Will this shut conservatives up?

[blissinanarchy1]

Keep up your narrative that racism against whites is tolerated, you victims.

As a liberal, I frequently see assumptions that minorities “do no wrong, aren’t held accountable, white people have no special protections like they do.” When I see white people violate black people, and they get charged, and hit with the hate crime enhancement, they say “They’d never do that to a minority.” Well, they do. You just choose not to see if, because of your confirmation bias, and it doesn’t go along with your narrative. And here it is, reported on news that apparently “Is left wing extremist completely biased.”

[maltipoo143]

I'm actually somewhat conservative, but I imagine you are talking about the nutjob reactionaries that sit on the far-right end of the political spectrum. I imagine this will actually add fuel to the fire since this shows that non-white individuals commit hate crimes. Personally, this doesn't really faze me at all considering I've seen plenty of it.

[Supermomof3]

We had 2 officers shot and killed by a non-white group of guys! It wasn’t even reported until the next day. However let it be the other way around and it will be breaking news! I’m just so fed up with the uptick in making everything about race and police.. it’s causing more dangers now more than ever. Police Departments are losing officers in crime ridden cities because they aren’t allowed to do their jobs. I wouldn’t put my life on the line for their pay grade!

[maltipoo143]

@Supermomof3 Yes agreed. It's unfortunate that the MSM chooses which stories to put out to the public based on what race the perpetrators are as well as what race the victims are. My parents are both in law enforcement and they say that their academies are losing students because of the backlash that cops receive for one person's mistake. And like you mentioned, law enforcement is so highly regulated now that they have to be careful not to make a wrong move.

[Supermomof3]

It’s just so sad :(

[Supermomof3]

In my opinion this poster needs serious help! Isn’t he white?

[maltipoo143]

@Supermomof3 Lol he sure looks like it

[blissinanarchy1]

@Supermomof3 I need serious help? You literally followed me to watch my posts. You’re part of trump’s cult

[Supermomof3]

I followed you before I knew you needed mental help! Thanks for reminding me

[blissinanarchy1]

@Supermomof3 I need mental help. Lmao sure, you’re a Trump cultist under his delusion, in denial of reality.

[Supermomof3]

Why do you let 1 man control your mind? I’m not even mentioning him!

[Anonymous]

No of course not.

1. CNN is not trustworthy

2. One incident of something right happens does make up for all the wrongs. Or perhaps we can ecpect leftists to now admit the excistens of anti white racism and abyone who says hou can't be racist against white people are so wrong if they claim to pretend to want equality and they say they would lose trust in someone conservative for being wrong for the sake of the equality they claimed to want they would need to ensure an equal amount of loss of trust in the leftists who dared to denie the existence of anti white racism

[blissinanarchy1]

There’s a difference between systematic racism and personal prejudice. Anyone can be personally prejudiced. Only white people can commit systematic racism.

[Opinion Owner]

Racism is racism. And perhaps even one racist comment against white people is enough to prove it and shut up leftists? Or perhaps CNN on a rare occation like you mentioned in OP is just a broken clock is right twice a day scenario

[blissinanarchy1]

Personal prejudice is racism. Yes. There’s a difference between systematic racism and personal prejudice. If I call you a honkey, a cracker, etc, yes, it’s racist, just like it’d be for saying the n word. Only white people in our country hold the majority and enjoy the social advantages of being white.

[Opinion Owner]

And remember how important equality between black and white people is, if one can be systematically racist against, the other can too. Unless you think the equality BLM supporters wish for is unimportant

[Opinion Owner]

Gotcham so if a white person were to say something to another white person they have the power to make that systematical racism against white people

[blissinanarchy1]

What you just said made no sense. If equality is important then one can be if another can be? The situation is in today’s society there isn’t equality. Only white people can be systematically racist, that’s why BLM and other groups exist. Personal prejudice will never stop, but systematic racism is something that can be eliminated.

[Opinion Owner]

What I say does not make sense? What I'm saying, is black people wants to be equal? Fine with me. For the sake of equality, either both can be systematic racist against or neither.

