Is Twitter blowing the lid?

[Bratsondanielle]

Twitter is releasing the censored information on the very real laptop but now they released the footage from Jan 6 where trump says to not be violent (after they broke the window and threw Pelosi's papers on the floor and other horrible stuff)

This has been removed (censored) so Trump wouldn't look like a good guy

Is this why "the white house is keeping an eye on Twitter " (Karim Jean Pierre)

It's so cool

It's great

Finally truth comes out

We need Trump more than ever

I'm a lib - we need censorship

[FunkyMonkee]

I didn't need to see video, I saw him say that on the day!! I also saw video of the REAL Trump supporters standing peacefully behind the police barricades and telling the police they support them, too and that they were doing a great job!!
I also saw the video that day where the "riot" started and quite few of the REAL Trump supporters pointed out, vocally, that those were actually antifa assholes DRESSED LIKE Trump supporters!! WHY would Trump supporters show up with mountain climbing gear?
A few days later, I not only saw the video of the security people swinging the gates open and INVITING the crowds to come rushing in but, also of Buffalo Boy supporting a blm rally the previous June!!

[Chazmatazz269]

You can’t reason someone out of a position they were never reasoned into in the first place. The left hasn’t believed in facts for at least one full generation.
Look how the media won’t touch covid now that compelling scientific research challenges their rhetoric. The same will hold true for anything coming out of Musk’s twitter. They’ll ignore everything they can and deny what they can’t ignore.
Why should they do anything different? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!

[DevikaButts95]

Yea I think it was known he eventually said that.
He still incited the riots on that day in the first place, changing his tune doesn't mean much.

[Bratsondanielle]

Yes when he said "I know some of you will walk to the Capitol and peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" he clearly started the "insurrection"

[DevikaButts95]

He said other stuff more aggressive.
Not to mention, even a peaceful insurrection is still an insurrection. His word especially was incredibly dangerous as it is extra powerful with a large backing. Like his word should be under tougher scrutiny than your average citizen.
And then let's not forget that him telling his followers to do that lead to a bunch of massive and legal consequences for THEM. His incitement, even if peaceful, led to lots of regular citizens facing actual jail time because what they did was very illegal. Even if he committed no crimes, (debatable at best), morally that's pretty shit, they're gunna have to serve all those punishments, not him because of course why would they think they'd face any consequences when the president told them to do? He used them as pawns for his bidding. Spooky stuff, it's really hard to side with it no matter what side you take politically.

[SpringValley]

What is it like to be a brainless lemming? "He said other stuff more aggressive."
Really? Like what? Why did you forget to mention the "stuff?" lol

[DevikaButts95]

@SpringValley
Couldn't really be bothered to look up something that happened practically 2 years ago to give exact factual info because it happened 2 years ago and it's pretty locked in that what he did was bad no matter how you shake it, so I was just going of recollection. I assume that's why you only focused on the first statement and didn't bother tackling anything else I said, which already speaks volumes on the whole stance point.
As for the stuff:
"... And we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. And we’re going to have to fight much harder. …

“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them, because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong."

"When you catch somebody in a fraud, you are allowed to go by very different rules."

"We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore."
(That's the worst one in my opinion)

"And after this, we’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. … We are going to the Capitol, and we are going to try and give — the Democrats are hopeless, they are never voting for anything, not even one vote, but we are going to try — give our Republicans, the weak ones, because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re try — going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."

I mean it's pretty bad stuff, especially given his weight as president where such language can be way more, I guess volatile is the word I'm looking for. I don't know why you thought no one would be able to bring ammunition for that kind of claim though?

[Wallythewalrus]

I think you need to look up the definition of "insurrection". Has the looney left gone so radical that they honestly believe any type of protest against them is an insurrection? Is this what the media has brainwashed you to believe?

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
"an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"
Yep it was an insurrection, that's one of those things that's just a fact by what the word means.
Calling me the left isn't adding anything to your guys arguments either.

[SpringValley]

@Wallythewalrus

If any of this was remotely true, Trump would be in prison.

[Wallythewalrus]

"A VIOLENT uprising against an authority or government". To say an insurrection can be peaceful is just plain wrong, by definition! And don't play this game of, "oh, don't you dare call me a leftist", that doesn't work with me.

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
Nope my definition was lifted straight out of meriam webster, not to mention you get the point by "peaceful insurrection." One of the bad parts is that it was an uprising against the government to claim power for himself.

[DevikaButts95]

@SpringValley
I believe the worst he ever could have faced was just impeachment for that due to him being president, but I might be a little off on that. He is still facing lawsuits for the insurrection.

