Why won’t Democrats condemn pedophilia and child sexual groomers?

[Anonymous]

Sorry, I meant “minor attracted persons.”

[JamesDiaz11]

Probably because they see it as inconsistent with their ideology. While it's not yet time to bring them fully into the LGBTQ+ fold, they know that it's coming. If they're "sex positive," believe children have the mental capacity to make up their own minds (especially when it comes to being transexual/ homosexual), and that people's sexuality is not only natural, valid, but should not be constrained it's only natural that adults be allowed to have sex with children, and vice versa.

If the Left is not stopped, not only with transgender surgery/ treatment (hormones) be offered to children under ten years old, they may begin offering surgeries/ birth control that will facilitate children having sex with adults. This sounds absolutely grotesque, but does anybody think that this, right here right now, is as far as the Left wants to go? That no further sexual deviancy would be added to "acceptable," that individuals assigned "child" would be off limits?

In my lifetime alone, this nation has gone from only offering civil unions to homosexuals in a handful of states, to explicit homosexual sex being taught/ promoted to kids in school, by shemales... We have a shemale running the department of health and human services, and open perverts in other high- offices. Gay marriage wasn't the end goal, it just gave them license to push us far further.

[RolandCuthbert]

Haha!!!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-strategist-anton-lazzaro-arrested-for-underage-sex-trafficking

Anton Lazzaro, a young Republican strategist and former congressional campaign manager in Minnesota, was arrested on underage sex trafficking charges Thursday morning, according to federal law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

They do just see how much they shit on Matt Gaetz and Jayson Boebert

[Anonymous]

Are you retarded?

[OlderAndWiser]

The far left liberal manifesto says that you should be able to do whatever you want without suffering any consequences. . . unless you are a Republican.

[sawno]

Don't get to stuck up in your own bubble, I know the right wing talking points mention this kind of stuff decently often but they are still referring to a fringe of the fringe. Most democratic voters would condemn it and aren't radical LGBT activists.

[Soteris]

Because its very unpopular to accuse the Church of crimes and the Republicans tend to protect the guilty anyways.

[joeldalton]

Did you see that there is a group called “Gays against Groomers”? They are against people in the alphabet bunch grooming and fucking children. They’ve been unpersoned by social media and electronic payment apps.

[Avicenna]

That’s a very good question. I guess they’re now a protected Democrat class.

[jshm2]

Because it's not nice to hate on all republicans and conservatives.

[Philyouup]

fuck off. really you sound like a trumper. dems do, you just blinded by MAGA propaganda so again, fuck off trumper

[exitseven]

They need every vote they can get.

[KrakenAttackin]

Because these are core democratic voters.

[AngryCarl]

Why are you gay?

[MrTaboo]

Because evil can't denounce evil

[Anonymous]

Why would they attack thier base?

[Esperdragon]

This is a huge overgeneralization.