If white people are the only people that can be systematic racist, ok, then white on white racism can be systematic racist since the racist is white.

[Opinion Owner]

To answer your original question again, no it will not shut up conservatives. CNN is not trust worthy, and just because they get something right for once does not mean its not a brocken clock is right twice a day scenario.

[blissinanarchy1]

To have that equality, you need to create it not just claim you have the ability

[Opinion Owner]

And they have created it. You yourself linked a proof of how equal whites and minorities are in the OP, I assum you want us to belive that pic, yes? Just because they claim to be oppressed does not mean they actually are oppressed.

[blissinanarchy1]

That’s personal prejudice not systematic racism

[Opinion Owner]

Theybwere arrested for racism, just like white people have been, sounds quite equal to me. Could be equal enough to consider their racism systematic even. And how do you prove if a white person is systematic racist or prejudice racist? Those three black women could be systematic. And if you are denying black people the possibility to nåbe systematic racist, perhaps that would be a bit racist? Even systematic racist against black people if tone could dig up multiple white people trying to denie black people the ability to be systematic racist?

[blissinanarchy1]

Systematic racism is policies and practice put in place in coordination by the majority to suppress a minorities rights. You’re talking out of your ass

[Opinion Owner]

So the practice put in place by white people that only white people can be racist could be an act of systematic racism since its put in place by white people to suppress minorities ability to be systematic racist.

[Opinion Owner]

Ment the practice but in place by white people that only white people can be systematic racist could be an act of systematic racism.

[Opinion Owner]

Glad you found my answer helpful

[NamerOfStars]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/443/193

Does this shut YOU up? Open discrimination against white people (and men, for that matter) is not only tolerated, it's *accepted*; the Supreme Court said as much. How many of THEM have been arrested?

But sure, continue your narrative that three people being arrested in connection with a single case somehow completely undermines decades of social and legal precedent. Do you want equality, or don't you?

[Supermomof3]

No because I don’t trust a thing CNN says! They’ve been caught in way to many lies!

[jshm2]

You're an idiot then, and need to learn to read as well.

The headline clearly says "allegedly" meaning nothing is yet proven.

Hence you've sold your ass for nothing, and publicly outed yourself as a two faced bigot trying to be something they are not.

[blissinanarchy1]

Whether it says allegedly or not, it was reported. Allegedly is used in most scenarios. Even when a white mass shooter is arrested the word allegedly is typically used, that comes down to the reporter, not even the channel. And you just threw the word bigot around incorrectly lmao.

[HighValue]

Finding one rare case (that is still protecting a woman, not a White man by the way) does not equalize the hundreds of cases where it is the opposite. False equivalency.

[normalice]

If facts and counterexamples to far right narratives could convince conservatives not to be conservative, there wouldn't be any conservatives. They're not doing what they do in pursuit of truth but rather to evade truth.

[NewsReader]

One incident is nowhere near enough to balance the bias.

[Googlemyahoo]

Three women beat up an elderly lady & you go full virtue signalling. How would the media have responded were it three whites beating up an old black lady? Yea nice try kid.

[NYCQuestions1976]

One story or example (if accurate) doesn't alter, negate, or counter the reality of other stories or examples.

[Celtrabbit]

You think one right stuff will make people forget about the 9999 wrong?

[findacure4wokeness]

@Celtrabbit they must have sent that one story out to repair there reputation for being tremendously biased.

[blissinanarchy1]

@findacure4wokeness Conservatives call anything biased, if it isn’t biased in their favor.

[findacure4wokeness]

If I was a woke piece of shit I would try and muddy the waters with a story like this but As Celtrabbit said 1 right doesn't make up for 9999 wrongs.

[blissinanarchy1]

@findacure4wokeness Trump muddies the waters 24/7, I guess he’s the definition of woke, huh?

[Juxtapose]

One instance of justice does not erase thousands of instances of injustice.

[grega239]

So she was arrested for assault not the insult.

Isn't that how law is supposed to work?

[Anonymous]

Then you are suggesting the law and media are unbiased in this respect?

[Anonymous]

It’s quite rare that they do.

[OddBeMe]

Oh. No, nothing will.