
I had previously asked if you people thought he was killed by the FBI so I thought I would bring more direct attention to strong evidence that he was killed by the FBI.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
I had previously asked if you people thought he was killed by the FBI so I thought I would bring more direct attention to strong evidence that he was killed by the FBI.
Yes, COINTELPRO existed, and for some radical groups it was absolutely justified. That said, it was subject to J. Edgar Hoover's paranoia and machinations, and it could go off the rails, like here.
That said, the most definitive work about the MLK assassination was Gerald Posner's "Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr." And yes, James Earl Ray WAS the assassin, and his attempts to toy with the grieving King family all the way from prison, and for his jollies give them false hopes of the involvement of others like the fictional "Raoul", were truly disgusting.
https://www.amazon.com/Killing-Dream-Gerald-Posner-audiobook/dp/B00EKPWGY4/ref=sr_1_1?crid=23OHYQHDC4CXP&keywords=Killing+the+Dream%3A+James+Earl+Ray+and+the+Assassination+of+Martin+Luther+King%2C+Jr.&qid=1674100108&sprefix=killing+the+dream+james+earl+ray+and+the+assassination+of+martin+luther+king%2C+jr.%2Caps%2C119&sr=8-1
Considering how pathetic the grammar is in that letter, I'm thinking it's safe to assune it isn't from the FBI lmao That's from someone living in our own time who had too much time on his hands, and thought it'd be a good use of his time to write that letter 😂
I checked, and it 100% is not. Even more evidence that this was written recently and not during King's day is the lack of use of the serial comma. It is extremely common to not use the serial comma these days because a bunch of morons want to buck the established grammar rules out of spite. Or perhaps just because they wsnt to be "quirky."
I always believed the FBI was involved.
American institutions especially back in that era classified all people who lead civil rights movements as a terrorist including a man like Rev Martin Luther King Jr. who preached love and peace.
I have never read that before. It's crazy. The absolute lack of professionalism and the audacity of the writer!
Opinion
11Opinion
I'm very curious to read the minutes from the Elite meeting that made the call to turn MLK into an American hero overnight.
Like what happened? Did they think his memory after his passing could be useful as controlled opposition or what?
How did a guy go from Enemy of the State to textbook American Hero upholding the tradition of liberal democracy practically overnight?
I think it’s deplorable if this is factual and I am angered by this letter. MLK was a stand up guy and class act. I also noticed it stated “your time is coming to an end” or something to that effect which certainly could point to conspiracy.
What do you do when most people are just 'meh' about the absolute corruption of our satanic government?
That is something I am grappling with myself. The conclusion I have drawn is that realistically, I cannot do anything by myself. If I acted as a lone agent and succeeded wildly then I would be assassinated or blackmailed.
The public needs to unite to help shield us against blackmail and assassination but they don't care enough so we are doomed.
I mean we literally just found out the CIA at a minimum allowed a sitting president to be murdered and no one seemingly cares.
@曹鹏joe
I didn’t hear about that regarding the CIA. Would you mind pasting a link.
I’m not a big conspiracy theorist. In fact I don’t believe in any with the exception of both the JFK and RFK assassinations. I always believed the CIA was involved in certainly the former and very likely the later.
Allen Dulles was fired by JFK after the botched Bay of Pigs and I always thought he or the agency were somehow involved.
@joedalton
Much appreciated. Will read now.
@joedalton
Interesting read. I seriously don’t think Oswald even did the assassination or if he had a roll in it he didn’t do it alone.
I could literally write a book on why I don’t think he was involved but I’ll try to give you the short version here.
The whole problem is Jack Ruby killing Oswald. Ruby was the Chicago mobs guy in Dallas. Ruby stated he killed Oswald to prevent Jackie and the kids from having to come back to Dallas for a trial. My dying ass! Am I to believe a career criminal chose out of the goodness of his heart to shoot a man on live TV out of altruism? Those guys are self serving to the max. There is absolutely no way he was not acting on orders.