He definitely should be in jail though, his followers sure are getting punishments for listening to him, thats pretty fucked.

[SpringValley]

1. There was no insurrection on that day.
2. Trump did not order the fake insurrection that day.
3. The people who entered the Capitol on that day, were paid to do so.
4. Why can't the FBI figure out who Ray Epps is?
5. Many insurrections happened in the summer of 2020, and the left is silent about them.

[Bratsondanielle]

Can you tell us why the communist media like cnn are still claiming that a cop was beat to death when it's been proven wrong so many different ways? The peaceful protest of Jan 6 was a day on the beach 🏖 compared to the average blm riot (you know the terrorist organization blm I assume)

[DevikaButts95]

@SpringValley
1. By definition, it's considered an Insurrection. This is a fact, there's no arguing it even if you don't like it, this point is automatically conceded.
2. Trump himself has stated conceded he informed his followers to march to the capitol, so similarly this point is conceded.
3. I'm not sure what you mean. Do you think they were paid actors or did Trump pay them? The former is already conceded by Trump and the latter I did not hear about but that's at least better... still sucks they're facing pretty bad legal consequences.
4. I don't know what this is about at all, but it sounds like some sort of whackadoo conspiracy stuff based on the first three points. I don't know anything about whatever you're talking about to argue any position, and it doesn't seem worth it to me to discuss.
5. This is completely irrelevant and I do not care. You gotta stop assuming I'm the left. January 6th is an insurrection.

[DevikaButts95]

@Bratsondanielle
It's news media. They're all like that.
BLM doesn't really tie in here at all, but yea again given what this... "protest" was for, the manipulation of the President's followers by the President, and how this protested occurred in a place where it's basically illegal I would say it's particularly worse than a violenter riot. Not that it matters which of them is worse, what stands to reason is the January 6th attack is incredibly bad, it doesn't matter at all if you can point to worse.

[Wallythewalrus]

The U. S has it's own penal code for an insurrection and what happened on Jan. 6 didn't meet it. How do I know? Because the FBI said so. They call it what it was. A riot. This is how you are constantly manipulated by the media. They, along with the looney left call it a "resurrection" but anyone with any legal authority or relevance, doesn't.

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
The FBI classified it as domestic terrorism actually.
Like I said, the insurrection point is conceded, it meets the definition. Not to mention I don't really see what you gain from arguing semantics at this point, like do you think it being called a riot somehow reduces the severity of it? Lmao.

[Wallythewalrus]

You can feed others your bullshit but not me. The FBI did not consider it domestic terrorism or an insurrection. So, obviously it didn't meet the legal definition.

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
I mean: thehill.com/.../
It's not hard to look up at all, not sure what the point of that really is.
Again kinda falls back to the point anyways of what do you hope to accomplish? It doesn't reduce the severity of it at all.

[Wallythewalrus]

And you keep saying it was conceded. By who?

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
Facts.
Like I don't care much to argue points that are already proven a certain way, that's why we're still talking about whether it's an insurrection or not when it is. It's a pointless argument in every regard, just some desperate grab at an attempt to not be wrong.

[Wallythewalrus]

Fact: Not one person has been charged with insurrection.
Fact: The FBI concluded it wasn't an insurrection.
You can say it was an insurrection, because that's what the Democrats and media want you to believe but the people that actually do the investigating and charging said it wasn't. What you think really doesn't matter.

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
Multiple are facing jail time for the January 6th attack, lots of which have already been sentenced.
I already linked you the article of FBI claiming it to be domestic terrorism.
It matches the definition of insurrection according to Meriam-Webster.
Again, this point is conceded. What you think doesn't really matter, get over it.

[Wallythewalrus]

Lol!! You need to get over a dictionary definition of "insurrection"! Again, there is actually a U. S definition. Which is, a planned, organized, forceful and violent attempted take over of a governing or authoritative body. Whether local, state or federal. I've seen the charges and convictions. Protesting without a permit, trespassing, criminal damage, assault of Capitol police... they all deserve what they get and need to be punished! However, NOT ONE PERSON has been charged with insurrection. Domestic terrorism isn't "insurrection". You keep saying, "it's been conceded" but you never told me by who? Was it the FBI? The DOJ? AG Garland hasn't called it an "insurrection". Why? Because it WASN'T! CNN and BSNBC have absolutely no legal standing! You need to realize that. I just got done arguing with another member, that said Trump was convicted of tax fraud. Which he wasn't! But because CNN apparently told him he was, he couldn't accept reality. The amount of mis (dis) information that comes from those that supposedly fight to stop it is disgusting!

