Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?

Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Updates
+1 y
Overall, being obese is associated with about 20% more greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) than being a normal weight. obese person eats maybe at least 4 times what a person at a healthy weight eats which means higher carbon emissions to both produce, transport and cook the food, then there's the extra weight and space they take up in aircraft, buses, trains, ferries. Even their own cars use more gas and need maintenance more often.
Updates
+1 y
Obesity is immoral.
Updates
+1 y
Think about it. If you are eating 2-10 times the amount of food you should then you are 2-10times more damaging to the environment than someone who doesn't
Lizzo. Should she be cancelled due to her massive carbon footprint?
Post Opinion