I think the CIA and mafia worked together on that assassination. It has already long since been disclosed the CIA and mafia were working together to attempt to assassinate Castro. That info was made public around 2007. The mafia helped JFK get elected through voter fraud. That is also established fact. JFK then appoints Bobby to attorney general who then goes on a tear prosecuting the mob.
I believe the CIA did the majority of the work and the mob helped cover it up after the fact. I believe Oswald was a CIA operative and was the fall guy.
It has been long established CIA doctrine to use local criminals for assassinations in other countries for plausible deniability.
Not to mention Oswald passed a test for no gun powder residue on his face.
Dulles was pissed about being fired (who ironically was on the Warren commission) the CIA was pissed Kennedy pulled air support from the bay of pigs invasion, the mob was pissed for being persecuted by Bobby and lastly J Edgar Hoover hated the Kennedy’s and certainly helped cover up multiple facts. That was reveled by the 90’s.
The last thing is the magic bullet theory. I’ve fired guns many times in and out of the military. I’ve yet to see a bullet do any such thing. I’ve seen plenty of ricochets.
Lastly there was the fatal head shot. Kennedy’s head is thrown back and to the left when that shot hits. He was looking down and holding his neck with both hands when that head shot occurred. The kinetic motion of the bullet from the rear would not result in his head being flung back and to the left if he was hit from behind. The fact his head was tilted at a downward angle and was thrown back and to the left indicates he was very likely hit from the front.
Lastly you can watch the film of if that head shot. Advance it frame by frame and you will see that wound in his head begins to open from the front back. It even blew part of his skull on the trunk of the limo. It is possible that does not indicate a shot from the front but that possibility is extremely thin.
No way Oswald did it alone if at all.
Holy schit! I’ve never seen this before! Where did you find this?
Wow that looks like it's written by an imbecile having a petty grudge. Always knew federal agencies were shit but didn't know such unprofessionalism existed in them.
People underestimate the power of voice and speech in people at this point, there’s nothing that can be done, but it make sure that the truth is out.
Absolutely obscene and unprofessional. At the end of the day, organizations are still ran by humans, and humans are capable of having animosity and bias.
This is just worthless hate mail.
It was Hoover and his minions. That’s been thoroughly reviewed and on display by the FBI. Like the CIA in Guatemala and Chile. We did bad shit in the 50s and 60s…
Again, no evidence they killed him.
Of course. I’m always suspicious. But what differentiates skeptics from Q Anon a-holes is evidence supporting your hypothesis.
To be super down to earth…the 60s were a lot like now. Very hyped with fluxing economy and angry populace. Shit tends to happen. Especially to people on the national stage.
Where do you think you got that letter from? US archives. You’re kinda barking up a well barked tree.
You’d be better off reading about the trillions we give to corporations for stunts like the Iraq War, whilst covering up the Saudi connection to 9/11. That’s shit the govt hasn’t come clean about.
I don't feel like digging through a scientific article over something we're going to disagree about anyway. I'll just post you the CDC and what they say.
www.cdc.gov/.../safety-of-vaccines.html
Because…and hear me out…science perpetuates literally by proving the majority wrong. If a scientist can prove the vaccines don’t work or are hugely dangerous…they’ll write up, and get peer reviewed. Other scientists will test it for accuracy. And if it was accurate, that OG scientist would become a legend like Johan Salk. Which is their wet dream.
There’s simply no demand for keeping legitimate scientific data from being published by scientists. A pharm company or oil magnate may try to kill it or pay off the scientist but the evidence would still be there for another to pick up.
You really don’t seem to get this. And it’s troubling, because neither does the US public.
Pretty disgusting if true
J. Edgar Hoover was a deviant who should have been removed from the Directorship decades before he died.
Proof it is legitimate?
Hmm. How do you know it was from the FBI?
You can also add your opinion below!