBeMe]

Thats been a long time rule: your lawyers dont face consequences for your actions. Even if their advice is wrong.

[Juxtapose]

Well dude I can tell you if I was in his position I would do the same thing. If I know I have executive privilege I'm going to use it.

[OddBeMe]

Again, from what i read its iffy. But regardless, why do you auto beleive shit from annoying youtubers?

[Juxtapose]

So what, you're going to read newspapers or watch news channels that lie to you all day? CNN and Fox News are two sides of the same coin.

I would rather look at independent journalists any day. Tim Pool and Jimmy Dore are both great and on a higher caliber there is Glenn Greenwald.

[Juxtapose]

Executive privilege is absolutely a thing though so you can't even save a lied about it.

[Juxtapose]

*say they lied about it

[OddBeMe]

As i said, exec priv is iffy in actual court. Especially to WH admin. And he didn't show up to a congressional summons. So…warrant. Court is where this will all settle.

And I ask again, your youtube buddies just auto call this a witch hunt or whatever, when again we dont know. So why do you automatically beleive them?

[Juxtapose]

The easiest way I can explain this to you is that my perception is different from yours so I see this event as something very different from what you see.

The independent journalists are the ones talking sense and have proven themselves to me. Someone like Jimmy Dore or Glenn Greenwald is worthy.

Tim Pool is to the right of me but tends to be right in my opinion (see what I did there?)

[Guy13]

It’s too bad.

[Juxtapose]

The best thing we can do is expose these liars as the frauds they are!