I'm looking for intelligent, thoughtful and logical reasons. If you don't have any of those, please just move on. If you're rude or suffer from Trump derrangement syndrome, you'll be shown to the door.
Is it because Trump is trying to do away with the second amendment and get rid of guns?
Is Trump trying to get rid of the first amendment so we don't have that stupid free speech?
I can't think of any logical reason why he would want to terminate the constitution.
Why would Trump want to terminate the Constitution?
He doesn't want to terminate the Constitution. As President of the United States of America it is his duty to execute the Office of President of the United States and to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. When he was presented with information of election fraud, he made an emergency declaration for the District of Columbia on January 11, 2021 which set in motion steps to maintain continuity of government under FEMA powers. FEMA powers allow for the suspension of the normal rules during war and major crisis including those found in the Constitution. He would be derelict in his duty if he didn't take action when he was in office after being informed of the election fraud that occurred in the 2020 election. Thus he was required to take action... FEMA powers are very wide sweeping, and scary but in conjunction with PEADs (Presidential Emergency Action Documents) a plan can be set in motion to protect the country from our enemies.
The military has been monitoring elections since 2016 due to foreign election interference. On September 12, 2018 Trump in acted Executive Order 13848 to deal with it. Biden extended a continuation of Executive Order 13848 on September 7, 2022 because we are in an active state of emergency.
Come January 6, 2023 the Supreme Court goes into conference over Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al. When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Congress had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office. There is a very real possibility that Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, 296 House Representatives, 98 Senators which accounts for the entire elected Democrat party will be ordered removed from office by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Orders would be handed down to the U. S. Marshals and Secret Service.
After this civil case that removed them from office, a criminal case under military justice would need to be carried out due to the nature of the attack and occupation of a territory on the United States of America. Thus normal rules would not apply even those found in the Constitution. The participants in the conspiracy would be subject to the Law of War...
He doesn't and he did not say that. If you read what he posted it is clear that he meant that the alleged fraud in 2020 allows for all sorts of lawlessness, including the setting aside of the Constitution.
That said, in truth the political establishment has already abrogated much of the Constitution. Simple example: federal laws that ban things that are clearly intrastate commerce, like growing and selling marijuana within a state's own borders. Nowhere in the Constitution is Congress granted authority over this, and the tortured reasoning behind "allowing" it pretty much gives Congress endless authority to regulate anything for which any component ever crossed a state border. The point of the interstate commerce clause was to stop states from setting tariffs against each other, not to allow Congress to say, "The bag for the fertilizer you used was made in another state, so we can regulate everything that the bag or fertilizer ever touched.
Trust me, I've spent two days defending the fact that Trump never said he wants to terminate the Constitution. So now I switched gears, and I'm asking why he would want that. Crickets.
Here’s the weirdest part to me. Lefties are all outraged at a lie based on what he said. But EVEN if you accept their misinterpretation.. we have this…
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
The current corrupt state has become destructive to the pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
You never disappointed me in the least. Do you seriously think for a minute that when I asked for intelligent replies, that I thought I would get them? lol
I'd ask you what a "bait" question is, but I'm sure you wouldn't have a clue. I don't know why the staff elevated this bait question to the top of the heap, but they just did.
I really was hoping for intelligent answers that made sense, and not some knee-jerk replies.
Read what he said, he doesn't want to terminate the constitution he simply acknowledged the reality that rigged election DO terminate the Constitution.
@springvalley If you want to imagine Trump was saying the exact opposite of what he said go ahead its not like its the only thing you choose to beleive in contradiction with reality.
@SpringValley I've already given such an answer. It goes without saying that when the rules of cease to be enforceable particularly in areas that control everything, it effectively terminates all laws, regulations and the Constitution.
Which is exactly why law enforcement and making enforceable transparent laws and elections is soo important.
There's some stuff in there that was applicable when it was first drafted, but is irralevant by today's standards. And there's some other stuff in there that's not so good.
He doesn't, I'm convinced he's been dead since the January fiasco. They'll use his deep fake ghost to try and scrap the constitution and disarm the public before going full surveillance police state would be my guess.
He didn't say it, but the libs are saying he said it. I posted his Truth Social post, but everyone just wanted to come up with their own version of what he said.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions