
Is it any wonder why Trump calls it the "Fake Media.'
Is it any wonder why Trump calls it the "Fake Media.'
You can't reason with the worthless piece of shit left. They only see and hear what they want to see and hear, never the truth.
Such good lemmings.
They are like npc's, no matter what you say to them, they keep spouting the same stupid bullshit over and over. It's like trying to reason with a parrot.
You got that right.
It's like the entrance to Hogwarts. It's only there if you believe it's there. 🤣
Very well said. No one will top this, so the MHO is yours.
The best reply of 2022.
Thank you.
Don't thank me, because I'm going to steal your brilliant line, and use it as my own. lol
👍🙂
Opinion
11Opinion
It doesn't look like he's saying they should. It looks like he's saying that such a fraud effectively DOES terminate the rules, and that the founders wouldn't condone it.
In fact, what he's not stating is that the founders would have literally gone to war over it.
Excellent.
@holdem4884 look in the mirror, ditz.
Or work on your reading comprehension skills.
That’s not what he’s saying at all.
Your TDS is showing. U hate him so much, I bet if he said that gravity existed you’d find some way to twist that into a racist tyrannical bid for power.
Stfu, you ignorant parasite.
@holdem4884
Sorry, but no trolls allowed.
I said this from the start. IT is like when the fake news said that Trump told people to inject bleach. It never happened but if you repeat something enough times you will get some people to think it must be true. This is especially true for older people who lived in a time when the news media had integrity. Sadly those days are long past.
Excellent point about the bleach. No one could produce a video with him saying that.
Bleach video, around 40 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zicGxU5MfwE Dont believe everything you read online guys :)
@exitseven ,
'
If he "believes" Trump mentioned bleach, so it must be real.
Remember when they kept calling Ivermectin, "horse wormer?"Now they found out they were so wrong to not use it. So now they just forget they said it.
It was once again the leftists attempting to distract the public from the Twitter files which proved that:
1) The FBI and Biden administration colluded with social media companies to suppress news that would be harmful to Biden's election chances
2) Fauci's daughter worked for Twitter during the pandemic, which contradicts testimony made under oath.
Yeah, it must be a distraction, and it worked.
I never heard about this Fauci/daughter thing... I'll have to Google up something on it.
Oh and the lawyer just let go from twitter was altering/suppressing the file drops Elon was doing.
Those scum bags. I hope the good guys win for a change.
@holdem4884
Sorry, but no trolls allowed.
@goaded Oh, ok, so we can go back to my original reply.
1) The FBI and Biden administration colluded with social media companies to suppress news that would be harmful to Biden's election chances
2) Fauci's daughter worked for Twitter during the pandemic, which contradicts testimony made under oath.
@goaded
Joel, I've told this idiot many times to stop posting on my threads. I come from a proud family of Americans. We love our country. If this mental-case German feels the need to spend every waking minute bashing America, I support his right to do it. But it won't be happening on my posts.
You would think he would respect my wishes, but he doesn't. He's a sociopath that can't be helped.
And this is coming from a German-American.
he didn't.
"liberal" minds interpret differently. They are reading into what was said. anything he says is ludicrous, it's baked in the back rooms of the media outlets and whipped up to the front pages. You won't find a story on CNN about the DNC collusion with twitter. if you were to do a poll... democrats would support that collusion. anything to win is their motto... because it's about global climate change in their view.
Depends on how you interpret the meaning of the the word “allows” in that sentence. Does he mean gives permission for the termination or does he mean the failure to prevent from happening? The fact that he’s alluding to being declared the winner or holding a new election suggests the former but it’s possible he meant the latter, as his word choices are not always coherent. It’s easy to see why the statement was problematic.
It's pretty basic, so I don't see any interpretation needed.
The word has more than one meaning so yes, interpretation is absolutely necessary. You’re also ignoring the fact that holding a new election or declaring a new winner would require terminating the constitution. It does give a string hint to his meaning and many conservatives have also interpreted it that way. It isn’t just the left.
How do you intemperate Rorschach test graphic.
I intemperate it as Trump trying to fight his way into the Capitol building on Jan 6th.
Words are not an abstract blob of ink. They have actual meaning, which can sometimes be different based on the context of the overall statement. I know you understand this concept. If you’re only interested in obfuscating here, then that’s fine. Just say so but playing dumb is not a good look.
The update is for you.
Reply or don't reply, but no more bullshit.