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
Yea so again, the semantics of it being an insurrection really matters very little. At this point it seems to be a desperate grab to be right about anything. FBI have declared it domestic terrorism, and it matches the definition of what an insurrection is to the letter, so it's absolutely fair to refer to it as an insurrection. Dunno what to tell you, but it is that way. You cannot argue it, get over it.

[Wallythewalrus]

"The semantics of it being an insurrection really matters very little"? Well, actually it does. Lmao! It's a $500 fine vs 10 years-to possibly life in prison! You are fucking clueless! Again, "domestic terrorism" IS NOT INSURRECTION! You need to learn the difference. You still haven't told me who "conceded" that Jan. 6 was an insurrection and you keep saying it "matches the definition of what an insurrection is to the letter". Can you tell why no one has been charged with it? If it meets YOUR and CNN'S OR MAYBE BSNBCS'S definition of it, why aren't people being charged with it?

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
The semantics matter very little in a talk of how bad the event is and whether Trump is at fault yea.
Again, matches the definition of insurrection according to Merriam-Webster. Doesn't need to match the U. S.'s definition to be considered an insurrection, to which the FBI doesn't actually have a definition that I could find of what an "insurrection" is... but I did find them referring to the Jan 6 attack as an insurrection which makes your whole point of it not being an insurrection by U. S. definition hilariously incorrect.
www.fbi.gov/.../oversight-of-the-federal-bureau-of-investigation-the-january-6-insurrection-domestic-terrorism-and-other-threats
It's conceded by facts, you're arguing something you cannot ever possibly be right about or have a point about. I did already say this, your reading comprehension lacks.

[Wallythewalrus]

Give me the name of ONE person that's been charged with insurrection. Also, like I said, a dictionary definition doesn't hold up in court! Lol I wish it would but judges have actually laughed me out of court. I really don't care what Wrey said! He never charged anyone with it! And to say it doesn't need to match the U. S definition of insurrection shows you might be partially retarded! It's not an FBI "definition", it's the pesty thing called the constitution definition! Jesus H. Christ!

[Wallythewalrus]

I actually stand corrected. Wrey can't charge "insurrection". Only the DOJ/AG can. Which they haven't.

[DevikaButts95]

@Wallythewalrus
From what I found, Trump might still face criminal charges for it. Doesn't matter, matches the dictionary definition anyhoo, AND the U. S. definition of Insurrection, which is here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
Like sorry I know you're hellbent on "someone needs to be charged with it" but no, it's referred to as an insurrection regardless of the fact that no one has yet to be charged with it. It's an insurrection, fact, matching all definitions of it.

[SpringValley]

Elon doesn't even want Trump to run again. Elon is just tired of all the corruption in the country. Yes, the lid is being blown.

[exitseven]

Even if there is irrefutable evidence that Joe Biden is the Big Guy and the FBI collided with Twitter to spike the story which interfered with the election it will not make ant difference. The story is being buried by the media already and the DOJ will continue to sweep it all under the rug. I am not expecting any perp walks any time soon

[joeldalton]

It’s crystal clear the last election was fraudulent.

[Bratsondanielle]

Exactly

[Sixgunsound]

Twitter was what finally convinced you? The postal worker whistle blower didn't do it, the expose of dominion voting machines didn't do it, the number of ballots exceeding the number of voters didn't do it for you, the blatantly obvious censorship and memory holing that was known at the time didn't do it for you, the threats of government violence for questioning their official narrative didn't do it for you, turning DC into an armed camp the very next morning didn't do it for you, etc etc etc🤣

[joeldalton]

@Sixgunsound lol, no. But this is the icing on the cake. The leftists can’t spin this one.

[Sixgunsound]

They will try. They dont have much between them and peasants with pitchforks at this point. The Romanoffs didn't like how that turned out.

[Sasahara]

We can hope. Picked option C: Finally truth comes out!

[Sasahara]

Picked C, the way I wrote it turned it into a smiley

[Bratsondanielle]

❤️❤️

[KrakenAttackin]

It's amazing how everyone said conservatives were just paranoid conspiracy freaks, when it turns out the truth is MUCH worse than anyone suspected.

[spartan55]

Did it have any video of him saying the Constitution should be dissolved? 😂

[SpringValley]

It's up to you to provide that.

[spartan55]

Lol..., what a fantastic defense... 😂 😂

[Surely]

One can only hope! But with the Democrats still pretty much in control. They will write the laws so that they will still pretty much come out on top!

[Guanfei]

Honestly, everyone knew twitter was massively for the democrat, and that they were censoring a lot to fit their views.

This is just everything everyone knew made official.

[Anonymous]

Nice that they finally admit it, not like we didn't already know.

[AngryCarl]

So your source is now fake posts on Twitter? Outstanding!