What's your opinion of Dr. Oz torturing dogs while practicing at Columbia University?

[llorando]

https://people.com/politics/fact-check-dr-oz-role-columbia-university-dog-experiments/

[Anonymous]

“BREAKING: Dr. Oz is a puppy killer.” 😂 🤦‍♂️

Liberals really have no shame, do they?

I especially enjoyed this line from the article:

“But is there evidence to support claims that Oz was, as the Jezebel article states, involved in research that "inflicted significant suffering" on animals used in experiments?”

I’m gonna go ahead and say “no” Alex, because otherwise it wouldn’t have been phrased as a question. 🤦‍♂️ 😆

Reported by Jezebel 🤣 Are you fucking kidding me? It’s one of the most biased “publications” out there. 😂

[NewsReader]

Biased and not credible.

[Slingblade1126]

Animals are evil! I had a friend that was repeatedly raped by a horse when he was a ranch hand. Every time he would bend over the horse would mount him! He told me on one day he was raped 15 TIMES! I can't believe he worked there for 15yrs. Funny thing is, he was hired to feed the cattle.

[OlderAndWiser]

A story like this is published about 30 days before an election and we are supposed to automatically believe it? Because the MSM never gets anything wrong?

[Avicenna]

Sounds like the typical Democratic Party hoax that comes up during campaign season.

[llorando]

Sounds like it, but it's not. Veterinarian Catherine Dell'Orto pretty much confirmed it, even stated she was horrified by what she saw.

[Avicenna]

Yeah, well, after reading the article I remain skeptical. The reports didn’t name him, and she’s no doubt a rabid leftist.

[Agagagagaga]

She is. I checked out her Twitter page.

I also found this: billypenn.com/.../

Incredibly this lady ran to PETA after Columbia University and the USDA didn’t respond in a manner she felt was appropriate. She even goes on to say that Dr Oz wasn’t directly responsible and didn’t personally euthanize any dogs. She just doesn’t think he was punished enough.

So now they are talking about it nearly 20 years later when he’s running for political office.

But it’s definitely not political. Nope. No sir. 🙄

[NewsReader]

As of now, there is no evidence of this. Plus, if Jezebel is the original publisher / source of this then it's most likely false and a political hack. Jezebel is not a credible source.

[OldSchool_Metalhead]

I always stay skeptical with news stuff. But if it's true, damn bro that's messed up.

[TroyDT2]

Sounds like an unsubstantiated hit piece. How surprising just a few weeks before an election.

[SmokinAces2000]

I really don’t care about animals so even if this is true which it doesn’t sound like it is I don’t care

[blondfrog]

Yeah if that headline is not click bait and exaggerating then that's messed up.

[Anonymous]

Almost as bad as the way he tortures his viewing audience. 🤣

[ColdExtraction]

I don't like it, but I'm willing to tolerate it, if it helps humans ( not for cosmetic)