You’re obviously just trolling at this point but I’ll indulge you one last time. No he didn’t speak the exact phrase “ terminate the constitution “ but that was the message conveyed in his comments. I realize you’re advancing a narrative and you won’t deviate from the message because of that but know that few people are buying what you’re selling. Speaking of bullshit, I’m going to leave you to it.
Was it really that hard to answer this simple question? What's wrong with you?
I never asked for interpretations. I asked someone to show me where he said what everybody's accusing him of saying.
Roxxy99 did at least admit he never said it and while admitting it, admits ANYONE that said he did, is blowing smoke up your ass!
@Wally
Yeah, it's not rocket science, and because of that fact, it just means that people are straight up lying about this.
We all know Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from Alaska. We all know Russia colluded with Trump campaign officials to influence the 2016 election. We also know Russia sabotaged its own pipeline. Wait... none of these are true. They are just what major media claimed or implied.
Are drunk?
Sorry about that. I thought you were defending those lies.
The reason Trump didn't do interviews with his enemies, is because he knew they would twist it and lie about the entire thing.
Just look at my post;
I posted exactly what Trump said word for word. And then I challenged people to show me where Trump said what the media is saying he said.
They are all lying.
You can see land owned by Russia from land owned by Alaska. That's true. You can't see mainland Russia from mainland Alaska, but you can see land that is owned by Russia standing on land owned by Alaska. That's true. Russia didn't collude directly with Trump, but they did contact the Trump campaign and there was possibly an unacknowledged agreement. There's nothing concrete because Putin did not sanction it, but said if some did it he was a Russian patriot. I didn't hear much about Russia's pipeline, we don't use them for oil, so it's not important to our trade agreements or international policies.
@Twalli the main foreign collusion during the 2016 campaign was with Ukraine and the UK fabricating evidence and influencing the Russiagate narrative. This is well established and completely exposed now, but will never be the focus of media narrative.
Stopping the nordstream pipeline has been a longstanding objective of US policy in order to make Europe reliant on the US as opposed to Russia. This is why the US sabotaged it. This is also well established with abundant evidence and also ignored.
No, I can't find the exact term "terminate the constitution". @goaded you asked a question about if someone could come up with another interpretation for what Donald said. Maybe you could help me and the asker find the exact place in his post were Donald used the term "terminate the constitution" in the screenshot the asker kindly provided?
Thank you for that.
There was nothing wrong with what Trump said, so that's why the left wing news has to spin it into their own bullshit interpretations.
He's NOT saying that! That's just want the loony lefties THINK it says because THAT'S what fits their narrative! That's just the way retarded people twist the words of others.
Trump says: She's a very pretty girl!
Lefties hear: I want to rape the hell out of her and shove my dick down her throat!! And her little dog, too!!
He said there was a "massive fraud". And he said that a massive fraud "allows for the termination of [...] even those found in the constitution".
What's the confusion here?
"termination of all rules, regulations, and articles even those found in the Constitution". Termination (a form of terminate) the Constitution.
Now show me the part where he advocated for this. If I say there is a big fire in California, would you interpret that to mean that I love fires or I might even have started this one myself?
He said the "fraud" allows for it. If there is a massive fraud that people can actually prove, which they can't, then we must examine how elections work. The fact is, on average, fraud amounts to 7 votes, any election within 1k votes is almost always recounted, and you can as for one if the difference is as much as 3k. If the difference is 7 votes then there'd be no question of a recount. The fact is, your individual vote doesn't matter. You can't swing an election by yourself. You'd need thousands of people voting who hadn't previously to swing a vote.
He wants to get rid of fraud, so he was making a point.
It's like if I said if we're going to allow illegal immigration, why do we have an immigration department?
So then the left wing would twist that all around and say that I said we need to get rid of the department of immigration.
That's why people need to stick with what's been said and not what they think has been said.
You asked for the words "terminate the Constitution". He used termination which is a form of terminate in the same thought process as the Constitution. Now he said articles which as anyone who has actually read the Constitution knows, he wants to keep amendments. Yet, also people who have read the Constitution know that there's nothing in the articles related to voter fraud. In fact, there isn't in any part of the Constitution.
It doesn't
Correct. The left-wing media just added in that part, and hoped you wouldn't notice.
Line 4-6 i believe
And what did he exactly say?
So you can't find the part about Trump saying he wants to terminate the Constitution?
Right, he never said it.
@loveslongnails
Go away, Jerk.
Most Helpful Opinions