Does the new standards of society strip people of their individuality?

[the_bruh]

I mean, if i was a woman i would've fought for less work and more pay. Not for "equal rights". Like, men are not the evil of society. Especially not working men. So my question is, whom does this new standards help? If more people decide to work, i can see that the government can get more tax. So we helping the government? With both parents working, i don't think is helping children either. It almost felt like every girl lost their uniqueness after this, they all act and talk the same, literally.

[Chazmatazz269]

Salesmanship…
When you’re trying to buy a major investment, the salesperson always pitches the benefits hard. They rarely, if ever, mention the detractors unless questioned. Then their job is to downplay those. Social issues are the same in every way. It was NEVER a secret that men sacrificed much more than women to provide a “free” society in which women could make ridiculous demands without consequence. Too few people asked and few people listened to the answer. Too many who heard the answer dismissed it among the blind cries of “misogyny”. There’s no question as to why more women are choosing traditional roles again.
The problem now is men who are butt hurt about never having the same freedom of choice. They’re giving up, with good reason. Why should i kill myself for a society that entirely takes me for granted? “Equality” was NEVER about equality. Nobody demanded that women pay the same dues men pay, and nobody offered men the same options women always had. There’s another word for that power dynamic, oppression. But nobody wants to have that discussion because it’s so diametrically opposed to the narrative we’ve been sold for so long.

[the_bruh]

You're absolutely right. Where i live, they're just catching on the trend. It feels hopeless, looking at how everyone's throwing out "misogyny" everytime a question is asked. Only if they could see.

[Chazmatazz269]

They CAN see. They choose to not. Like i said, there are no secrets in this game.

[the_bruh]

Yea, i believe that women are emotional thinkers, when someone said women are not getting equal pay or something they just imagined the woman suffering and now all they can see is the woman suffering. Nothing more than that. Only if they brought some logic to it, they can see the whole picture. Or they need someone new to guide them.

[RolandCuthbert]

Dude, I think if you stated this simply as a family should be able to get by with just the man being the sole provider for the family, I think you will find an awful lot of women agreeing with that dynamic.

[the_bruh]

Not exactly, i want both the parents to be home spending time with the family. I want everyone to be rich that they can do whatever they wanna do, go on vacations, travel. it's never about who provides, it's all about having enough money in the family at least to take a week off every month.

[RolandCuthbert]

Who says that men wouldn't be able to spend time with the family. The fact is in order for most families to survive in the West, both parents must work and work more than 40 hours per week.

That leaves no one home.

[the_bruh]

Cool. Sounds like you've got a great idea about how you like your life the be as. But i don't want to work my ass off for a company all my life so the owners could have a great life and me paying for a house where I'm not at 40 hours of the week.

[Spiritofn]

Obviously in United States how many sports do you see on tv that are team orientated vs individually orientated.

How many artists do you see famous vs singers and musicians...

Fame is chosen by society nott individual... & If your a lucky few, you still probably didn't find your true idol anyway..

[Anonymous]

The government doesn't get more tax. What happens is that people get less wages to the point where ultra wealthy control government because they pay the majority of taxes

[the_bruh]

The wealthy people are the people who pay the least amount of taxes compared to their revenue. Unlike normal people they don't actually have an income tax. They found many loopholes in law to pay the least amount as taxes.

[Opinion Owner]

In the US the pay most of it simply because with the middle class having shrunk so much and wages so low they've basically have the majority of the money coming in but that's just income the majority of their money isn't even income.

[the_bruh]

In the US everyone except the ultra wealthy pay taxes. Attorneys, doctors, self employed jobs. They earn a lot and like 20 percent of it goes to tax.

[Opinion Owner]

They still pay taxes but are so wealthy it's nothing too them

[LiamJHayden]

Modern society is fueled by those who see people as members of groups, and who chastise those who stray from the groupthink, so in that regard, "Yes."

[exitseven]

they are trying but there will only be one Exitseven.

the one and only.

[CuriousMufuxka]

Actually yes. Grouping up to make change that really isn't and only making waves does waste time of individual imagination and creativity.

[OddBeMe]

If you fight for less work and more money will just attract more conflict. Dumbass.

[the_bruh]

Imagine a woman working night shifts, i mean if i was the one hiring, I'd pay her extra because of the risks involved for her to be there. But since it's equal pay. I'd bother not to. If i fight for less working hours and more pay, they'd at least be ready for less working hours and same pay. So who the dumbass now? Lol

[OddBeMe]

Why? It’s dangerous for either women or men. Rapists don’t target overnight workers. They target clubs.

Robbers target overnight workers. And they don’t discriminate.

[the_bruh]

Then we should be fighting for free gun training and a gun for all women. That would be fun too. We'll just call it natural selection for the one's who get accidentally killed, but hey, the population would be under control.

[OddBeMe]

Trained police have a 30% hit rate during gunfights.

How much training would require for teachers, overnight workers and anyone else you want to arm?

[the_bruh]

Not much really, just teach them to take the safety off and pull the trigger. Robbers and rapists do have to get close right. It'd be exactly like women driving, everyone would be scared to death around them. That's the whole point right. And just hope she never has to use it.

[OddBeMe]

Bruh….30% hit rate. You know how many bystanders will be killed? That’s assuming you train them as well as we train cops.

[the_bruh]

That's what I said, population control. They give birth, it'd be right if they take a few out. I don't think God would be mad. Lol. Just kidding.

[OddBeMe]

I know. I’ve often thought of population control. Like abolishing seatbelt laws.

[the_bruh]

Lol. That'd be a good way too.

[NostalgiaSenpi]

They should fight for equal fights.