Terms of Service on Trump's Social Truth Web Site?

[loveslongnails]

Thoughts about this for hypocrisy, folks?

Under ""Prohibited Activities" in the Terms of Service:

"The user agrees not to... disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, IN OUR OPINION, us and/or the Site"

You can say what you want to, so long as you agree with ME!! So much for a "social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation".

Updates

+1 y

@BeMuse (since the twit blocked me lol) I don't give a shit about Twitter, OR Trump's media. You can't seem to grasp the point that Trump created the same exact atmosphere he railed against and cried "foul, this is unfair and a violation of free speech". LOL That's the point of my post, dude. SO MUCH for free speech under Trump's rules too! Try and get the point.

[BeMuse]

First you complain, if you don't like the rules of Twitter go make your own social media platform. So Trump did, and now you've also lost Twitter to Elon and now you're complaining about social media terms of service. Why don't you go make your own social media platform? Trump did...

[BeMuse]

[Guardian45]

I'm sorry to say this, but I don't give a rat's ass about Dump's Truth platform. The less people use it, the faster it dies a timely death!

[Guardian45]

Thank you for MHG!

[loveslongnails]

You're welcome!

[purplepoppy]

In other words, you can't tell the truth.

[loveslongnails]

You certainly can't post anything that Trump doesn't agree with, whether it's true or not.

[gorydetails]

Meanwhile, Biden traded an arms dealer who sold weapons to terrorists for a woman basketball player. But I can see why these terms of service are so outrageous.

[loveslongnails]

Not sure why you felt the need to mention the first part, as it has nothing to do with my question. As an aside, I hope they get the soldiers back. Sure, it would have been better if we had one of their basketball players, and a few draft picks to trade. LOL

[gorydetails]

It's important because a good chunk of this country is so concerned with "Orange Man Bad" that they are ignoring actual corruption happening in front of their face.

[loveslongnails]

Corruption is everywhere in government. It was there long before Trump and will be there after he's gone. This is nothing new. He just did a worse job of concealing it because as a narcissist, he figured he can do anything. Cheney did the best job ever!

[gorydetails]

That doesn't address my point.

[loveslongnails]

Sure it does. People are numb to it unless it falls on their face. Who are you expecting to police the corruption when the foxes rule the henhouse?

[gorydetails]

I'm expecting people like you stop worrying about the terms of service on a dumb social media platform.

[loveslongnails]

Worry? LOL That's not why I posted it. I don't give two shits about that moron or his platform. I was just copying a guy's tweet and laughing at the irony of it. You have to admit, it's fucking ironic and funny!

[gorydetails]

It's neither.

[loveslongnails]

Not to you perhaps, but it sure is ironic to me, and funny "pathetic", not funny "ha ha".

[gorydetails]

No, to me the pathetic part is you thinking it was interesting enough to post

[loveslongnails]

You're entitled to your opinion, yet, you chose to comment on my pathetic post. It's been civil to this point, let's leave it at that.

[Anonymous]

His platform his rules. Obviously leftists who loves that argument is going to use it to defend Truth social here. For the sake of equality.

[loveslongnails]

Hmmm... and aren't YOU totally missing the point! When Trump was banned from Twitter, he railed against it for everything from censoring free speech to a violation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to a Democratic and Communist influenced plot. Not ONCE did he say "Ok, their platform, their rules", because he argued it was an interactive computer service and fell under the auspices of the above-mentioned act.

Well duh, Donald, so does YOUR platform, so be consistent. Why and how are you ANY different from Twitter if you throw people off your platform for disparaging you, or your comments? It's the EXACT same thing Twitter did. Their platform, their rules. So, you're no better than all the shit you spewed at them, and that's the ironic thing about your "truth" platform.

[loveslongnails]

And further, Twitter took that action because they judged what Trump was saying to be unproven bullshit and, essentially, creating havoc, and they made a tough choice. It was not simply that management disagreed with or disapproved of Trump's "opinion", rather, it went far beyond that.

[Opinion Owner]

Leftists tends to say "their platform their rules" when people complain about lack of free speech, so I thought they should applie his platform his rules to Trump's platform too. I never said anything about what Trump or Twitter said or did when Trump got kicked off Twitter.

[loveslongnails]

" Leftists tends to say "their platform their rules" when people complain about lack of free speech" Huh? That sounds both speculative and anecdotal at best, since everyone who's ever created a social platform has had "their own rules". Right-wingers and moderates do the same.

And soooo? What's your point?

[Opinion Owner]

Thst they should use those arguments to defend Truth social.

[loveslongnails]

There's NOTHING to defend about Trump's platform. It's simply a means for him to propagate the bullshit he believes. Fine, have at it. No one with any intelligence listens to him.

[BarryLiverstone]

It’s logical